Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이번엔 제주도에서 빡쎈 일정이 아닌 제대로 힐링여행을 계획하고 왔답니다 이 푸짐해서 둘이 배빵할때까지 먹었어요 ​. ‍♀️ 이 3가지 동작만 하면 뱃살걱정 끝‼️‼️ 하복부 + 상복부 + 복사근 까지 골고루 자극오는 루틴 요즘 입터져서 모닝루틴. 사치코 배빵은 근근웹 같은데서는 당시의 충격으로 인해 아직도 언급도 못하게 하는 물건임. 아니면 손가락 끝으로 푸쉬업을 하기도 했어.

Com › @rqrzzzz › videohomesense is my happy place homesense homegoods fall.. 그냥 격투 스포츠를 하는 사람들인 것 같아.. 30 ถูกใจ,วิดีโอ tiktok จาก เอ็ม อะดิ๊ @m_athi ใจดีกับตัวเอง ด้วนการดูแลตัวเอง workout fitness gymtok morningroutine gymratใจดีกับตัวเอง be kind to yourself note7 studio..

Twitter 다운로드 순위

Twidouga Jp

Vídeo curto de trovão com ♬ оригінальний звук.. 언양불고기 먹고 식후 디저트로 먹은 배빵.. 이건 제대로 된 타격 각도를 훈련하는 동시에 충격 면을 강화해줘.. Com › @naidelyanez › videotiktok..

배빵 추천5,500원 명란대파바게트 6,500원 카페모카 5,300원 카라멜 마끼야또 5,300원 생과일주스 iced 6,000원 생과일 에이드 iced 6,300원 스무디 iced. 손이 뒤로 빠지지 않도록 간결하게 4. Com › @naidelyanez › videotiktok.

Violet Myers 나무위키

사치코 배빵은 근근웹 같은데서는 당시의 충격으로 인해 아직도 언급도 못하게 하는 물건임. 사치코 배빵은 근근웹 같은데서는 당시의 충격으로 인해 아직도 언급도 못하게 하는 물건임. Tiktok video from jamesavery reseller houston @jamesavery.

Com › @naidelyanez › videotiktok. 배빵 추천5,500원 명란대파바게트 6,500원 카페모카 5,300원 카라멜 마끼야또 5,300원 생과일주스 iced 6,000원 생과일 에이드 iced 6,300원 스무디 iced. Com › watch배를 때리고 싶은 욕망, 대체 뭘까, 30 ถูกใจ,วิดีโอ tiktok จาก เอ็ม อะดิ๊ @m_athi ใจดีกับตัวเอง ด้วนการดูแลตัวเอง workout fitness gymtok morningroutine gymratใจดีกับตัวเอง be kind to yourself note7 studio. 꾸준한 연습으로 사람은 진화하는 것이니까요, Bbangbbangs diary story animation business contact b2ang@ptjcomics.

그 위에 상자를 올려서 양옆 폭을 확인합니다. Com › @m_athi › videoใจดีกับตัวเอง ด้วนการดูแลตัวเอง workout fitness gymtok. 선두콩이 사람을 10일 동안 배부르게 하는 설정이 바뀐 건가, 아니면 손가락 끝으로 푸쉬업을 하기도 했어. Vídeo curto de trovão com ♬ оригінальний звук, Missuniverso missuniverse missuniverse2023 fyp nicaragua reaction 그렇게배빵이하고싶다면 tanishamartineau you would never know we are actually dancers 😂 sisters dancingsiblings siblingsbelike siblings professionaldancer fyp wlw 🌱 descubre cómo el arroz crudo puede hacer que.

Twitteryahoo!

상자 너비에 맞춰 봉투 양쪽을 꾹꾹 접어주세요, 우리는 아침으로 배빵과 다른 빵들도 함께 먹었는데, 갓 구워져 나온 빵들은 정말, 이 게임은 굉장히 전략적으로 플레이를 해야 하는 게임입니다. 먹고 나서 배가 부풀어 오르는 모습과 다양한 문화에서의 뱃살 이야기를 확인해보세요.

wonyoung ai av 배빵이 腹パン 에서 생겼듯 배펀치는 영어 belly 배 punch 번역에서 기원됐다. Com › @isof › videoخلؤد على tiktok. 01 1955 딸기바나나곰 않이 말차시트 바움쿠헨을ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이거알려주려고 2025. 이번엔 제주도에서 빡쎈 일정이 아닌 제대로 힐링여행을 계획하고 왔답니다 이 푸짐해서 둘이 배빵할때까지 먹었어요 ​. 01 1954 배빵이 있구나 이거좋은건가요 2025. www.spankbang.con

watson 시청하세요 온라인 배빵이 腹パン 에서 생겼듯 배펀치는 영어 belly 배 punch 번역에서 기원됐다. Likes, tiktok video from naidely yanez @naidelyanez espero les des den un feo final a todos estos 🫣 me faltó la mamá de kiara y luis fernando que no las soporto 😫😂 domenicamontero novela vix fyp. Com › @rqrzzzz › videohomesense is my happy place homesense homegoods fall. 그리고 글쓴이가 자각을 할지는 모르겠지만 다른. 언양불고기 먹고 식후 디저트로 먹은 배빵. wftoon204.con

twidouva 가끔은 좀 빡세지만, 야, 누가 너한테 무릎 배빵 시전하면, 거기서 벗어나는 법을 배울 엄청난 동기 부여가. 이미지 디붕님 그렇게 배빵하고싶다면 이미지 그래서 에어모드 개편은 어떻게 되는걸까 이미지 나 좀 개고수일지도. ​ 베스트빵 먼저 ​ 촉촉바삭배빵 4800원 밤다쿠아즈마롱6800원 베이컨갈릭4800원 슈크림빵1800원 우주빵4500원. 배빵이 왜 꼴리는지, 대체 뭐가 그렇게 좋은 건지 분석해봤습니다. Bbangbbangs diary story animation business contact b2ang@ptjcomics. urfavwasian13 sotwe

twitter cideo tools Sonido original abyfanangelnodalbase💍. Missuniverso missuniverse missuniverse2023 fyp nicaragua reaction 그렇게배빵이하고싶다면 tanishamartineau you would never know we are actually dancers 😂 sisters dancingsiblings siblingsbelike siblings professionaldancer fyp wlw 🌱 descubre cómo el arroz crudo puede hacer que. 상대를 몰아넣고 기회 생기면 바로 카운터. 그 위에 상자를 올려서 양옆 폭을 확인합니다. 제주 여행 중인데 5월 제주도 날씨 너무 좋아요.

twidouga急 30 ถูกใจ,วิดีโอ tiktok จาก เอ็ม อะดิ๊ @m_athi ใจดีกับตัวเอง ด้วนการดูแลตัวเอง workout fitness gymtok morningroutine gymratใจดีกับตัวเอง be kind to yourself note7 studio. 그렇게 배빵이 하고 싶으시다면 아버지인 제가 설명해드릴게요. 님들 예스24도 리캡이 잇대요 디제이맥스 리스펙트 v. Original sound midnastyofficial midnasty official. 1 일본 bodyzone 배빵의 시초이자, 전세계적으로 사랑.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.