Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이는 과거 성현아 등이 누드화보로 벌어들인 수익을 훨씬 뛰어넘는 액수로 가히 권민중 누드신드롬이 일고 있다고 할 수 있다. 1년간 폐인 불타는 청춘 한정수 고백한 故김주혁. 2017년 kbs 2tv 1 대 100 2017년 jtbc 여행수다 나를 찾아줘 2018년 kbs 1tv 우리말 겨루기 2021년 유튜브 권민중라디오 2021년 채널a 나는 몸신이다 2021년 jtbc 《친절한 진료실》 2022년 jtbc 《tv정보쇼 알짜왕》. 풋풋돋음신인 시절 박신양, 심은하와 집 앞 키스하다 딱 걸린.

통일교갤

토 스미 가격 디시

탬 탬버린 실물 썰

이번에 새친구와 함께 권민중 재출연을 하게됩니다.. 07 사랑한다면 1회 연기의 신 박신양, 심은하와 집 앞 키스하다 딱 걸린.. 파격적인 누드사진으로 화제 모으는 영화배우 권민중.. 2017년 kbs 2tv 1 대 100 2017년 jtbc 여행수다 나를 찾아줘 2018년 kbs 1tv 우리말 겨루기 2021년 유튜브 권민중라디오 2021년 채널a 나는 몸신이다 2021년 jtbc 《친절한 진료실》 2022년 jtbc 《tv정보쇼 알짜왕》..

한편 이날 강경헌 권민중은 동갑내기 친구의 끝없는 수다로 김부용의 고막을 힘들게 했다, 너무나 오랜만에 불청에 나왔지만, 나이 때문에 조금 꼬이는 모습을 보여주기도 했는데요, 새친구와 함께 앞으로 어떤 모습을 보여줄지 기대가 됩니다, 불타는 청춘 강경헌의 무한 수다에 고통 호소 sbs. 그녀의 노출 수준에 관심이 쏠리는 것은 두 말할. 한편 이날 강경헌 권민중은 동갑내기 친구의 끝없는 수다로 김부용의 고막을 힘들게 했다.

트위터 로리

강경헌은 이상형 토크에서 내가 항상 말하는 외모 이상형이, 불타는 청춘 강경헌의 무한 수다에 고통 호소 sbs. 투캅스3는 1,2편에 이어 여전히 여성을 비하한다는 비난을 면 치못할 것 같다, 불청 김민우 히트곡&청춘들의 트로트 열창불뽕 노래자랑.

Com › talk › 240843권민중 누드도 연기다. 그녀의 노출 수준에 관심이 쏠리는 것은 두 말할. 그 이후 가방에서 지갑이 없어진 김광규는 권민중을 의심한다.

트위터 동영상 저장하기

이게 투캅스 시리즈중 유일하게 19세 관람가였고 권민중 올누드 샤워신에 마지막에 김보성이 있는 욕탕에 누드로 들어가는 장면이 나오고 베드신도 있었죠. 권민중, 김광규에 업어달라 요구했다가 지갑 도둑으로 몰린 사연. Caprier20230814 0248ip 112, 권민중, 나이 무색 근황투캅스3 시절 모습, 1996 미스코리아 선발대회 19960525 1996년 미스코리아 선발대회, 야무진 충북진 권민중의 포부.

토우지 디시 권민중, 김광규에 업어달라 요구했다가 지갑 도둑으로 몰린 사연. 2017년 kbs 2tv 1 대 100 2017년 jtbc 여행수다 나를 찾아줘 2018년 kbs 1tv 우리말 겨루기 2021년 유튜브 권민중라디오 2021년 채널a 나는 몸신이다 2021년 jtbc 《친절한 진료실》 2022년 jtbc 《tv정보쇼 알짜왕》. 권민중은 회비를 내려고 가방을 뒤적이는 김광규에게 업어달라고 한다. 권민중, 김광규에 업어달라 요구했다가 지갑 도둑으로 몰린 사연. 그 이후 가방에서 지갑이 없어진 김광규는 권민중을 의심한다. 트위터 1004

토비타신치 권민중은 갑자기 흘러나오는 자신의 노래를 담담하게 듣고 있다가 목청껏 아으허 베드신 권위자 한정수구본승의 야릇한 김장 앙상블 0311. Com › search › 권민중+베드신권민중 베드신 porn videos free xxxrated sex videos 2026 xhams. 0038 무한도전 534회 예고 무한도전. Caprier20230814 0248ip 112. 권민중은 자신의 데뷔작이자 리즈 시절 작품인 투캅스3를 언급한다. 토가 야짤

트위터 ㄹㄹ 디시 김부용은 차 안에서 계속 수다를 떨었던 권민중과 강경헌의 목소리에 괴로웠다며 고통을 호소해 웃음을 자아낸다. 완벽한 연기를 위해서라면 가능하다고 밝혔다. 권민중, 나이 무색 근황투캅스3 시절 모습. Com › people › article파격적인 누드사진으로 화제 모으는 영화배우 권민중｜여성동아. 권민중은 갑자기 흘러나오는 자신의 노래를 담담하게 듣고 있다가 목청껏 아으허 베드신 권위자 한정수구본승의 야릇한 김장 앙상블 0311. 토요코키즈 하울

탈콥 the eye 영화 위선자들 배우 권민중경준최할리, 패널들의 적극적인. Com › site › data영화 투캅스3액션 살렸지만 `눈요기에 집착. 권민중은 갑자기 흘러나오는 자신의 노래를 담담하게 듣고 있다가 목청껏 아으허 베드신 권위자 한정수구본승의 야릇한 김장 앙상블 0311. 이에 대해 권민중은 극중 파트너일 뿐 그 이상도, 이하도 아니다며 극중 상황 때문에 생긴 오해다. 이게 투캅스 시리즈중 유일하게 19세 관람가였고 권민중 올누드 샤워신에 마지막에 김보성이 있는 욕탕에 누드로 들어가는 장면이 나오고 베드신도 있었죠.

톱샐 이게 투캅스 시리즈중 유일하게 19세 관람가였고 권민중 올누드 샤워신에 마지막에 김보성이 있는 욕탕에 누드로 들어가는 장면이 나오고 베드신도 있었죠. 이게 투캅스 시리즈중 유일하게 19세 관람가였고 권민중 올누드 샤워신에 마지막에 김보성이 있는 욕탕에 누드로 들어가는 장면이 나오고 베드신도 있었죠. 1년간 폐인 불타는 청춘 한정수 고백한 故김주혁. 인터뷰 내내 그의 얼굴엔 환한 미소가 가득했다. 이는 과거 성현아 등이 누드화보로 벌어들인 수익을 훨씬 뛰어넘는 액수로 가히 권민중 누드신드롬이 일고 있다고 할 수 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.