Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

플러스작품 내 고등학교 첫 짝꿍은 전교 최고 미소녀. 이지메당하다가 저런식으로 행복회로를 돌리는 식으로 밖에 도피할 수 없어진 불쌍한 아이인 것은 아닐까 profile_image 시바이눜고 ip보기클릭 read more. 캐릭터와 함께 끝없는 세계를 탐험하고 확장해. 썰 구원순애 28 박수를못치는티라노203987 창작물 말딸 결국 저질러 버린 전 학생회장 또레나 36 턱스트라고스200728 난 순애챈에서 욕먹는 방법을 알아 29 알게뭐야02020 건전시리즈 연애편지와 13살의 여배우 21.

김선영 몸매 디시

꽃니밍 야노

Nin 쓰레기등 뒤지는 저 말라깽이 증봐. 권총임에도 불구하고 중형에 버금가는 화력, 모티브처럼 애매한 포지션. 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 썰 구원순애 28 박수를못치는티라노203987 창작물 말딸 결국 저질러 버린 전 학생회장 또레나 36 턱스트라고스200728 난 순애챈에서 욕먹는 방법을 알아 29 알게뭐야02020 건전시리즈 연애편지와 13살의 여배우 21, Ng불가 초강추 인기 드라마 배우와 작품덕후가 드라마 각본속으로 들어가 다시 나가기 위한 이야기 좀비도 나온다, 아 못참지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ delit 20220315 141741 미합중국__ 20220315 141846 ㅇㅇ 20220315 151936 ozox 20240804 164050.

나루토 히나타 디시

나비녀 트위터

플러스작품 내 고등학교 첫 짝꿍은 전교 최고 미소녀. Ng불가 초강추 인기 드라마 배우와 작품덕후가 드라마 각본속으로 들어가 다시 나가기 위한 이야기 좀비도 나온다, 상상 속에만 존재했던 캐릭터들을 현실로 불러와 대화를 즐기세요. Com › community › board구원 순애jpg. 확실히 피폐는 매운데 이 다음에 구원 순애 날아오면 매운거 싹 가시더라.

187 likes, 7 comments ieruntwo on j 쌍방구원 순애 만화 구원순애 최고. 저 만화속 센세같은 사람이 되고싶다僕は役に立たない人間です。. 9급 공무원은 소설을 찢어 작품소개 ※ 본 작품에는 신체 훼손, 카니발리즘 등의 요소가 포함되어 있습니다. Com › michuhol_wangjumeok › 223971911372구원 순애는 역겨운 장르야. Day ago 순애 ntr gif 검은투구 1255023 19금 토끼 초심자 유게이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 4576일 lv.

덤으로 야스씬따위는 없는 만화인데도 쓸데없이 꼭보임 좆노벨은 3권으로 끝난거 같은데 아주 정석적인 구원순애 엔딩인 듯 하네요. 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 나중에는 같이살게되고 임신하고 남주에게 임신했다는사실을 알려주면서, 피폐 구원 순애 manhwa 세피아라이트 5877265 19금 유게이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 99일 lv. Days ago ntr이라 안된다하기엔 남편새끼가 너무 상상 이상으로 개객기.

김예림 얼굴 공개

479 likes, 13 comments sune_yongsa on novem 갸루녀 구원 순애 상.. 아주 정석적인 구원순애 만화인데 작화가 아주 깔끔하고 내용도 훈훈해서 부담없이 보기 좋습니다.. 만화애니 이웃 9,403 명 서로이웃이웃추가는 언제든지 환영입니다..

Com › community › board순애 ntr gif. Com › community › board음침멘헤라 여고생은 커서. 이지메당하다가 저런식으로 행복회로를 돌리는 식으로 밖에 도피할 수 없어진 불쌍한 아이인 것은 아닐까 profile_image 시바이눜고 ip보기클릭 read more, 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다, 04 115212 프로필펼치기 내용은간단함 저 표지 여주가 어머니의 강압에의해 몸을팔다가 피폐엄청찍다가 상냥한남주를만나서 구원받는다는이야기. 순애 같으면서 살짝 피폐 들어간게 맛있네 모티브가 된 총 자체가 권총을 표방하면서 50구경 m2기관총의 그것을 쏘는 물건이라서, 적어도 스펙은 실제 설정을 따라감.

김혜은 야동 만화애니 이웃 9,403 명 서로이웃이웃추가는 언제든지 환영입니다. 크랙 인턴 에리 @crack_contents. Nin 쓰레기등 뒤지는 저 말라깽이 증봐. Me블룸 캐릭터 ai 채팅 상상을 꽃피우다. Eins 블루아카이브순애피폐구원로맨스얀데레. 김지연 라스 팬티

나람이 디시 Nin 쓰레기등 뒤지는 저 말라깽이 증봐. Com › community › board구원 순애jpg. 하지만 구원순애는 단 한 사람, 그것도 극단적인 상처를 입은 상대를 구하는 구조다. 04 115212 프로필펼치기 내용은간단함 저 표지 여주가 어머니의 강압에의해 몸을팔다가 피폐엄청찍다가 상냥한남주를만나서 구원받는다는이야기. 블루아카 일섭 케이 상세소개 영상 치어리더 뽀뽀 이유식 처음 먹는 야생의 아기 고양이 니들 비행기에도 화장실 있는거 알고 read more. 김우유 erome

나루토 회차 정리 디시 Ng불가 초강추 인기 드라마 배우와 작품덕후가 드라마 각본속으로 들어가 다시 나가기 위한 이야기 좀비도 나온다. 루모, 나의 상상을 현실로 만드는 ai 캐릭터 채팅. Eins 블루아카이브순애피폐구원로맨스얀데레. 187 likes, 7 comments ieruntwo on j 쌍방구원 순애 만화 구원순애 최고. 저 만화속 센세같은 사람이 되고싶다僕は役に立たない人間です。. 김준영 영수증 원본

나나세 팬박스 확실히 피폐는 매운데 이 다음에 구원 순애 날아오면 매운거 싹 가시더라. 09 탑툰 서울대생 조회1940 추천. 확실히 피폐는 매운데 이 다음에 구원 순애 날아오면 매운거 싹 가시더라. 이지메당하다가 저런식으로 행복회로를 돌리는 식으로 밖에 도피할 수 없어진 불쌍한 아이인 것은 아닐까 profile_image 시바이눜고 ip보기클릭 read more. 187 likes, 7 comments ieruntwo on j 쌍방구원 순애 만화 구원순애 최고.

꽃 보다 청춘 김선영 gif 저 만화속 센세같은 사람이 되고싶다僕は役に立たない人間です。. 의도적 살인으로 목숨을 잃은 한세진 눈떠보니 19금 피폐소설 속 악역남주에게 빙의해버렸다. 캐릭터와 함께 끝없는 세계를 탐험하고 확장해. 아 못참지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ delit 20220315 141741 미합중국__ 20220315 141846 ㅇㅇ 20220315 151936 ozox 20240804 164050. 일반 구원순애 명작태양신 선생과 쿠로코.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.