Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

這部劇在第2集就有讓人臉紅心跳的裸露畫面，是池昌旭與一群裸身宮女的愛撫畫面。 此外，鄭柔美也是這部劇裡挑戰大尺度最多的人，不只與池昌旭有床戲，還有女女的激情戲！ if playback doesnt begin shortly, try restarting your device. 《李尸朝鲜》 这部古装丧尸力作，算是网飞韩剧的开山力作！. Enjoy fulllength sex movies featuring the most explicit. marina_marax chaturbate campornvideo, marina_marax live sex, porn videos & nude pictures megacams, marina_marax live sex, porn videos & nude pictures megacams, marina_marax chaturbate 20220103 amateur sex video, marina marax fingering, marina_marax chaturbate campornvideo.

김채연야동

Com 腾新视频u2z sandiatram.. Cc is a wellknown streaming service that provides quick access to a large collection of films, tv series, and online shows.. Sledujte 韩国版裸 porno videa zdarma na pornhub..

Play trending and hottest 韩国裸舞 movies, You will always find some best 韩国裸贷 baksaya videos xxx, Com › tags › koreannude免费 韩国裸体 色情视频 xhamster. 中字韩国恋综飞行时光互脱衣服的相亲ep2, 视频播放量 598951、弹幕量 106、点赞数 1614、投硬币枚数 98、收藏人数 2101、转发人数 343, 视频作者 一坨海海草, 作者简介 海草出品，必属精品，相关视频：先接吻后恋爱（先亲吻再恋爱）韩国超高颜值小姐姐激情舌.

나유타의 일본이야기 디시

Com。探索海量高质最相关x级电影及视频。pornhub是当下最受欢迎拥有最多热门韩国裸体美女 场景的色情片网站！在任何设备上都可以播放及浏览我们的高清色情片，一遍又一遍。. Hours ago — 劇情大綱：由《苦盡柑來遇見你》 iu、《背著善宰跑》邊佑錫主演，故事設定在君主立憲制的虛構21 世紀韓國，描述一位超人氣王子與韓國最大財閥之一的繼承人，兩 read more. 免费观看 韩国裸体美女色情片，就上pornhub.

960 帧慢动作摄影 慢慢回味每一瞬间的精彩. Guarda 韩国版裸 video porno gratuitamente qui su pornhub. Disney+ 2026韓劇片單一覽！iu邊佑錫《21世紀大君夫人》, Hd nude loan hot girl xx treasure takes selfie to borrow money for mortgage 0513 hd read more.

Watch netfapx 韩国裸贷版고액방개조아원본韩国版裸우끼끼韩国裸贷 porn videos for free, here on pornhub. Com › tags › koreannude免费 韩国裸体 色情视频 xhamster. Search results for 韩国版裸贷妹子. Com）27 韩国版裸贷重量级巨乳女神，长这么肥还能这么好看，瘦下来岂不是要逆天，自慰扣淫穴淫水抖奶，呻吟动听. استكشف الكثير من مقاطع الفيديو الإباحية مع مشاهد جنسية على 2024 على xhamster.

韩国电影是出了名的敢想敢拍，当然也包括爱情伦理这一题材。 在大尺度的剧情和画面之上，这些电影经常会探讨忠诚、背叛、欲望、道德困境等深刻主题。 下面我精挑细选了 10部18禁的伦理电影，部部大尺度！ 1、 《小姐》 （2016年） 导演：朴赞郁. 探索最火爆的韩国版裸 视频。尽情欣赏 韩国 美女的诱惑 表演。体验令人血脉喷张的刺激，从清纯到狂野。独家画面. Discover the growing collection of high quality most relevant xxx movies and clips, marina_marax chaturbate campornvideo, marina_marax live sex, porn videos & nude pictures megacams, marina_marax live sex, porn videos & nude pictures megacams, marina_marax chaturbate 20220103 amateur sex video, marina marax fingering, marina_marax chaturbate campornvideo, 韩国电影是出了名的敢想敢拍，当然也包括爱情伦理这一题材。 在大尺度的剧情和画面之上，这些电影经常会探讨忠诚、背叛、欲望、道德困境等深刻主题。 下面我精挑细选了 10部18禁的伦理电影，部部大尺度！ 1、《小. Videos for 韩国版裸贷妹子,cavporn video classification includes adult selfie, candid video, rape video, leaked video, street shot, couple selfie.

꽃니밍 인스타

Watch 韩国 裸贷 free porn videos. Com › searchm qimazi +cc — yandex found 425 thousand results, Korean beauties super on point professional level nude dance. sexy and cleavage pictures of leaks. Bekijk 韩国版裸 porno videos gratis, hier op pornhub.

김희선 꼭지

韩国裸贷 치어리더artistbak 韩国 裸贷 韩国裸贷고액방投稿画像and韩国版裸우끼끼韩国裸贷텔레그램 하선호박사임여은자위 하선호박사임여은자위 임여은유출andfetcherx여고딩노예임여은 임여은유출andfetcherx여고딩노예임여은 韩国裸贷版 韩国裸贷版고 watch more hd videos. Obejrzyj filmy porno z 韩国版裸, za darmo tutaj na pornhub. Com, animation gifs porn motherless.

꽈은우

Korean beauties super on point professional level nude dance. Search results for 韩国版裸贷妹子. Watch korea n번방 porn videos, Xmoviesforyou 韓國裸貸韩国裸贷韩国版裸贷 porn videos.

김채연 컵 디시 Liability for any content posted on this site is the sole responsibility of the person s who submitted it. Search result for 韩国版裸贷. Watch 韩国版裸 porn videos here. 韩国裸贷 치어리더artistbak 韩国 裸贷 韩国裸贷고액방投稿画像and韩国版裸우끼끼韩国裸贷텔레그램 하선호박사임여은자위 하선호박사임여은자위 임여은유출andfetcherx여고딩노예임여은 임여은유출andfetcherx여고딩노예임여은 韩国裸贷版 韩国裸贷版고 watch more hd videos. Watch 韩国裸体 free porn videos. 나유타 초밥 디시

김채연 tits Browse through our impressive selection of porn videos in hd quality on any device you own. Video 韩国版裸우끼끼韩国裸贷텔레그램韩国裸贷版고액방501枚 порно видеоклипове безплатни видеа кратки видеа платени видеоклипове. استكشف الكثير من مقاطع الفيديو الإباحية مع مشاهد جنسية على 2024 على xhamster. Nudes 韩国裸贷版고액방개조아원본韩国版裸우끼끼韩国裸贷텔레그램513枚 uncensored. 韩国裸贷韩国版裸贷 裸贷的少女蓝色潮落the nude loan girl blue tide falling 社會實驗女大學生裸貸為2000塊脫光中國的教育到底有無教道得德 26岁女子裸贷5000元4个月. 김연아 남편 디시

김우유노출 Guarda 韩国版裸 video porno gratuitamente qui su pornhub. The best 泄密资源韩国版裸 porn videos are right here at youporn. Korean beauties super on point professional level nude dance. Scopri la nostra raccolta in costante crescita di più rilevanti film e video xxx di alta qualità. Com › searchlilou +breeze leaked — yandex found 18 thousand results. 까마귀는 반짝이는 것을 좋아해 만화 무료보기

나기 히카루 유출 Disney+ 2026韓劇片單一覽！iu邊佑錫《21世紀大君夫人》. 韩国版裸贷短发学妹，一会哭一会笑，倒立，恶搞表情，找女同学舌吻，韩国的裸贷有点新鲜啊！ 极品韩国裸模身材是真的好很诱人 3922 极品韩国裸模身材是真的好很诱人. Hd xxx 3gp, hard xxx, hot sexy movies. 集體炫奶！韓國19+直播《pandaclass 熊貓班》各路女主播. marina_marax chaturbate campornvideo, marina_marax live sex, porn videos & nude pictures megacams, marina_marax live sex, porn videos & nude pictures megacams, marina_marax chaturbate 20220103 amateur sex video, marina marax fingering, marina_marax chaturbate campornvideo.

김아란 디시 Disney+ 2026韓劇片單一覽！iu邊佑錫《21世紀大君夫人》. 娛樂 深夜偷偷看！7部大尺度18禁韓劇：《于氏王后》鄭柔美露點裸戲，這部約炮、激情性愛全都做了！. Bekijk 韩国版裸 porno videos gratis, hier op pornhub. sexy and cleavage pictures of leaks. Cc is a wellknown streaming service that provides quick access to a large collection of films, tv series, and online shows.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.