김동완 1935년 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Explore 김동완s archive on studiowans youtube channel for engaging content and insights. 김동완 가수 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Kbs 해피투게더3에 출연하여 22살 학생 여자친구와 연애하고 있다고 밝혔으나 후에 라디오 스타에서 헤어졌다고 언급한 바 있다. 가수 김동완과 함께하는 치악산국립공원 종주 2부 영상앨범 산.

Kimdongwan @kdw_fever instagram photos and videos.. 김동완의 오늘의 운세 2026년 1월 30일 48년생 욕심을 줄이면 편안해진다..

김동완 1958년 은 충남 당진시의 제19대 대한민국 국회의원이다.

현재 신화 내에서 음악과 안무 등 전반적인 조율을 담당하고 있으며, 김동완 은 멜론과의 인터뷰에서 신화 10집을 준비하면서 음악적으로 애매한 부분이 있으면 전적으로 이민우와 에릭 의 의견을 따른다고 밝혔다.

김동완은 14일 새벽 자신의 sns에 전 당신이 어떻게든 피드에 뜨는 게 싫어요.. 미업에서는 전량 톤블랙에 다 보내게 돼 1kg도 가지고.. Com › entertainments › broadcast47세 김동완, 이민우 이어 결혼 준비&mldr.. 음악, 드라마, 영화, 연극, 뮤지컬을 오가며 만능엔터테이너로 활동하고 있는 김동완은 1998년 그룹 신화로 데뷔 후 현재까지 큰 사랑을 받고 있다..

Join Facebook To Connect With 김동완 And Others You May Know.

국내 최고의 사주명리학자 김동완 교수가 말하는 ‘운명을 바꾸는 관상 2013년 900만 관객을 돌파하며 많은 사랑을 받은 영화 ‘관상’에는 아주 유명한 대사가 나온다.

그룹 활동과 함께 ‘손수건’, ‘비밀’, ‘약속’, ‘i’m fine‘ 등 솔로 가수로서 발자취를 남겼다. 이 일출만큼이나 환하고 아름다운 한 해가 되시기를 기원합니다. 서울대학교 대학원 의학과 의학박사 1998, 47세 김동완, 이민우 이어 결혼 준비드디어 좋은 소식 전했다라스 스포츠조선 정빛 기자 김동완이 신화 멤버 이민우의 깜짝 결혼 소식에 대한 솔직한 속내를 밝힌다, Mv kim dong wan 김동완 _ im fineenglish subtitles are now available.

서울대학교 대학원 의학과 의학박사 1998. 1972년 4월 그는 《mbc 모닝쇼》에서 일기예보를 담당하며 방송 활동을 시작하였다, 서윤아와 하차 맞았나김동완 결혼 못한다 결론 의미심장 돌싱포맨 핫피플 osen김수형 기자 돌싱포맨에서 김동완이 지난해 서윤아와 핑크빛 커플 모드를 보였던 가운데, 최근 결혼을 포기하게 된 속마음을 전해 눈길을 끌었다, ジャンルを超えた実力派ミュージシャンが紡ぐ、 「愛の歌の贈りもの」。 いま恋をしているあなたへ。 特別な想いを込めて歌います。 ✨ 公演詳細は後日発表いたします ⸻.

바코드 자위 김동완 1935년 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 새해 새벽, 구룡산에서 본 정경입니다. 이 일출만큼이나 환하고 아름다운 한 해가 되시기를 기원합니다. He has been acting since 2002, and has starred in television dramas such as a farewell to sorrow and children of heaven. 김동완의 오늘의 운세 2026년 1월 30일 twig. 박지 호르몬

바키 공룡 Kr › person_view스타박스 김동완 신화가수. 25k followers, 39 following, 59 posts kimdongwan @kdw_fever on instagram. 지난 11일 김동완은 사회관계망서비스에 되지도 않는 출산율 걱정보다. 성씨가 김, 이름이 동완인 인물을 정리한 문서. 🔥 kbs2 독수리 5형제를 부탁해. 박준일 영서

배우별 사이트 가수 김동완과 함께하는 치악산국립공원 종주 2부 영상앨범 산 kbs 20240915 방송 치악산은 영서 지방의 명산이며 강원특별자치도 원주시의 명산. 서윤아와 하차 맞았나김동완 결혼 못한다 결론 의미심장 돌싱포맨 핫피플 osen김수형 기자 돌싱포맨에서 김동완이 지난해 서윤아와 핑크빛 커플 모드를 보였던 가운데, 최근 결혼을 포기하게 된 속마음을 전해 눈길을 끌었다. 신화 출신 배우 김동완 되지도 않는 출산율 걱정보다 청년. Single 2008 read more. 에너지 재료 연구실energy materials laboratory, eml에서는 에너지 저장 및 기능성나노 소재 변환에 관한 연구. 박제 sotwe

박채원 디시 김동완은 14일 새벽 자신의 sns에 전 당신이 어떻게든 피드에 뜨는 게 싫어요. 태어나서 얼마안되서 서울 강남구 대치동으로 이사해서 성장했다. Explore 김동완s archive on studiowans youtube channel for engaging content and insights. 김동완 역시 이민우, 에릭과 함께 작곡을 하는 멤버이다. 지난 11일 김동완은 사회관계망서비스에 되지도 않는 출산율 걱정보다.

박제 갤러리 Kim dong wan @kdw_official posts x. 김동완과 전진이 함께하는 제주도 여행기. 박명수 에게 뽀뽀 금지가 사실이냐라고 묻는 등의 행동을 봐서 날카로운 외모와. 대한민국 제1호 기상캐스터로 알려진 김동완 전 기상청 기상통보관이 15일 별세했다. 김동완작가는 충청북도 청주의 국내인물,명리학자 입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.