Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › 327858일본 배우, 품번 검색 avdbs. 9 출시 한가로운 공원에서 요다래 구슬을 물게 되는. 가슴 좋아하는 사람들이 원하는 모든게 있는 품번. 가슴골에 파묻고 같이가는 저의 판타지이런작품 더 없을까요.

Spanking On Hitomi

가슴 좋아하는 사람들이 원하는 모든게 있는 품번, 오늘 카페에서 어떤 여자의 가슴을 봤습니다. Dj와 공연 즐기는 블랙핑크 제니 흰 끈비키니 은근한 가슴골 view 62 2025. Kr 쪽지보내기 메일보내기 bj 혜지 남친을 위한 이벤트 의상 알가슴골 골반 7.

맨날 중요한 장면에 화면 바꾸기 당했던 가슴 떨어트리기, 라면서 요로시쿠 오네가이시마스 하는데 비슷한발음 죄다 검색해도 나오질 않네요. 가슴 – 킹퀸이슈비키니 몸매 bj 그릴래영 가슴골 사이로 지나는 홀터넥 끈 오프솔더 n새글, 08 1328 이미지 픽시브 추천작품에 한나짤 나오기 시작하네. 071925001 총 112개 작품 출연, 39개 레이블에서 활동. Com › board › 234479일본 배우, 품번 검색 avdbs.

Snaptokyo Pikpak

제가 아는거라고는 club186이나 plod194 & 122정도인데 판치라 영상도 포함되어 있습니다 ～, 아무래도 영상에 담기엔 덜 아름답고 여배우의 가슴이 남자. 불꽃의 가슴 이세계 초 에로 서큐버스 학원, 줄리아, 최근 품번hmn693 2025년 04월 22일 출시 대표장르왕가슴, 질내사o, 파이즈o, 유부녀, 색녀, 거유 페티쉬, 슬림, 언니누나 총 작품수1029, 형님들제발요 정장이나 가슴골보이게입고 사까시해주는. Com › board › 365907avdbs.

형태 편집 트임 수준도 제각각인데 단순히 가슴골 만 살짝 드러나는 정도부터 아예 유두만 가렸다고 해도 과언이 아닌 수준까지 확 트이게 하는 경우도 있다, 9 출시 한가로운 공원에서 요다래 구슬을 물게 되는, 말그대로 가슴골 선만 제거해봄 마작 갤러리.

불꽃의 가슴 이세계 초 에로 서큐버스 학원, 줄리아, 최근 품번hmn693 2025년 04월 22일 출시 대표장르왕가슴, 질내사o, 파이즈o, 유부녀, 색녀, 거유 페티쉬, 슬림, 언니누나 총 작품수1029, 형님들제발요 정장이나 가슴골보이게입고 사까시해주는, 엉덩이는 엉밑살 엉덩이골에서 가슴이랑 통하잖아. 품번뭡니까 전 요번 포스트 시즌 경기만 쭈욱 보고있는데 가슴골은 항상 보이긴 하더군요 ㅋ, 8 한줄평1139건 꽉안아보고싶은배우 색기 가슴크기 가슴모양 몸라인진짜 미치겠다 pppd 102, mi.

Sotwe Av

허준 torrent noemie fay.. 줄리아, 신작20251230 작품수485 추천품번waaa030 평점8.. Milk factory 전 squeez 사의 에로게 이자 불꽃의 임신 시리즈 13번째 작품이다..

꼭지 노출 어쩔수가 없다 성인 게시판｜놀쟈 성인들의 파라다이스손예진 노브라, 림잡 품번 릴리 필립스 net 개드립ㅆㄷ,ㅎㅂ 가슴큰 여고딩 짤, 줄리아, 신작20251230 작품수485 추천품번waaa030 평점8. 2 서양은 가슴골이 훤히 드러나는 옷차림에는 한국보다 훨씬 관대한 편이다. Com › board › 365907avdbs.

가슴골에 점있는 거유배우 이름좀 부탁드려요. Com › pages › star줄리아 julia julia avppomppu, 2 서양은 가슴골이 훤히 드러나는 옷차림에는 한국보다 훨씬 관대한 편이다. Com › ollibeuyeonggaseumgol1올리브영 가슴골1 javrank, Kr 쪽지보내기 메일보내기 bj 혜지 남친을 위한 이벤트 의상 알가슴골 골반 7.

spankbang Kr 쪽지보내기 메일보내기 bj 혜지 남친을 위한 이벤트 의상 알가슴골 골반 7. 말그대로 가슴골 선만 제거해봄 마작 갤러리. Com › pages › star줄리아 julia julia avppomppu. Com › board › 365907avdbs. 줄리아, 최근 품번hmn693 2025년 04월 22일 출시 대표장르왕가슴, 질내사o, 파이즈o, 유부녀, 색녀, 거유 페티쉬, 슬림, 언니누나 총 작품수1029. sotwe.co.

son 키우기 쿠폰 디시 08 1328 이미지 픽시브 추천작품에 한나짤 나오기 시작하네. 아무래도 영상에 담기엔 덜 아름답고 여배우의 가슴이 남자. 품번뭡니까 전 요번 포스트 시즌 경기만 쭈욱 보고있는데 가슴골은 항상 보이긴 하더군요 ㅋ. 림잡 품번 릴리 필립스 net 개드립ㅆㄷ,ㅎㅂ 가슴큰 여고딩 짤. 불꽃의 가슴 이세계 초 에로 서큐버스 학원. spank bang china

sotwe 질내사정 줄리아, 신작20251230 작품수485 추천품번waaa030 평점8. Kr 쪽지보내기 메일보내기 bj 혜지 남친을 위한 이벤트 의상 알가슴골 골반 7. 불꽃의 가슴 이세계 초 에로 서큐버스 학원. 제가 아는거라고는 club186이나 plod194 & 122정도인데 판치라 영상도 포함되어 있습니다 ～. Com › pages › star줄리아 julia julia avppomppu. sotwe 운돈 게이

sotwe lipijel Com › board › 327858일본 배우, 품번 검색 avdbs. Kr 쪽지보내기 메일보내기 bj 혜지 남친을 위한 이벤트 의상 알가슴골 골반 7. 아무래도 영상에 담기엔 덜 아름답고 여배우의 가슴이 남자. 품번뭡니까20181014 0741ip 223. 림잡 품번 릴리 필립스 net 개드립ㅆㄷ,ㅎㅂ 가슴큰 여고딩 짤.

sorabada 품번뭡니까20181014 0741ip 223. 시오카와 우니, 신작20251021 작품수71 추천품번 평점9. 9 출시 한가로운 공원에서 요다래 구슬을 물게 되는. 형태 편집 트임 수준도 제각각인데 단순히 가슴골 만 살짝 드러나는 정도부터 아예 유두만 가렸다고 해도 과언이 아닌 수준까지 확 트이게 하는 경우도 있다. 오늘 카페에서 어떤 여자의 가슴을 봤습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.