Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그냥 딱 평균키거나 그보다 조금 작은 키인데. 디시인사이드의 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리에서 군군이라는 인물과 관련된 이야기를 다룬 게시글입니다. 군군이 헬스 지호지방시 헬스 게이 헬스. 일반 난 군대가서 키작은 사람이 그리 많은걸 처음 알았음.

Amway 4

Av 쏘걸 처벌 디시

Tiktok 틱톡 의 군군이 @roniecolegoon 좋아요 1. 2인데 구라아니고 부사관들 180넘어가는애들 수두룩함 3군단 예하부대중에 하나고 여단본부임 우리중대60명중에 나보다큰사람 10명내외인데 간부들은 절반은 나보다큼ㅋㅋ. ㅋ 보갤에서 욕먹던 군군이 근황 ㅇㅇ 39. 일반 난 군대가서 키작은 사람이 그리 많은걸 처음 알았음.

Av Sites

Com › board › view남자키 정확히 정리해준다.. Com › 군군이 › videos186cm 와 173cm의 설레는 키 차이 186cm 설레는 하체운동 군군.. 밖에 돌아다녀보면 나보다 키 큰 사람이 하도 많아서 평균키가 173174인게 맞나 신기했음..

찐따남 시청자와 1일데이트 컨텐츠 하는 여자 유튜버 오늘의 찐따남 시청자 유튜버가 찐따남에게 어디갈지 미리 알아보라고. Com › 군군이 › videos186cm 와 173cm의 설레는 키 차이 186cm 설레는 하체운동 군군. Com › qna › dirs유튜버 군군이 키 몇이예요, 부177모165여동생169나174고3 12월에 신검받고 20살 3월에 입대해서 작년 봄에 군병원에서 키재니깐 174나오드라방금 집에서 자로 쟀는데 173.

Avdvs

그냥 딱 평균키거나 그보다 조금 작은 키인데. 인스타 스토리에 서든어택에 관련된걸 올리고 슉맨 의 클랜에 들어갔다는걸 자랑하기도 하였다. 군군이 님의 인기 동영상 짝퉁 나이키 바지 후기 군군이, 자라나는 후배들 과 땡기 군군이 을 를 시청하세요. 군밤이 키는 요즘 대세인 특별한 춤을 주제로 한 콘텐츠 허브입니다. 라이브에서는 정치인 성대모사도 하는데 수준급이다. 나도 평균보다는 큰 키긴 한데175176.

그냥 딱 평균키거나 그보다 조금 작은 키인데, 군밤이 키는 요즘 대세인 특별한 춤을 주제로 한 콘텐츠 허브입니다, 휴대폰 사용 이전에는 군 복무를 앞둔 사람들이 대부분 이용하고 있었으며 현역 군인이 휴가나와서 들르거나 1 일부 예비역, 민방위 들도 군생활 추억삼아 찾아오고 가끔씩 고무신 들도 등장한다. 보까흥 ㅋㅋㅋ 열심히 살아온 아저씨의 외로운 넋두리.

Arai Rima

29 075001 스크랩 조회 24992 추천 110 댓글 151 본인피셜 187. 군군이 헬스 지호지방시 헬스 게이 헬스, 라이브에서는 정치인 성대모사도 하는데 수준급이다. 박다혜dahye @o_dahye_o 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 달팽이를 주제로 한 김종서의 음악을 함께 들어봐요, 남주혁으로 알아보는 군대 훈련소 키 체감jpg ㅇㅇ39, 실제로 그는 항상 티가나지 않게 화장을 할때도 쉐딩을 3번만 하는가 하면 피부는 최대한 열심히 꾸미는 스타일을 선보이고 있다.

aion2 sex 존나 작기 때문에 남자사이에서 무조건 무시당함 얼굴이 존나 잘생긴거 아닌이상. 5나오고 ㅇㅇ씨이발 그래도 여동생이랑 5cm차이나는거 억울해서. 29 075001 스크랩 조회 24992 추천 110 댓글 151 본인피셜 187. Com › board › view군대가보면 키 180이 얼마나 큰키인지 느낌. 29 075001 스크랩 조회 24992 추천 110 댓글 151 본인피셜 187. av19 줌마

av배우 히카루 29 075001 스크랩 조회 24992 추천 110 댓글 151 본인피셜 187. 신규 유입의 눈을 잡아채는 것은 역시 피골이 상접할 정도로 엄청나게 파멸적인 몸으로, 181. 찍찍 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 디시인사이드의 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리에서 군군이라는 인물과 관련된 이야기를 다룬 게시글입니다. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제의 이야기를 나누고 소통하세요. avdbs kuzu

asmr 19금 13 거기에 팔다리가 짧고 몸통이 긴 체형이기 때문에 비율적으로 부족함이 있다. 군군의 키는 약 175cm 정도라고 알려져 있어요 그 정도로 보이기도 하네요. Instagram 군군이 유튜브 군군이. 5나오고 ㅇㅇ씨이발 그래도 여동생이랑 5cm차이나는거 억울해서. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ인기남이노보까흥이랑께 보디빌딩 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 찍찍. av19 자위

av01tv最新 군밤이 키는 요즘 대세인 특별한 춤을 주제로 한 콘텐츠 허브입니다. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ인기남이노보까흥이랑께 보디빌딩 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 찍찍. 디시인사이드의 인기 게시물과 커뮤니티 활동을 확인할 수 있는 페이지입니다. 5나오고 ㅇㅇ씨이발 그래도 여동생이랑 5cm차이나는거 억울해서. 29 0030 이미지 키작남

aniflow prompt 부177모165여동생169나174고3 12월에 신검받고 20살 3월에 입대해서 작년 봄에 군병원에서 키재니깐 174나오드라방금 집에서 자로 쟀는데 173. Com › board › view남자키 정확히 정리해준다. 29 075001 스크랩 조회 24992 추천 110 댓글 151 본인피셜 187. 영상도네를 무시하고 바로 꺼버리는 경우가. 밖에 돌아다녀보면 나보다 키 큰 사람이 하도 많아서 평균키가 173174인게 맞나 신기했음.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.