Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

フィギュアスケートの平昌五輪代表・田中刑事が22日、結婚を発表した 31歳の誕生日に行った報告に、ファンからも祝福が殺到した 田中は4月に競技からの. フィギュアスケート男子の18年平昌五輪代表で、22年に引退した田中刑事氏（31）が22日、自身のインスタグラムを更新。結婚を発表した。 この日. 田中 刑事｜フィギュアスケートグランプリシリーズ2020. フィギュアスケートの平昌五輪代表として知られる田中刑事さんが22日、自身のインスタグラム @2211keijiで結婚を発表し、ファンの間で大きな反響を呼んでいる。 投稿では穏やかな笑顔の写真とともに、支えてくれる人々への感謝が綴られていた。.

Avdbs.ccom

写真羽生結弦、日野龍樹、田中刑事のスリーショット！同期がそろった 男子バレー関田誠大が語る、移籍したからこそ感じたサントリー.. 3枠目を勝ち取った田中刑事の夜練 限界の先につながってい.. 田中 刑事（たなか けいじ、ラテン文字 keiji tanaka、1994年11月22日 ）は、日本のフィギュアスケート選手（男子シングル）。愛称はデカ。岡山県倉敷市出身。2022年4月11日.. フィギュアスケートの田中刑事、31歳誕生日に結婚を発表！ フィギュアスケート界の新たなニュースが届きました。 平昌五輪代表の 田中刑事 さんは、11月22日、彼の31歳の誕生日に自身のinstagramを通じて結婚を発表しました。..

Aliceholic Jav

Com › topics › detailフィギュアスケート平昌五輪代表・田中刑事さんが結婚 2022年に引退. フィギュアスケートの田中刑事、31歳誕生日に結婚を発表！ フィギュアスケート界の新たなニュースが届きました。 平昌五輪代表の 田中刑事 さんは、11月22日、彼の31歳の誕生日に自身のinstagramを通じて結婚を発表しました。. フィギュア田中刑事「苦しんだ経験を糧に」 引退会見. 元フィギュア五輪代表・田中刑事さん 結婚を発表「とても幸せ」 妻と和装ウエディングs披露 20251122 2025（最終更新 1122 2032） 388文字 記事配信, フィギュアスケートの平昌五輪代表として知られる田中刑事さんが22日、自身のインスタグラム @2211keijiで結婚を発表し、ファンの間で大きな反響を呼んでいる。 投稿では穏やかな笑顔の写真とともに、支えてくれる人々への感謝が綴られていた。.

Alya Hentai Sex

フィギュアスケート男子の18年平昌五輪代表で、22年に引退した田中刑事氏（31）が22日、自身のインスタグラムを更新。結婚を発表した。 この日. フィギュアスケート選手の田中刑事（31）が11月22日、instagramを更新。 移籍 セルティックから期限付き. Jp › articles › 89ed5e6063aa4f7217210元フィギュア五輪代表・田中刑事 妻も登場で結婚報告「とても幸せを感, 4回転サルコーを2本成功させ、フリー今季自己最高167・61点を出した。3位だった昨年12月の全日本選手権で演技の手応えをつかんでおり、「全日本の感覚を1 read more.

フィギュアスケートの平昌五輪男子シングル代表・田中刑事が11日、自身のツイッターで競技から引退することを発表した。 同い年の五輪連覇王者・羽生結弦らと切磋琢磨し、長らく活躍してきた27歳。, エジプトから戦時下のレバノンに移籍！ それでも快適な生活を送れている理由は. 写真羽生結弦、日野龍樹、田中刑事のスリーショット！同期がそろった 男子バレー関田誠大が語る、移籍したからこそ感じたサントリー, 4月11日にツイッターとインスタグラムで現役引退を表明した田中刑事は、4月29日に行われた「プリンスアイスワールド2022－2023 brand new storyiii 横浜.

Com › figureskaterdegichitanakaフィギュアスケーター田中刑事、31歳の誕生日に結婚を発表. しかし、今回のニュースが特別なのは結婚だけではありません。 競技引退後の挑戦、プロスケーターとコーチという二つの道──。 田中さんは新しい人生の節目を迎えながら、未来へ向けた大きな一歩も同時に踏み出しています。 そこで今回は、. 2018年世界選手権 でショートプログラム『メモリーズ（ザ・プロフェット）』を演じる田中 全身を黒一色で包んだgala『just like fire』の衣装も印象的だったが、ここ最近は田中自身がデザインに関与し、衣装の生地も自ら選んでいる。.

Aru117

引退表明の田中刑事 五輪出場の思い出は「意外と薄い」と笑顔, 田中刑事が2つの夢を掲げ、新たなスタートを切った。27 」夫がロッテへ移籍、日常生活は何が変わった？ 「生理が来た時は泣き. 連載の第4回は田中刑事（倉敷芸術科学大）の過去3シーズンを振り返る。 補強診断パ・リーグ編 積極補強を見せた西武、エースがライバル球団へ移籍した. フィギュアスケート選手の田中刑事（31）が11月22日、instagramを更新。 移籍 セルティックから期限付き, 主な成績 19 gpカナダ大会 3位 18 全日本選手権 3位 18 平昌五輪 18位 17 全日本選手権 2位read more. フィギュア田中刑事「苦しんだ経験を糧に」 引退会見.

amirawest av 確かな歩みを刻んだ田中刑事の3年間 課題は「4回転と表現. フィギュアスケートの平昌五輪代表・田中刑事が22日、結婚を発表した 31歳の誕生日に行った報告に、ファンからも祝福が殺到した 田中は4月に競技からの. 4回転サルコーを2本成功させ、フリー今季自己最高167・61点を出した。3位だった昨年12月の全日本選手権で演技の手応えをつかんでおり、「全日本の感覚を1 read more. しかし、今回のニュースが特別なのは結婚だけではありません。 競技引退後の挑戦、プロスケーターとコーチという二つの道──。 田中さんは新しい人生の節目を迎えながら、未来へ向けた大きな一歩も同時に踏み出しています。 そこで今回は、. 田中刑事が2つの夢を掲げ、新たなスタートを切った。27歳で20年の競技生活からの引退を決意し、4月末の会見でこう語った。 「新たな目標の1つ. av 노아 야동

avmov 김현아 田中刑事というスケーターが真価を発揮するのは、これからなのかもしれない 世界最高gkが振り返る「ユヴェントス移籍の真実」。バルサ行きも浮上した守護神. Jp › articles › 20251122元フィギュア五輪代表・田中刑事さん 結婚を発表「とても幸せ」 妻と. フィギュア田中刑事「苦しんだ経験を糧に」 引退会見. 4回転サルコーを2本成功させ、フリー今季自己最高167・61点を出した。3位だった昨年12月の全日本選手権で演技の手応えをつかんでおり、「全日本の感覚を1 read more. 元フィギュア五輪代表・田中刑事さん 結婚を発表「とても幸せ」 妻と和装ウエディングs披露 20251122 2025（最終更新 1122 2032） 388文字 記事配信. aki gay

arooo 망가 実質残り1枠を、田中刑事（倉敷芸術科学大大学院）、無良崇人（洋菓子のヒロタ）、村上大介（陽進堂）、友野一希（同志社大）らが争う展開が予想された。 かくして. 田中刑事が2つの夢を掲げ、新たなスタートを切った。27 」夫がロッテへ移籍、日常生活は何が変わった？ 「生理が来た時は泣き. 還暦超えベテラン俳優、ホリプロ移籍を発表 「持てる力を余す. 田中 刑事（たなか けいじ、ラテン文字 keiji tanaka、1994年11月22日 ）は、日本のフィギュアスケート選手（男子シングル）。愛称はデカ。岡山県倉敷市出身。2022年4月11日. エジプトから戦時下のレバノンに移籍！ それでも快適な生活を送れている理由は. animal control apopka

avdanyuuwiki 確かな歩みを刻んだ田中刑事の3年間 課題は「4回転と表現. フィギュアスケート男子の18年平昌五輪代表で、22年に引退した田中刑事氏（31）が22日、自身のインスタグラムを更新。結婚を発表した。 この日. フィギュアスケート男子の18年平昌五輪代表で、22年に引退した田中刑事氏（31）が22日、自身のインスタグラムを更新。結婚を発表した。 この日. しかし、今回のニュースが特別なのは結婚だけではありません。 競技引退後の挑戦、プロスケーターとコーチという二つの道──。 田中さんは新しい人生の節目を迎えながら、未来へ向けた大きな一歩も同時に踏み出しています。 そこで今回は、. Org › wiki › 田中刑事田中刑事 wikipedia.

av 010054 4回転サルコーを2本成功させ、フリー今季自己最高167・61点を出した。3位だった昨年12月の全日本選手権で演技の手応えをつかんでおり、「全日本の感覚を1 read more. Com › topics › detailフィギュアスケート平昌五輪代表・田中刑事さんが結婚 2022年に引退. 確かな歩みを刻んだ田中刑事の3年間 課題は「4回転と表現. 田中 刑事｜フィギュアスケートグランプリシリーズ2020. Com › figureskaterdegichitanakaフィギュアスケーター田中刑事、31歳の誕生日に結婚を発表.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.