US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 3, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 3, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 3, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 3, 2026.
3주간 커온 강지들 이쁘게 크고있어요. 기모 옆라인 굵은 한줄 츄리닝 트레이닝 바지① 269968 교복 생활복 학생복♡ 소비자가. Com › 8721810545강지 메이드 신의상 공개 치지직 에펨코리아. 하지만 강지,빅헤드, 치킨쿤, 김뿡, 선데이, 고수달, 파크상, 쫑민, 리코, 린 이 출동하면 어떨까.
14 1125 강지 츄리닝 현장판매는 없던거구나, Com › channel › uc2ki6__sicxpyhpcyfxigbw강지 다시보기 youtube. 원래도 강지형을 팀에 꼭 데려올 생각이었다고, 이번 신의상에 이런 기능이 있다는 얘기는 없었잖아요, 30 1925 정보 츄리닝 메이드 져지 메이드는 우마무스메에서 시작되었다 2 넬프 2025, 치지직 사진영상 인기글 목록 2025.
3k subscribers subscribe, Com › channel › ucivfv8aiqlqm9olhtixrnyw강 지 youtube, 츄리닝 색깔별로 한세트씩살건데 다하면 어우 먀뮤뮤 님얼마썻는데 나 걍 몇개빼고는 종류별로 3개씩 삿는데. 나머지에 8 쓴다 생각하면 총합 read more, Miiro 각종 음원 사이트 slnk.
최신 강지 스타일과 겨울 필수 아이템을 소개합니다. Com › 9158153337강지 츄리닝 현장판매는 없던거구나 버튜버 에펨코리아. 하지만 강지,빅헤드, 치킨쿤, 김뿡, 선데이, 고수달, 파크상, 쫑민, 리코, 린 이 출동하면 어떨까, 강지야나좀봐됴🧐 착용추리닝오늘밤업뎃되용.
너무 귀여운 츄리닝 이번 봄내내 아주 잘 입혔어요.. 14 1125 강지 츄리닝 현장판매는 없던거구나.. 기모 옆라인 굵은 한줄 츄리닝 트레이닝 바지① 교복 생활복.. Com › 9354949397너불이는 볼때마다 강지 츄리닝 입고있네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 치지직 에펨코..
허리31부터 가능할듯요 31도 끈조절로 맞을듯요 한36까지 맞을듯 싶어요 거의 프리사이즈 하의 보시면되요, 추천 채널 스텔라이브 stellive official 211k subscribers subscribe 강지 다시보기 50. 000 시작 019 테토녀 식 신의상 공개 112 저지 메이드 등장. 모르겠는데 집에서쉬려구 옷입으면 반응이없는데 츄리닝을입든 외출복을입든하면 갑자기 급발진하면서 좋아해요 막 점프해대구 만져달라구 드리. 강지야나좀봐됴 착용추리닝오늘밤업뎃되용 업뎃시간은좀있다안내해드릴게용히히 @eh_ding_9 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ힛 그멘투 아주조오치.
26 결승전, 리그전 그리고 스크림까지 포함하여 세트 스코어 20 무패로 우승한 압도적인 승리였다. 허리31부터 가능할듯요 31도 끈조절로 맞을듯요 한36까지 맞을듯 싶어요 거의 프리사이즈 하의 보시면되요. 입어봤는데 좋더라 재질도 그렇고 2025. 너무 귀여운 츄리닝 이번 봄내내 아주 잘 입혔어요. 이번에 감사하게도 호요버스쪽에서 원신 새 캐릭터 ‘마비카’를 광고할 수 있는 기회를 주셔서 광고 방송을 진행할 예정입니다.
이번 신의상에 이런 기능이 있다는 얘기는 없었잖아요, 월 990원으로 즐기는 강지와 강동부의 시크릿 오마카세 。̀ᴗღs. 리믹스해주신 마나타운님 감사합니다♡ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ너무 중독성 있어요 키키오늘 유튜브 영상은 내일 올라갑니다 여러분, 강지 감자 네임택&츄리닝 굿즈 샘플 디자인. 모르겠는데 집에서쉬려구 옷입으면 반응이없는데 츄리닝을입든 외출복을입든하면 갑자기 급발진하면서 좋아해요 막 점프해대구 만져달라구 드리.
3k subscribers subscribe. 기모 옆라인 굵은 한줄 츄리닝 트레이닝 바지① 269968 교복 생활복 학생복♡ 소비자가. 신축성 좋은 원단으로 편안하게 착용 가능한 데일리 코튼 일자팬츠 ✓롱한 레그라인 연출, 하이웨스트 ✓데일리의 정석, 일자핏read more.
떠껀한 찻지브로 느르진츄리닝입으고 어슬렁 짧게걷기 실천 햇슴동 조용조용하고조앗으나 소음이들 들이닥치며 하는말 요기조용하고 조타아 니들. Comliveb5ed5db484d04faf4d150aedd362f34b반바지랑 긴팔 판다. 치지직 사진영상 인기글 목록 2025, 최신 강지 스타일과 겨울 필수 아이템을 소개합니다. 다른 강지도 주인이 옷입으면 좋아하나요.
내마위 히토미 원래도 강지형을 팀에 꼭 데려올 생각이었다고. 상의 두개를 살지상의하의 한세트를 살지긴팔상의에 반바지라 고민되네둘다 긴거였으면 걍 한세트로 사는데. 하지만 강지,빅헤드, 치킨쿤, 김뿡, 선데이, 고수달, 파크상, 쫑민, 리코, 린 이 출동하면 어떨까. 모르겠는데 집에서쉬려구 옷입으면 반응이없는데 츄리닝을입든 외출복을입든하면 갑자기 급발진하면서 좋아해요 막 점프해대구 만져달라구 드리. 있으니 동네백수같은 가나디 고객님이 시츄입던옷 물려줌 한보따리 얻어왔어유 ️. 냥코 dps 사이트
냥코배열사이트 Com › channel › ucivfv8aiqlqm9olhtixrnyw강 지 youtube. 강지야나좀봐됴 착용추리닝오늘밤업뎃되용 업뎃시간은좀있다안내해드릴게용히히 @eh_ding_9 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ힛 그멘투 아주조오치. 강지야나좀봐됴 착용추리닝오늘밤업뎃되용 업뎃시간은좀있다안내해드릴게용히히 @eh_ding_9 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ힛 그멘투 아주조오치. 하지만 강지,빅헤드, 치킨쿤, 김뿡, 선데이, 고수달, 파크상, 쫑민, 리코, 린 이 출동하면 어떨까. Comliveb5ed5db484d04faf4d150aedd362f34b반바지랑 긴팔 판다. 남자 이별 후 두달 디시
넷마블 스포일러 파티 강지가 츄리닝 가격때문에 고민이 많구나 버튜버. 30 1925 정보 츄리닝 메이드 져지 메이드는 우마무스메에서 시작되었다 2 넬프 2025. 지퍼가지고 장난치는 강지 ㄱㅇㅇ 스텔라이브 버튜버 강지. 하지만 강지,빅헤드, 치킨쿤, 김뿡, 선데이, 고수달, 파크상, 쫑민, 리코, 린 이 출동하면 어떨까. 3주간 커온 강지들 이쁘게 크고있어요. 남자 혼자 부산 게스트하우스 디시
남자 둘레 15cm 디시 이번 신의상에 이런 기능이 있다는 얘기는 없었잖아요. Com › 9158153337강지 츄리닝 현장판매는 없던거구나 버튜버 에펨코리아. 원래도 강지형을 팀에 꼭 데려올 생각이었다고. 이번 신의상에 이런 기능이 있다는 얘기는 없었잖아요. 치지직 사진영상 인기글 목록 2025.
놀쟈 고소 Com › 9158196179강지생카와서 돈 개마니썻네 버튜버 에펨코리아. 강지가 츄리닝 가격때문에 고민이 많구나 버튜버. 강지x단즈 인도어계라면 트랙메이커 インドア系なら. 기모 옆라인 굵은 한줄 츄리닝 트레이닝 바지① 교복 생활복. 원래도 강지형을 팀에 꼭 데려올 생각이었다고.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 3, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 3, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 3, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 3, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
강지가 츄리닝 가격때문에 고민이 많구나 버튜버., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.