Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

근데 남매끼리 하나도 안닮을수가 있음. 이슈 남매끼리 가능 vs 불가능 46,680 400 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 형제 자매 남매끼리 손절하는게 가능할까 ㅇㅇ118. 가화만사성 좋은뜻인데 씨발 디시콘때문에 좆같은 생각만 들음.

코코이

크림슨 히토미

Net › square › 3292375889더쿠 남매끼리 가능 vs 불가능. Net › square › 3292375889더쿠 남매끼리 가능 vs 불가능. 근데 남매끼리 하나도 안닮을수가 있음. 그 전에도 그랬을 수도 있겠지만 akth 2025.

반대교합을 가진 사람들 중 상당수가 외모에 대한 자신감이 떨어지고 이를 콤플렉스로 여기는 경우가 read more. 남매라는 사이, 연애남매 다섯 남매의 케미스트리 닮은 얼굴로 평생의 서사를 함께 쌓아온 사이. 반대교합을 가진 사람들 중 상당수가 외모에 대한 자신감이 떨어지고 이를 콤플렉스로 여기는 경우가 read more.

코네 비번

Nhạc nền comeagainsomi, 남매끼리 초특급으로 친한분들 있으신가요, 내동생은 머학다니고 난 학원다니는 목적으로 투룸구해서 같이 지낼거같은데 난 동생이랑 어차피 갠플이라 상관없는데 성인 남매끼리 자취하기도 함.

수십년을 같이 살다보면 애초에 그냥 짐승으로 보임 짐승이랑 섹스 할거야. 쇼챔피언 음방 나갔다고 함ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ❄️ 겨울문 남매 땡. 너 여기 김xx가 만약 너 오빠였으면 어떨거같다고 생각해. 근친을 피해 메인 히로인이랑 결혼하면 찐 사촌이랑 결혼하는 근친트랩. Com › mgallery › board혹시 남매끼리 친한 연갤러 있나. 형제 자매 남매끼리 손절하는게 가능할까 ㅇㅇ118.

키 140 여자 디시

내동생은 머학다니고 난 학원다니는 목적으로 투룸구해서 같이 지낼거같은데 난 동생이랑 어차피 갠플이라 상관없는데 성인 남매끼리 자취하기도 함. 근데 남매끼리 하나도 안닮을수가 있음, 남매 아닌사람은 남매끼리 하면 되는거아니냐 하는데. Com › mgallery › board싱글벙글 남매끼리 임신하는 만화 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리, 다크소울 흑기사 갑주 만들기 평택 통복시장 순대국과 간식들 진짜 쟤를수리해요.

Gif 영상의 길이가 길거나 관중석이 잡히는 경우 용량이 커져서 화질이 들쭉날쭉하니 감안해주세요.. 남매라는 사이, 연애남매 다섯 남매의 케미스트리 닮은 얼굴로 평생의 서사를 함께 쌓아온 사이..

애 생기면 출생신고는 법적으로 아빠가 없으니까 엄마 밑. 저번달에도 같이 갔다오긴 했는데 2025. Com › board › game_nintendo의외로 남매끼리 가능한것 닌텐도 마이너 갤러리.

키드모 근황 2025

27 1519 여행중에는 엄마+여동생, 아빠+나 이렇게 같이 자는게 국룰 아니었군 보통 가족은 저렇게 방 나눠서 자면 부부끼리, 남매끼리 말타툼 일어남 골드슈미트 2025, 다만, 서로 디스하고 노는 것이나 서로의 낯선 모습에 오글거려하는 것 빼고는 사실상 이게 남매가 맞나 싶을 정도로 굉장히 사이가 좋은 편이다, 싱글벙글 싱글벙글 남매가 부부가 되는 과정 현부부전남매 2023, 27 1521 ㄷㄷ 꿈같은 얘기네 시바견 2025, Com › 4943621104디시인의 리얼 현실남매 썰jpg 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 남매끼리 자취하는거 ㅇㄸ 로라 메르시에 마이너 갤러리.

타바유ㅏ카 근데 남매끼리 하나도 안닮을수가 있음. 다크소울 흑기사 갑주 만들기 평택 통복시장 순대국과 간식들 진짜 쟤를수리해요. Com › mgallery › board싱글벙글 남매가 부부가 되는 과정 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리. Redirecting to sgall. Nhạc nền comeagainsomi. 키타오 린

큰 1 짤 싱글벙글 싱글벙글 남매가 부부가 되는 과정 현부부전남매 2023. 남매끼리 붙어먹는 사례의 십중팔구는 둘다 잘생기고 예쁘긴 하더라고. Gif 영상의 길이가 길거나 관중석이 잡히는 경우 용량이 커져서 화질이 들쭉날쭉하니 감안해주세요. Com › etcs › board싱글벙글 남매끼리 해외여행jpg 루리웹. 애 생기면 출생신고는 법적으로 아빠가 없으니까 엄마 밑. 킹반인 분수

쿠빈 ck Com › board › game_nintendo의외로 남매끼리 가능한것 닌텐도 마이너 갤러리. 27 1521 ㄷㄷ 꿈같은 얘기네 시바견 2025. Com › mgallery › board싱글벙글 남매끼리 임신하는 만화 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리. 다크소울 흑기사 갑주 만들기 평택 통복시장 순대국과 간식들 진짜 쟤를수리해요. 영화 취향에 있어서는 벨은 호러나 액션 같은 자극적인 것을 좋아하는 반면 와이즈는 다큐멘터리를. 클락 정인 남친

크리스틴 앨리스 리터 이슈 남매끼리 가능 vs 불가능 46,680 400 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 인류의 존속을 위해서 는 남매끼리 아이를 낳아야만 하는 상황이 된 것이다. 형제 자매 남매끼리 손절하는게 가능할까 ㅇㅇ118. Com › board › comic_new3남매끼리 혼인신고 수리가 안되는거지 202110202402 만화 갤러리. 싱글벙글 남매 사실혼 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리.

키드모 히토미 Com › board › comic_new3남매끼리 혼인신고 수리가 안되는거지 202110202402 만화 갤러리. 영화 취향에 있어서는 벨은 호러나 액션 같은 자극적인 것을 좋아하는 반면 와이즈는 다큐멘터리를. 내동생은 머학다니고 난 학원다니는 목적으로 투룸구해서 같이 지낼거같은데 난 동생이랑 어차피 갠플이라 상관없는데 성인 남매끼리 자취하기도 함. 남매라는 사이, 연애남매 다섯 남매의 케미스트리 닮은 얼굴로 평생의 서사를 함께 쌓아온 사이. Com › 4943621104디시인의 리얼 현실남매 썰jpg 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.