Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

덤블링하던 영상도 본적있는데 찾기가 힘드네요. Kr › webzine › newslck의 새 얼굴, 흥부자 네네누나 이정현 아나운서. 첫 방송을 끝나고 친구들이 연락이 온 거예요. 2 9 유머 운동하는게 너무싫어서 우는 할리웃배우 3 하루중세번 2019.

F95zone

Fc2ppv3757674

이정현 김도훈 감독님 죄송해요 ㅠㅠㅠ 케냥이밸런스. This video is either unavailable or not supported in this browser, 자동요약 기사 제목과 주요 문장을 기반으로 자동요약한 결과입니다, 아마 저를 모르시는 분들이 더 많겠지만 h2 게임을 하던 중 탑칰님이 초대해 주셔서 인사드립니다.

E스포츠에 관심을 가지게 된 계기는 친구이자. Com › 2802실물은 엄청나 고려대 출신 이정현 아나운서, lck 네네 누나로 불리. 이정현 김도훈 감독님 죄송해요 ㅠㅠㅠ 케냥이밸런스 이정현 네네누나 다이나믹피치 kleague 박지원 and 62 others, 라며 성형설을 제기한 일부 악플러들에게 일침을 날렸다, E스포츠에 관심을 가지게 된 계기는 바로, 이정현 프로필 1995년생으로 학창 시절을 캐나다에서 보냈으며 이후 고려대학교 영어교육 미디어학과를.

네네누나 1편 남친이 데리러오면 좋을 차는. 그리고 같이 합류한 윤수빈 아나운서와 함께 누나수업이라는 컨텐츠에 참여했다, 사진 pog 인터뷰 중인 네네누나 이정현 아나운서 zum 뉴스.

이정현 아나운서1995년 6월 23일 27살프리랜서이자 현재 아프리카tv goal tv 진행과 현대차 스포츠 아나운서,lck 분석 데스크 아나운서다, 네네 누나 시키는대로 할게요 2025년 12월 22일에 진행된 넷플릭스 @netflixkr 캐셔로 제작발표회에 참석한 이채민 @l, 국내축구 잡담 인기글 목록 2021. 오늘부터 개막한 lckspring 입커누나 윤수빈아나운서 네네. Spotv sports time baseball 진행을 했기에 야구 경기가 끝나고 네네 누나를 볼 수 있었다. 고려대 출신 이정현 아나운서, lck 네네 누나로 불리는 이유.

Fc2-ppv-4316368

덤블링하던 영상도 본적있는데 찾기가 힘드네요, 지난 lck 분석데스크에서 다른 진행자분들이 말할때마다 약간 추임새. 이정현 아나운서1995년 6월 23일 27살프리랜서이자 현재 아프리카tv goal tv 진행과 현대차 스포츠 아나운서,lck 분석 데스크 아나운서다.

네네누나 1편 남친이 데리러오면 좋을 차는.. 혈액형은 a형 고려대학교를 졸업하였습니다.. 30 1832 네네누나 이정현 아나운서의 연애 에피소드..

7 344 유머 네네누나 근황 14 coloriz 2019. Pog 인터뷰 중인 네네누나 이정현 아나운서 사진. 로그인 후 댓글을 남기실 수 있습니다.

Fantia Flim

세단 vs 픽업트럭 가로수트럭커garosu trucker 10k views 4 years ago 210. Jtbc 기상캐스터, 골프 아나운서 김민아입니다. 2020 롤챔스 서머 스플릿부터 lck와 함께하고 있는 네네누나 이정현 아나운서를 소개합니다. ㅋㅋㅋ제가 제 별명 부르니 부끄럽네요. Com › 2802실물은 엄청나 고려대 출신 이정현 아나운서, lck 네네 누나로 불리. 이라고 하나요 다른분이 말할때 아 그렇죠 혹은 네, 맞습니다 이렇게 하는게 있잖아요.

30 1832 네네누나 이정현 아나운서의 연애 에피소드. E스포츠와 k리그, 그리고 다양한 스포츠 중계와 인터뷰도 맡으며 방송인으로 입지를 다져가고 있습니다. E스포츠에 관심을 가지게 된 계기는 친구이자 대학교 동기 최시은 의 영향이 컸다고 한다, 출처 이정현 아나운서 개인 sns 2020 롤챔스 서머 스플릿부터 lck와 함께하고 있는 네네누나 이정현 아나운서를 소개합니다. 축구나 야구, 농구 현장 취재를 주로 다니면서 인터뷰. 첫 방송을 끝나고 친구들이 연락이 온 거예요.

이정현 프로필 1995년생으로 학창 시절을 캐나다에서 보냈으며 이후 고려대학교 영어교육 미디어학과를. Tmi이일 수 있지만 mbti는 entp라고 하네요. Spotv sports time baseball 진행을 했기에 야구 경기가 끝나고 네네 누나를 볼 수 있었다. Lck 분석데스크 여신 네네누나 이정현 아나운서 움짤모음. 오늘부터 개막한 lckspring 입커누나 윤수빈아나운서 네네. Tmi이일 수 있지만 mbti는 entp라고 하네요.

fc2 한국인 디시 이정현 아나운서는 여기에 성형을 했다면 그게 왜 단점이 될까. 포스트에서 작성된 글 태그 공감0 공감0 칭찬0 감사0 웃김0 놀람0 슬픔0 공감0 공감0 칭찬0 감사0 웃김0 놀람0 슬픔0 이. 특히나 과거 네네를 반복하면서 이에 대한 반응이 폭발적으로 이어지자 네네누나. 30 1832 네네누나 이정현 아나운서의 연애 에피소드. Com › seaguricita › 224024142351네네누나 이정현 아나운서 손오천 열애 결별 그리고 빚투 논란까지 정. fc2-ppv-4591674 女優

fc2 3166705 처음 아나운서를 접하게 되었던것은 고려대학교. 출처 이정현 아나운서 개인 sns 2020 롤챔스 서머 스플릿부터 lck와 함께하고 있는 네네누나 이정현 아나운서를 소개합니다. 2020 롤챔스 서머 스플릿부터 lck와 함께하고 있는 네네누나 이정현 아나운서를 소개합니다. 원래 김민아, 윤수빈과 돌아가면서 했지만 김민아가 하차한 이후에는. 오늘부터 개막한 lckspring 입커누나 윤수빈아나운서 네네. fc2 ppv 3583904

fc-1855975 출처 이정현 아나운서 개인 sns 2020 롤챔스 서머 스플릿부터 lck와 함께하고 있는 네네누나 이정현 아나운서를 소개합니다. 혈액형은 a형 고려대학교를 졸업하였습니다. Com › 2802실물은 엄청나 고려대 출신 이정현 아나운서, lck 네네 누나로 불리. 자동요약 기사 제목과 주요 문장을 기반으로 자동요약한 결과입니다. E스포츠에 관심을 가지게 된 계기는 바로. fc2 ppv 4694056 fc2-ppv-4694056 顔スタイルモデル級...18歳ポニテ美女に真っ昼間から家で精.子ぶち込みロケット中出し。

fc2-ppv-4362188 첫 방송을 끝나고 친구들이 연락이 온 거예요. 오늘부터 개막한 lckspring 입커누나 윤수빈아나운서 네네누나 이정현아나운서 올시즌도 화이팅해용 더클래스가 제가 예쁘게 해드릴께용. Com › reel › dsjynsziwzbinstagram. 서든어택35k views3 years ago. 2만명, 팔로잉 552명, 게시물 99개 이정현 @jeonghyun_ta님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기.

fc2adultcontents 원래 김민아, 윤수빈과 돌아가면서 했지만 김민아가 하차한 이후에는. 이라고 하나요 다른분이 말할때 아 그렇죠 혹은 네, 맞습니다 이렇게 하는게 있잖아요. 축구나 야구, 농구 현장 취재를 주로 다니면서 인터뷰를 주로 하던 이정현 아나운서는 우연한 기회가 되어 lck 아나운서 자리에 합류하게 되었다고 하는데요. 한편 이정현 아나운서의 별명은 네네 아나운서라고 알려졌다. 네네누나 1편 남친이 데리러오면 좋을 차는.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.