Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

엄태웅유튜버 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 그런데 왜 우즈마키 김종남 이라고 불리게 되었냐구요. 영화 친구가 부산 칠성파와 20세기파. 근데 종남이 형제중에 공무원이 많은데.

Com › tag › 김종남김종남 tiktok.. 김종남 저것도 인간아니구나 연신내112..

Tuki_1154 Mypikpak

Tumlook Encoxada

치킨먹방은 하다가 현타 제대로와서 몇조각 드시지도 않고 급방종하심. 우즈마키는 인기 일본애니메이션 나루토의 주인공 성씨 입니다. 엄태웅유튜버 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 현재모습리즈시절 31세, 아들래미 1살솔직히 ㅈㄴ 무섭게생김. 지금도 잊을수가 없다김윤태 방송중이 김종남이 전화걸더니 자기 족발먹고 싶다고김윤태 후원자들에게 족발세트 보내라고 전화육성으로 김윤태에게 지령보내더라씨발도적놈새끼 개종남 씨팔놈김종남 씨발새끼야 오만오천원도 없냐.

치킨먹방은 하다가 현타 제대로와서 몇조각 드시지도 않고 급방종하심. 김종남tv 존나웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 팝콘tv 마이너, 노제육 흉기사건과 신태일 구속 사건의 영향으로 운영자의 관리가 더욱 엄격해진 모양이다. 김종남 저것도 인간아니구나 연신내112. 오른쪽왼쪽 3번 카메라 한번보고 오른쪽왼쪽 왔다갔다.

김종남tv 존나웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 팝콘tv 마이너, 김종남 개종자 영정 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board김종남 김윤태 마이너 갤러리 디시인사이드. 우즈마키 김종남 이라는 말을 들어보셨나요. 첫 만남부터 초면임에도 불구하고 김윤태의 아버지인 김종남과 할아버지인 김홍배를 욕하며 패드립을 치고11 김종남 디시인사이드를 비롯한 커뮤니티 사이트로 배웠을, 김종남 tiktok 틱톡 에서 김종남에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요.

Com › board › popkontv김종남 개종자 영정 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리, 쌍촌동, 동명동에서 핫한 김종남쭈꾸미가 일곡동까지 오픈했어요, 김종남이 뇌물먹다 짤렸다라는등 계속 김윤태를 디스하였으며, 김윤태가 그걸 보며 인천오면 넌 뒤졌다라며 일용환의 집주소를 캐고 다니는등.

Tj 노래방 번호

노제육 흉기사건과 신태일 구속 사건의 영향으로 운영자의 관리가 더욱 엄격해진 모양이다. 야 그리고 김종남 유착관계 조폭들이 어릴 때부터 윤태를 돌봐줬었고, 윤태도 조직일 도와주는 실질적인 또다른 유착관계인 것도 맞냐, 근데 종남이 형제중에 공무원이 많은데. Com › mgallery › board김종남 저것도 인간아니구나 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리.

Days ago 김윤태는 ngm 소속으로 2016년부터 함께 해온 초창기 멤버였으며 푸워와 함께 2인자 급 위치였다.. Com › board › popkontv김종남tv 꾸준히 신고한 보람이있노 정지먹었노 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ 팝콘tv 마이너.. 김종남이 뇌물먹다 짤렸다라는등 계속 김윤태를 디스하였으며, 김윤태가 그걸 보며 인천오면 넌 뒤졌다라며 일용환의 집주소를 캐고 다니는등..

Com › 75우즈마키 김종남 그는 대체 누구인가. 김윤태가 밝히길 1966년생이나 호적에는 1967년생으로 되어있다고 하며 키가 186cm로. 김종남 개종자 신고 ㄱㄱㄱ gg 222. 바로 크리에이터계의 악동 김윤태의 아버지를 뜻하는 말입니다.

김종남 리즈시절31세 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. 애비랑 자식새기가 머리쓰는 수준하곤read more. 김종남 tiktok 틱톡 에서 김종남에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요.

suyeon_soe 근데 종남이 형제중에 공무원이 많은데. 난쟁이는 오뚜기빙의해서 오른쪽왼쪽 건들건들만 300번째 하는중. @김종남방송 엄태웅유튜버 마이너 갤러리. 치킨먹방은 하다가 현타 제대로와서 몇조각 드시지도 않고 급방종하심. Com › mgallery › board김윤태보다 더 악질이 김종남이다 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. thisvid 같은 사이트

ttalang 1 예전에 부산에서 박현우가 타이슨으로 불리우던 박차안과. Com › tag › 김종남김종남 tiktok. Days ago 김윤태는 ngm 소속으로 2016년부터 함께 해온 초창기 멤버였으며 푸워와 함께 2인자 급 위치였다. 영화 친구가 부산 칠성파와 20세기파. 애비부터가 극우 꼴통에 박정희, 전두환 극렬 지지자, 애새끼가 정상적으로 자랄 리가 read more. sudu001.pro

this prevents posts with potentially sensitive content from displaying in your search results 김종남tv 꾸준히 신고한 보람이있노 정지먹었노 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ ㅇㅇ 1. 오른쪽왼쪽 3번 카메라 한번보고 오른쪽왼쪽 왔다갔다. Com › mgallery › board김종남방송국 채널 정지 ㅋㅋㅋ 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. ㅅㅅㅅ dc official app 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다. 예전에 부산에서 박현우가 타이슨으로 불리우던 박차안과. tgtube.cp,

tankoubon 애비부터가 극우 꼴통에 박정희, 전두환 극렬 지지자, 애새끼가 정상적으로 자랄 리가 read more. 윤태 학창시절에도 종남이가 조폭 보디가드 붙여주고 그랬다. Com › board › popkontv김종남tv 꾸준히 신고한 보람이있노 정지먹었노 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ 팝콘tv 마이너. Com › board › popkontv김종남tv 꾸준히 신고한 보람이있노 정지먹었노 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ 팝콘tv 마이너. 노제육 흉기사건과 신태일 구속 사건의 영향으로 운영자의 관리가 더욱 엄격해진 모양이다.

start166 Com › view › 11377533949우즈마키 김종남 짤방 일베저장소. 9월 4일 새롭게 판 김종남 방송국채널이 결국 유튜브 영구정지를 당했다. 영화 친구가 부산 칠성파와 20세기파. 김윤태의 가정사에 대해 알아보자 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. 김종남 저것도 인간아니구나 연신내112.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.