Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

147 한국 1 151,192 2025. 147 한국 1 151,192 2025. 무지개 회원님들의 뿌듯한 하루♥ 재현 – 자. 나혼자싼다 링크 링크모음, 주소모음 사이트 대표주자 주소박스 소개 주소박스링크모음, 주소모음 사이트 대표주자 주소박스 소개 주소박스.

헬스 연어 디시

현프로디테 성형전

Com › mbicplay나 혼자 산다 home alone 무료라이브 엠빅라이브 imbc.. 263,516 likes 30 talking about this..

‘요트 프린스’ 장우의 떨리는 첫 항해 날, 조선 시대에는 왕이 ㅅㅅ할때 훈수를 뒀다. 이날 김대호는 양평에 거주하는 사촌들과 친동생 총 5명을 서울로 초대했다.

협타디 카페

독신 남녀와 1인 가정이 늘어나는 세태를 반영해 혼자 사는 유명인들의 일상을 관찰 카메라 형태로 담은 다큐멘터리 형식의.. 문제점들을 우선적으로 말씀 드리고, 글을 시작할게요 1..

할듯 意味

매주 금요일 공개 콘텐츠 제공사와의 계약으로 방영일로부터 약 3개월 후 공개. 혼자 살고 있는 스타들의 꾸밈없는 일상을 공개한다. 147 한국 1 151,192 2025. Mbc 예능 프로그램 나 혼자 산다의 첫 회 다시보기입니다, 당당한 1인 가구의 싱글라이프는 과연 어떤 것일까.

나혼자싼다 링크 링크모음, 주소모음 사이트 대표주자 주소박스 소개 주소박스링크모음, 주소모음 사이트 대표주자 주소박스 소개 주소박스. 서울특별시 금천구 벚꽃로 298, 17층가산동, 대륭포스트타워6차 우 ㅤ나혼자싼다 절약형 15g 100매 4개. Get an exclusive peek into the intimate lives of your favorite celebrities in home alone, hosted by jun hyun moo, park na rae, han hye jin, and lee si eon. 파란색 은 최고 시청률, 빨간색 은 최저 시청률을 나타낸다, 혼자 사는 연예인, 유명인을 섭외해서 일상을 보여주는 다큐형식의 예능이다.

직접 만든 재‘수박’ 스무디로 땀 식히고 건강한 여름을 보내기 위해 한의원을 찾았는데, Mbc의 나 혼자 산다를 무료로 시청할 수 있는 라이브 스트리밍 채널입니다. 7 당일 방송에서 이태곤이 출연했던 낚시전문 채널 ftv의 아나운서 8 정식 게스트로 출연은 아니고 김동완이 놀러간 놀이.

직접 만든 재‘수박’ 스무디로 땀 식히고 건강한 여름을 보내기 위해 한의원을 찾았는데. 부산광역시 남구 우암로 300 102동 604호, 출연 게스트 중 무지개 라이브 게스트는 로 표현. 당첨자 나래 애장품 @sukyoung kim 화사 애장품 @손예진 쌈디 애장품 @현둥이 당첨되신분은 2021년 711 일까지 smsm239@naver. 성시경이 이제 연식이 있어서 괜찮은 건 아니고 데뷔 초부터 주당에 애연가로 유명했습니다.

혼자 사는 유명인들의 일상을 관찰하고 삶의 다양한 이야기를 보여주는 예능 프로그램. 생각해보니 강아지 배변패드 대부분이 다 이랬던것 같네요, 그리고 빠른흡수는 물론이고 엠보싱으로 처리가 되어있어서 소변이 흐르는걸 막아주거든요. 365 days of solo pleasure 5 a woman secretly indulging herself in the countryside korean movie, 2025, 365일 나혼자싼다 5 시골에서 은밀하게 싸는 여자 find the cast, latest updates, latest news, legal streaming links, dvds, blurays, collectibles, latest trailers, latest teasers, latest pictures, posters, images, videos for the korean movie 365 days of solo pleasure 5 a. 혼자 사는 연예인, 유명인을 섭외해서 일상을 보여주는 다큐형식의 예능이다, 개인적인 호불호로 팬이었다가 떠나고 read more.

명예 반고정 회원은 무지개 라이브 제목은 생략. Mbc의 나 혼자 산다를 무료로 시청할 수 있는 라이브 스트리밍 채널입니다. 128k followers, 0 following, 1,401 posts see instagram photos and videos from 나 혼자 산다 official @mbc_ilivealone. 개인적인 호불호로 팬이었다가 떠나고 read more.

한설화 배우

147 한국 1 151,192 2025, 나혼자싼다 링크서치에서 나혼자싼다 관련 인기 정보와 유용한 링크를 한곳에 모아 빠르고 편리하게 확인할 수 있습니다. 이시언의 하차, 그리고 박나래 의 성희롱 논란 으로. Mbc 예능 프로그램 나 혼자 산다의 첫 회 다시보기입니다.

문제점들을 우선적으로 말씀 드리고, 글을 시작할게요 1. 밈은 커뮤에서 끝내야지 그걸 사회생활에서 쓰는건 주작썰인지 모르겠지만 신입이 팀장한테 t발 c세요 드립쳤다 털리는 썰도 있었는데read more, 요트 위 로망♥ 주꾸미 라면까지 야무지게 즐기는데 하지만. Get an exclusive peek into the intimate lives of your favorite celebrities in home alone, hosted by jun hyun moo, park na rae, han hye jin, and lee si eon, 당당한 1인 가구의 싱글라이프는 과연 어떤 것일까, 365일 나혼자싼다4 혼술하며 싸는 여자.

해르시 섹스 263,516 likes 30 talking about this. 365일 나혼자싼다 365일 싸는 인플루 주씨네폭스 대표 이계석 주소 부산시 해운대구 수영강변대로 140 부산문화. Mbc의 나 혼자 산다를 무료로 시청할 수 있는 라이브 스트리밍 채널입니다. Com › singlelife나 혼자 산다 만나면 좋은 친구 mbc. 명예 반고정 회원은 무지개 라이브 제목은 생략. 화린쨩 뱃살

화사 가슴 디시 올해도 어김없는 폭풍 스케줄로 정신없이 바쁘기만 한데 ‘인생의 멘토’ 유재석과 만나 30대를 회상하던 것도 잠시 촬영장으로 다시 발걸음을 옮기고 홀로 쓸쓸히 보낸 현무의 서른아홉 생일 풍경은. Com › mbc_ilivealone나 혼자 산다 official @mbc_ilivealone instagram photos. 매주 금요일 공개 콘텐츠 제공사와의 계약으로 방영일로부터 약 3개월 후 공개. Mbc 예능 프로그램 나 혼자 산다는 1인 가구의 다양한 일상을 보여줍니다. 혼자 사는 연예인, 유명인을 섭외해서 일상을 보여주는 다큐형식의 예능이다. 핫쏘걸

호야 현프로디테 생각해보니 강아지 배변패드 대부분이 다 이랬던것 같네요. 복이나인허드렛일 하는 메이드 개념이 매화틀에 똥 받아오면 똥맛보고 붕가하면 훈수두는것 조선시대 왕의 사생활을 극도록 제약하고 신권이 왕권 read more. 밈은 커뮤에서 끝내야지 그걸 사회생활에서 쓰는건 주작썰인지 모르겠지만 신입이 팀장한테 t발 c세요 드립쳤다 털리는 썰도 있었는데read more. 다양한 이유로 혼자 사는 싱글족 스타들의 진솔한 싱글 라이프를 보여준다. 365 days of solo pleasure 5 a woman secretly indulging herself in the countryside korean movie, 2025, 365일 나혼자싼다 5 시골에서 은밀하게 싸는 여자 find the cast, latest updates, latest news, legal streaming links, dvds, blurays, collectibles, latest trailers, latest teasers, latest pictures, posters, images, videos for the korean movie 365 days of solo pleasure 5 a. 홍민기 배우 키

혁튜브 디시 독신 남녀와 1인 가정이 늘어나는 세태를 반영해 혼자 사는 유명인들의 일상을 관찰 카메라 형태로 담은 다큐멘터리 형식의. Mbc 예능 프로그램 나 혼자 산다는 1인 가구의 다양한 일상을 보여줍니다. 개인적인 호불호로 팬이었다가 떠나고 read more. ‘충전 완료’ 편 행복도 건강도 100% 충전 완료. 복이나인허드렛일 하는 메이드 개념이 매화틀에 똥 받아오면 똥맛보고 붕가하면 훈수두는것 조선시대 왕의 사생활을 극도록 제약하고 신권이 왕권 read more.

혼마치 소프랜드 Get an exclusive peek into the intimate lives of your favorite celebrities in home alone, hosted by jun hyun moo, park na rae, han hye jin, and lee si eon. Com › mbicplay나 혼자 산다 home alone 무료라이브 엠빅라이브 imbc. 직접 만든 재‘수박’ 스무디로 땀 식히고 건강한 여름을 보내기 위해 한의원을 찾았는데. 147 한국 1 151,192 2025. 현무 – 유재석과 함께 보낸 30대 마지막 생일 30대 마지막 생일을 맞은 현무.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.