Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Vagu289 看似纯洁的家庭主妇因催情油而兴奋又恐慌卑鄙的售货员的阴茎摧毁了她的羞耻心小野坂ゆいか. 小野坂由香 yuika onosaka,小野坂ゆいか的故事将永远铭刻在观众的心中，成为每个人在面对生活挑战时的灵感和动力源泉。 她的成长历程不仅仅是一个女孩成长的故事，更是一次关于勇气和希望的心灵之旅。. 4kvec687 我把在我打工的地方工作的漂亮已婚女人带回家并与她进行中出性爱 小野坂唯香. Vagu289 看似纯洁的家庭主妇因催情油而兴奋又恐慌卑鄙的售货员的阴茎摧毁了她的羞耻心小野坂ゆいか.

덕코프 특수변기세정제

Genre humiliation, ol, individual, plot, creampie, massage oil, hd, exclusive. 小野坂由香小野坂唯香 小野坂ゆいか yuika onozaka主演的a片 av 影片, Adn734 在丈夫眼前被侵犯—背德的哀歌小野坂由香.

데빌서머너

小野坂由香 yuika onosaka,小野坂ゆいか的故事将永远铭刻在观众的心中，成为每个人在面对生活挑战时的灵感和动力源泉。 她的成长历程不仅仅是一个女孩成长的故事，更是一次关于勇气和希望的心灵之旅。. 影片番号ngod318,《こいんぱの妻 臭いクレーム男達に謝罪としてカラダを差し出したら車中で奴らが飽きるまでハメられ捨てられてしまいました。 小野坂ゆいか》由小野坂ゆいか出演,由jet eizo发行于20260204. 此作品曾在本站上傳，現已更新至中文字幕版。 免費視頻裸聊！. 中文字幕 20260107 014000 adn734 中文字幕 夫の目の前で, 小野坂由香小野坂唯香 小野坂ゆいか yuika onozaka主演的a片 av 影片. Com › archives › 1690肉肉的小野坂由香 yuika onosaka,小野坂ゆいか的心理调解：番号ipzz.

Ntrなんかウダウダ拒否してたけど結局めちゃくちゃ気持ち良さそうにしてたしwinwinでしょ いつもは拒否る中出しもさせてくれたしw 小野坂ゆいか メーカー宣伝文）いえ～い ゆうまくん見てる～？ 今どんな気持ち～？ ww, 小野坂由香 yuika onosaka,小野坂ゆいか经历了159次极限训练，逐步觉醒出强大的内在力量。 她在恶劣环境中挑战自我，提升了智慧与适应能力，成为一个引领者和激励者，影响了周围人。 她的故事展示了真正的强大来自于内心的坚定与成长。, 小野坂唯香小野坂ゆいか,onosaka yuika. 小野坂ゆいか是一位来自日本的新晋av女优，现在是bstar事务所的一员。她有着充满活力的笑容和好身材，被称为肉感女神！出道时年仅22岁，是一名ol。她的三围是b102cm、w62cm、h100cm。bm 出道是因为好奇心。 在2024年6月，她以小野坂ゆいか的身份正式加入了ideapocket，并开始了她的av之旅。.

小野坂ゆいか出演的av 在線看 missav.. 三围：b97cm（另有说法为b102cm）、w62cm、h100cm 外文名：onosaka yuika、小野坂ゆいか 二、职业生涯 出道背景：2024年6月，小野坂唯香作为ip社的新人出道，尽管ip社官网初期对她的名字只字未提，连作品页面都是一片空白，但这样的宣传策略反而为她赢得了更多的..

這是位有點奇怪的新人！ 她是小野坂ゆいか小野坂唯香，是下個月以作品「first impression 174 肉感ヒロイン元気チャーミングな笑顔と、完熟フレッシュ. 繁體中文 简体中文 english 日本語, Adn734 中文字幕 夫の目の前で犯○れ. Hours ago same202アタッカーズから配信されてる私を犯した大嫌いな男の、あの腰使いが忘れられなくて 小野坂ゆいかに出てるav女優名を紹介。また別名義や他の出演作品も併せてまとめてます。.

小野坂ゆいか（おのさかゆいか）が出演するav作品『私を た大嫌いな男の、あの腰使いが忘れられなくて』（same202 same00202）の画面キャプチャ付きレビューと解説、ダウンロード、ストリーミング再生、無料サンプル。, Ntrなんかウダウダ拒否してたけど結局めちゃくちゃ気持ち良さそうにしてたしwinwinでしょ いつもは拒否る中出しもさせてくれたしw 小野坂ゆいか メーカー宣伝文）いえ～い ゆうまくん見てる～？ 今どんな気持ち～？ ww. Actress yuika onozaka, 小野坂ゆいかの年齢、誕生日、身長、bwh、血液型、趣味などの基本プロフィールを詳しく紹介。 デビューから現在までの出演作や最新情報をまとめたファン必見の詳細ページです。 女優データを知りたい人に最適なプロフィール解説です。. Likes, 0 comments aaronkang431 on j ip社給人滿臉問號的奇怪新人「小野坂ゆいか 小野坂唯花」，為什麼奇怪？雖然有說她是 idepaocket的新人女優，可是在アイポケ的官網首頁沒有標出她的藝名，作品介紹的網頁也是一片空白，當然你是知道她叫小野坂ゆいか 小野坂唯香，在fanza預約作品的.

드라마 설사

Day ago 無料高画質有修正エロ動画ストリーミングそしてダウンロード, 最高のメーカーアタッカーズ, 人気のav女優小野坂ゆいか, same202 私を犯した大嫌いな男の、あの腰使いが忘れられなくて 小野坂ゆいか. Videos search results for 小野坂ゆいか, Likes, 0 comments aaronkang431 on j ip社給人滿臉問號的奇怪新人「小野坂ゆいか 小野坂唯花」，為什麼奇怪？雖然有說她是 idepaocket的新人女優，可是在アイポケ的官網首頁沒有標出她的藝名，作品介紹的網頁也是一片空白，當然你是知道她叫小野坂ゆいか 小野坂唯香，在fanza預約作品的, 中文字幕pppe306 我女朋友的姐姐用她的巨乳和中. Com › archives › 1690肉肉的小野坂由香 yuika onosaka,小野坂ゆいか的心理调解：番号ipzz, 有码字幕 vagu289 自提征用看似纯洁的家庭主妇因催情油而兴奋又恐慌卑鄙的售货员的阴茎摧毁了她的羞耻心，小野坂.

小野坂由香 yuika onosaka,小野坂ゆいか的故事将永远铭刻在观众的心中，成为每个人在面对生活挑战时的灵感和动力源泉。 她的成长历程不仅仅是一个女孩成长的故事，更是一次关于勇气和希望的心灵之旅。.. 4kvec687 我把在我打工的地方工作的漂亮已婚女人带回家并与她进行中出性爱 小野坂唯香.. 小野坂由香（2002年2月9日出生）是隶属于bambi promotion的日本av女演员。 小野坂ゆいか 小野坂唯花 的影片..

Actress yuika onozaka. Com › content › 20251012000004265005菜鳥女優撞臉台灣啦啦隊！出道半年背景超硬「先低調後爆發」. Ua025123台版中文，小野坂ゆいか。 我摯愛的青梅竹馬被一場突如其來的暴雨淋濕了，沒能回家。 小野坂唯花 5.

덕코브 갤 小野坂由香小野坂唯香 小野坂ゆいか yuika onozaka主演的a片 av 影片. 小野坂由香（2002年2月9日出生）是隶属于bambi promotion的日本av女演员。 小野坂ゆいか 小野坂唯花 的影片. Ntrなんかウダウダ拒否してたけど結局めちゃくちゃ気持ち良さそうにしてたしwinwinでしょ いつもは拒否る中出しもさせてくれたしw 小野坂ゆいか メーカー宣伝文）いえ～い ゆうまくん見てる～？ 今どんな気持ち～？ ww. Day ago 無料高画質有修正エロ動画ストリーミングそしてダウンロード, 最高のメーカーアタッカーズ, 人気のav女優小野坂ゆいか, same202 私を犯した大嫌いな男の、あの腰使いが忘れられなくて 小野坂ゆいか. Adn734 在丈夫眼前被侵犯—背德的哀歌小野坂由香. 디시 너붕 우유

덕코프 디시 Adn734 中文字幕 夫の目の前で犯○れ. 影片番号ngod318,《こいんぱの妻 臭いクレーム男達に謝罪としてカラダを差し出したら車中で奴らが飽きるまでハメられ捨てられてしまいました。 小野坂ゆいか》由小野坂ゆいか出演,由jet eizo发行于20260204. Adn734 在丈夫眼前被侵犯—背德的哀歌小野坂由香. 本女優頁面的影片需登入後才能繼續瀏覽 免費註冊新帳號. Adn734 在丈夫眼前被侵犯—背德的哀歌小野坂由香. 돈다발녀

덕코프 갱 小野坂由香小野坂唯香 小野坂ゆいか yuika onozaka主演的a片 av 影片. Day ago 無料高画質有修正エロ動画ストリーミングそしてダウンロード, 最高のメーカーアタッカーズ, 人気のav女優小野坂ゆいか, same202 私を犯した大嫌いな男の、あの腰使いが忘れられなくて 小野坂ゆいか. 這是位有點奇怪的新人！ 她是小野坂ゆいか小野坂唯香，是下個月以作品「first impression 174 肉感ヒロイン元気チャーミングな笑顔と、完熟フレッシュ. 小野坂ゆいかの年齢、誕生日、身長、bwh、血液型、趣味などの基本プロフィールを詳しく紹介。 デビューから現在までの出演作や最新情報をまとめたファン必見の詳細ページです。 女優データを知りたい人に最適なプロフィール解説です。. 三围：b97cm（另有说法为b102cm）、w62cm、h100cm 外文名：onosaka yuika、小野坂ゆいか 二、职业生涯 出道背景：2024年6月，小野坂唯香作为ip社的新人出道，尽管ip社官网初期对她的名字只字未提，连作品页面都是一片空白，但这样的宣传策略反而为她赢得了更多的. 드그

디그레이더 야동 Com › content › 20251012000004265005菜鳥女優撞臉台灣啦啦隊！出道半年背景超硬「先低調後爆發」. 小野坂由香（2002年2月9日出生）是隶属于bambi promotion的日本av女演员。 小野坂ゆいか 小野坂唯花 的影片. Shf005 與最棒的巨乳情人、最棒的不倫中出性交76 小野坂. 繁體中文 简体中文 english 日本語. Com › content › question唯香小野坂简介 智能助手.

도리 씨 y 101 한국 Adn734 在丈夫眼前被侵犯—背德的哀歌小野坂由香. Day ago 無料高画質有修正エロ動画ストリーミングそしてダウンロード, 最高のメーカーアタッカーズ, 人気のav女優小野坂ゆいか, same202 私を犯した大嫌いな男の、あの腰使いが忘れられなくて 小野坂ゆいか. Com › content › 20251012000004265005菜鳥女優撞臉台灣啦啦隊！出道半年背景超硬「先低調後爆發」. Com › content › question唯香小野坂简介 智能助手. Com › archives › 1690肉肉的小野坂由香 yuika onosaka,小野坂ゆいか的心理调解：番号ipzz.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.