Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

はじめまして。 須田真衣です。 37歳で2児の母。 化粧品会社でprとして働きながら、フリーのモデル、美容インフルエンサーとして活動しています。 7歳と4歳の子供を抱え毎日育児に奮闘中です。 ママになって感じたことは、本当に自分の時間が取れない！. Join facebook to connect with 須田真衣 and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open. 2024年1月20日スタート！毎週土曜よる1130～放送！テレビ朝日 土曜ナイトドラマ『離婚しない男―サレ夫と悪嫁の騙し愛―』番組サイト。日本エンタメ界のトップランナー鈴木おさむ引退前最後の地上波連ドラはサレ夫の逆襲劇.

Tel Hitomi

T1 제우스 여자친구 디시

Suda on instagram ママでも綺麗を諦めたくない 須田真衣のちょこっとマイテク ノーファンデ美容研究家 📩お仕事のご依頼はメールへお願いします📩 スリーププランナー美的リーダーズ💄 元ipsa, 須田真衣ちゃんが好きでした。 今も好き。ほんわかした可愛らしさに癒やされます。 なんで離婚しちゃったのかしら？ 結婚して離婚して復縁してまた離婚してとか色々ある. 13k followers, 22 following, 197 posts 離婚後夜公式 @dramal2_abctv on instagram 「僕を選んでください」 大企業御曹司が初めて本気の恋を知った―― 離婚後夜から始まる、超絶ピュア🤍ラブストーリーを待望の実写化！ 佐野晶哉 久保田紗友 長谷川慎 離婚後夜 abcテレビ（関西）毎週日曜深夜0, 13k subscribers33 videos. 婚姻費用新算定表だけでは適切に計算できない高額学費・住居費負担などに対応。婚姻費用の相場を素早く確認したい方のための、自動計算できるシミュレーターです。離婚相談はお任せください。.

化粧品会社prに、モデル、美容インフルエンサーとして活動しながら、子育てに奮闘する須田さん。 「自分に使える時間が全然ないからといって、美容をサボると確実に老けてしまう。. この度、離婚いたしました。 一般人のわたしが、 わざわざこんな報告をinstagramで するべきなのかを迷いましたが、 フォローしてくださっている皆様には いつも私が沢山励まされているので ありのままの私を知っていて欲しいな, 13k subscribers33 videos. 読者モデルを語りたい ガールズちゃんねる girls channel.

Start-166 女優

［40代 小学生2児のママスキンケアとメイク｜化粧水レビュー, 79k followers, 1,469 following, 1,208 posts 須田真衣 @mai, ［40代 小学生2児のママスキンケアとメイク｜化粧水レビュー. オリジナル楽曲 離婚伝説 萩谷麻衣子 離婚 神楽坂恵 離婚 まさやん 離婚 滝口樹里 離婚 福乃神ヒロ 離婚 須田真衣 離婚 八坂沙織 離婚 引地敬澄 離婚. Suda on instagram ママでも綺麗を諦めたくない 須田真衣のちょこっとマイテク ノーファンデ美容研究家 📩お仕事のご依頼はメールへお願いします📩 スリーププランナー美的リーダーズ💄 元ipsa.

『離婚しない男サレ夫と悪嫁の騙し愛』（ サレおとおよめのだましあい）のタイトルで、2024年1月20日から3月16日まで テレビ朝日系 「土曜ナイトドラマ」枠にて放送された 5。主演は 伊藤淳史 5。 なお、本作は 鈴木おさむ が地上波の連続ドラマで脚本を手掛ける最後の作品である 5。.. Com › akimotoyuri秋元優里と生田竜聖の離婚＆現在！タバコ＆浮気などの問題まとめ.. 2024年1月20日スタート！毎週土曜よる1130～放送！テレビ朝日 土曜ナイトドラマ『離婚しない男―サレ夫と悪嫁の騙し愛―』番組サイト。日本エンタメ界のトップランナー鈴木おさむ引退前最後の地上波連ドラはサレ夫の逆襲劇..

Thumbzilla.vom

News › articles › 20200704oht1t50264坂井真紀、6月末に離婚成立&mldr. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes. Com › public › 須田真衣須田真衣 profiles, Facebook gives people the power to share and makes.

Com › public › 須田真衣須田真衣 profiles. 離婚伝説 （りこんでんせつ）は、 日本 の男性2人組 バンド 1。 2024年より ソニー・ミュージックレーベルズ の アリオラジャパン レーベルからメジャーデビューした 2。. Sudaのtiktok aaa 宇野実彩子 離婚 鈴木愛理 かわいい 鈴木愛理 菊池 風磨鈴木愛理, Com › @sudamai須田真衣チャンネル youtube. Sudaのtiktok aaa 宇野実彩子 離婚 鈴木愛理 かわいい 鈴木愛理 菊池 風磨鈴木愛理. 読者モデルを語りたい ガールズちゃんねる girls channel.

Sxxhxx21

0182無名モデル 20110222火 195431. 「離婚したい、けどできない」そんな風に悩む女性は、珍しくありません。 具体的に、離婚を踏みとどまっている代表的な理由は、「経済的な問題」「精神的な問題」「住まいの問題」「子供や親の問題」「将来の問題」の5つです。. Jp › uenoyuichiro上野裕一郎の妻・真衣の顔画像が美人！子供や不倫で離婚しない理由も, オリジナル楽曲 離婚伝説 萩谷麻衣子 離婚 神楽坂恵 離婚 まさやん 離婚 滝口樹里 離婚 福乃神ヒロ 離婚 須田真衣 離婚 八坂沙織 離婚 引地敬澄 離婚. はじめまして。 須田真衣です。 37歳で2児の母。 化粧品会社でprとして働きながら、フリーのモデル、美容インフルエンサーとして活動しています。 7歳と4歳の子供を抱え毎日育児に奮闘中です。 ママになって感じたことは、本当に自分の時間が取れない！. 須田真衣と旦那の素敵な関係について詳しく紹介します。結婚や出会いのエピソードをお楽しみください！岩田絵里奈 旦那, 渡邉真衣 旦那.

tae_ha_xx likey ココリコの田中直樹（47）が、昨年離婚した元妻の女優小日向しえ（38）と、現在の家族の状況を明かした。 田中はお笑い芸人の藤井隆とともに26. 監督解任を経て現在は陸上選手として復活し注目されています。 今回は 上野裕一郎の妻・真衣の顔画像が美人！ 子供や不倫で離婚しない理由も調査！ という事で、上野裕一郎さんの結婚や相手の奥さん、子供について情報をまとめました。. 2022年ih フェンシング 女子個人エペ 予選トーナメント2回戦 須田真衣 星槎国際川口 埼玉 vs 中西莉心 金沢西 石川 インハイtv 51. 佐伯絵里〈29〉（弁護士、元 検事） 演 瀬戸朝香 2 パシフィック合同法律事務所に所属する ヤメ検 弁護士。柳田の大学の後輩。とても冷静でかなり優秀な弁護士。案件において相談者が有利であれば法律を用いての強攻策が目立つ。逆に不利な状況になると相談者に妥協案を持ちかけ、説得. Com › entertainment › newsココリコ田中、小日向しえと離婚後の関係明かす. thelittlejuicer pikpak

su페리 자위 離婚伝説 （りこんでんせつ）は、 日本 の男性2人組 バンド 1。 2024年より ソニー・ミュージックレーベルズ の アリオラジャパン レーベルからメジャーデビューした 2。. Org › wiki › 離婚しない男離婚しない男 wikipedia. 秋元 真夏（あきもと まなつ、1993年〈平成5年〉8月20日 ）は、日本の女優、タレントであり、女性アイドルグループ乃木坂46の元メンバーおよび2代目キャプテンである。read more. 2022年ih フェンシング 女子個人エペ 予選トーナメント2回戦 須田真衣 星槎国際川口 埼玉 vs 中西莉心 金沢西 石川 インハイtv 51. Jp › 883003坂井真紀、夫と離婚していた 同情が集まるも、一部では「因果応報」の. t.me translation

stella sedona hotwife 女優の坂井真紀（50）が、元写真家で「クリエイティブ・ストラテジスト」として活動する鈴木心氏（39）と離婚したことが4日、スポーツ報知の取材で分かった。 複数の関係者によると、6月末に離婚が成立した。 2人は09年10月に結婚。. 監督解任を経て現在は陸上選手として復活し注目されています。 今回は 上野裕一郎の妻・真衣の顔画像が美人！ 子供や不倫で離婚しない理由も調査！ という事で、上野裕一郎さんの結婚や相手の奥さん、子供について情報をまとめました。. しかし、2016年11月に別居・離婚報道があり、2018年4月に離婚が成立しました。 この記事では、秋元優里さんと生田竜聖さんの結婚と別居や不倫・離婚報道、また秋元さんの問題行動 タバコ・震災での不適切発言？ 等をまとめています。. Org › wiki › 離婚しない男離婚しない男 wikipedia. ［40代 小学生2児のママスキンケアとメイク｜化粧水レビュー. subscribestar deepstroke

taeha likey 婚姻費用新算定表だけでは適切に計算できない高額学費・住居費負担などに対応。婚姻費用の相場を素早く確認したい方のための、自動計算できるシミュレーターです。離婚相談はお任せください。. 13k followers, 22 following, 197 posts 離婚後夜公式 @dramal2_abctv on instagram 「僕を選んでください」 大企業御曹司が初めて本気の恋を知った―― 離婚後夜から始まる、超絶ピュア🤍ラブストーリーを待望の実写化！ 佐野晶哉 久保田紗友 長谷川慎 離婚後夜 abcテレビ（関西）毎週日曜深夜0. 須田真衣ちゃんが好きでした。 今も好き。ほんわかした可愛らしさに癒やされます。 なんで離婚しちゃったのかしら？ 結婚して離婚して復縁してまた離婚してとか色々ある. Com › akimotoyuri秋元優里と生田竜聖の離婚＆現在！タバコ＆浮気などの問題まとめ. View the profiles of people named 須田真衣.

tmvozldqod はじめまして。 須田真衣です。 37歳で2児の母。 化粧品会社でprとして働きながら、フリーのモデル、美容インフルエンサーとして活動しています。 7歳と4歳の子供を抱え毎日育児に奮闘中です。 ママになって感じたことは、本当に自分の時間が取れない！. 一方、片岡幹人（オジンオズボーン篠宮暁）と再会し、昔の気持ちを思いした松嶋ツカサ（大谷麻衣）は、陽平（伊島空）と離婚して2年前から生きなおすと決心する。 急いで離婚を進めようとするツカサに、飛鳥と達也は違和感を抱く。. 2k followers 363 threads ママでもキレイを諦めたくない ☆38歳ノーファンデ イエベ春 ☆8y 5y ☆美的リーダーズ☆13年間大手化粧品会社勤務☆. 須田真衣ですママでもキレイを諦めたくないmom of 8y👧6y👦38歳ノーファンデ イエベ春 13年間デパコススキンケアブランド勤務スキン. 須田真衣ちゃんが好きでした。 今も好き。ほんわかした可愛らしさに癒やされます。 なんで離婚しちゃったのかしら？ 結婚して離婚して復縁してまた離婚してとか色々ある.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.