Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › view가브리엘 통찰력 믿을만 하네 실시간 베스트 갤러리. Clubs and organizations. 혼자오셔도 매칭이 가능하며 즐거운 시간을 보내실수있게 노력하고있습니다. 진짜 가브리엘 근황jpg 치지직 마이너 갤러리.

Twitterdouga

Twitter Nuru

2023년 11월 6일, 콜롬비아 와 아르헨티나 와의 월드컵 예선 경기를 앞두고 처음으로 국가대표 소집 명단에 들었다, 내가 트위치에서 방송할 때 평균적으로 2000명 내외가 봤어. One of the largest clubs at fgr, a central activity of the club is witness at the march for life in washington, d.

내부에는 가브리엘 대대 테이블이 총 7대 준비되어 있었고요.. 하지만 완전히 다른 플랫폼이이고 다른 커뮤니티야.. 가브리엘 통찰력 믿을만 하네 실시간 베스트 갤러리..

가브릴 드롭아웃gabriel dropout 에 관한 이야기를 나누는 곳입니다 가브릴 드롭아웃 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Streamer gabriel의 minor gallery 다 bro 가브리엘스트리머 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 포지션 경쟁자인 안토니 와 히샤를리송 의 심각한 부진, 그리고 대선배 네이마르 주니오르 의 부상으로. 08 180634 조회 43243 추천 686 댓글 313 레딧에서 한국 동아시아 미개하고 후진적이야, 저래도 클럽가면 한녀들 프리패스라는 거임 뭐 본인도 그것 때문에 한녀들 질색하더라 ㅋㅋ.

Tw-dl.net

추가로 한국 떠나기 전 가브리엘 왈 한국 여성의 약 35%가 금전적 보상을 대가로 성관계를 한다. Neves went on to deliver an even, Neves went on to deliver an even. Dc and the fun you had running in the world war ii memorial water your first dorney park visit and all the fun we had at all those rides your first read more.

인천 계산동에 위치한 cm 당구클럽을 소개합니다. 구리,남양주 초보,중수,고수 모두 환영합니다. 당구를 사랑하고 열정 가득한분들 모십니다 저희클럽은 가브리엘라팔대대 신형8대를 보유하고 있으며, 시설또한 좋습니다 최고의 당구환경을 구축하도록 노력하며 최선을 다하는 동호회가 되겠습니다 주소 평택시 추담로5811 2층 가브리엘클럽. 맘좋은 사자님과 깔끔한 인테리어로 꾸며진 구장입니다. 가브릴 드롭아웃gabriel dropout 에 관한 이야기를 나누는 곳입니다 가브릴 드롭아웃 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

Ufo디시

Time to triple up on man utd in fantasy.. 그리하여 가브리엘 아노는 uefa에게 성공적이었던 친선전의 결과를 어필하였다..

Neves went on to deliver an even. 가짜사나이 유튜브 출연으로 유명한 크로아티아 출신 러시아 군인 가브리엘gabriel hrastović이 동부 돈바스 지역에서 총격으로 인해 사망했다고 우크라이나 당국이 밝혔다, List of owners of english football clubs.

가브리엘 근황real 치지직 마이너 갤러리. 안녕하세요 구리시 인창동에 위치한 가브리엘당구클럽입니다. 인천 송도 당구장 가브리엘 대대클럽 정액제로 꿀빨아요. 맘좋은 사자님과 깔끔한 인테리어로 꾸며진 구장입니다, 일본이 외국인 출입금지 가게들로 유명하며 호주 같은 서양권 나라들에서도 일부 클럽 등에서 동양인의 출입을 막는 곳들이 있다.

Vkclszh

Com › board › view가브리엘 근황jpg 스트리머 갤러리. 라팔 캐롬 당구 클럽은 약 100명의 크기의 공간에 라팔 8대가 설치되어 있으며 큐스코 스코어 보드와 함께 운영되고 있는 국제식 대대 전용클럽입니다. Ai product lead at natwest, 석촌역 가브리엘 당구클럽 사장님과는 올해 초에 처.

twivideo 殿堂入り Brooklyn fc signs lukas burns, shaan hundal. 보통은 20포인트에 맞아야 구석으로 들어온다. 안녕하세요 구리시 인창동에 위치한 가브리엘당구클럽입니다. 안양 호계동에 있는 가브리엘 빌리어드 클럽입니다. Maguire carrick has galvanised the the portuguese has bettered mbeumo by 10 points to zero for defensive contributions dc. ugay69

twitterペギング National league northsouth. 진짜 가브리엘 근황jpg 치지직 마이너 갤러리. 포지션 경쟁자인 안토니 와 히샤를리송 의 심각한 부진, 그리고 대선배 네이마르 주니오르 의 부상으로. 특히 가브리엘 테이블만 모아놓은 곳은 흔치 않은데, 공 타구감도 정말 좋고, 전체적으로 테이블 상태도 매우 훌륭했습니다. Maguire carrick has galvanised the the portuguese has bettered mbeumo by 10 points to zero for defensive contributions dc. twitter nude

vcs ツイッター Investments keh sports limited. Brooklyn fc signs goalkeeper lukas burns, forward shaan hundal and defender gabriel alves as the mens team builds its inaugural usl. 08 180634 조회 43243 추천 686 댓글 313 레딧에서 한국 동아시아 미개하고 후진적이야. 남양주 다산에 당구를 취미로 하시는 많은분들이 계십니다. 안녕하세요 구리시 인창동에 위치한 가브리엘당구클럽입니다. undergraund idol

umemaro3d wiki 클럽에 놀러, 가브리엘 토시 근황 우주전쟁 마이너 갤러리. 마지막에 차 안에서 찍다 보니 흐릿하게 나와버렸네요ㅠㅠ. 석촌역 가브리엘 당구클럽 사장님과는 올해 초에 처. 안양 캐롬 당구 클럽은 국제식 대대 라팔 8대로 이뤄진 국제식 대대 전용 클럽입니다. 구리,남양주 초보,중수,고수 모두 환영합니다.

twidouga.nwt 다산신도시,남양주 구리에서 최고시설을 지켜. 포지션 경쟁자인 안토니 와 히샤를리송 의 심각한 부진, 그리고 대선배 네이마르 주니오르 의 부상으로. Streamer gabriel의 minor gallery 다 bro 가브리엘스트리머 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. List of owners of english football clubs. Clubs and organizations.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.