Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

방송용핵쟁이 ㅃㅎ 에이펙스 레전드 인방 미니 갤러리. 맨질맨질한 찐빵 젖가슴 bj닝ㅎ 세일러복 은꼴 짤방. 이 페이지는 미선짱의 매력적인 전신 사진을 소개하며, 다양한 스타일과 매력을 가진 그녀의 영상들을 한곳에 모았습니다. ㅃㅎ야 전프로에 방송키고 겜한다고 핵의심 안하는줄 아나본데 조절해라 폭로한다.

다양한 여친짤과 움짤이 여러분을 기다립니다.. 다양한 여친짤과 움짤이 여러분을 기다립니다.. 샌드박스 네트워크 소속의 유튜버 및 치지직 스트리머..

현아 레전드 디시

혼죠 카호

ㅇㅎ 야짤 모음 스푸트니크의기묘 2025.. この作品 「ㅃㅎ」 は 「r18」「스트리머」 等のタグがつけられた「healthykim」さんのイラストです。.. Cr › fanbox › userpost 003 ㅃㅎ by artostre from pixiv fanbox kemono..

목젖으로 콧길을 막고 혀뿌리로 연구개를 막았다가 세게 터뜨려 내는 연구개 파열음이다. Net › artworks › 104473750pixiv イラストコミュニケーションサービス. 솔직히 ㅂㅌㅂ 야짤같은거 ㅎㅌㅁ에 ㅈㄴ 많은거보면. ㅇㅇㄱ공식적으로 ㅇㅅㄷ 야짤을 금지 시켰지만 못내리는. 귀여운 여친짤 모음 백지헌, 츄정, 김이삭.

3번 꽉차 보여요 부럽네여 보구있으면 흥분되는 야짤 감사해요 내친구한테 들컸당 밤에 함께 봐야징 ♡♡♡, 맨질맨질한 찐빵 젖가슴 bj닝ㅎ 세일러복, 당분간 대피소를 애용하자2 ㅇㅇ2014. Gif 야짤 칼같이 짜르는데 왜 일베와 어그로는 칼같이 안짜르냐 이건데 2.

Net › 652190979ㅇㅎ 야짤 모음 dogdrip. 처음에는 짤종류 하나였는데 점점 시리즈가 늘음 ㅅㅂ, 방송용핵쟁이 ㅃㅎ 에이펙스 레전드 인방 미니 갤러리. 30 1413 조회 424 내용skip. 칫빠이 여자 스트리머 채널 잘 알아두도록. 목젖으로 콧길을 막고 혀뿌리로 연구개를 막았다가 세게 터뜨려 내는 연구개 파열음이다.

호야 헌팅성공미연

Com › 361024599해연갤 게임 앾 ㅎㅂㅈㅇ 도트 야짤모음1. 30 1413 조회 424 내용skip, 방송용핵쟁이 ㅃㅎ 에이펙스 레전드 인방 미니 갤러리, 여기는 할 수밖에없으니까 하는거임 왜. 대구 침산동 디저트 맛집, 크럼키에서 먹어본 크럼블 쿠키 후기, 줜갗은 짤 삭제하면서 관리 조빠지게 해줬더니.

Net652190979 과거 세대의 도덕 검열과 미를 위한 투쟁, 여성의 신체를 매개로 표현된 근원적 아름다움, ㅇㅎ 야짤 모음 스푸트니크의기묘 2025. Net › artworks › 104473750pixiv イラストコミュニケーションサービス. 귀여운 여친짤 모음 백지헌, 츄정, 김이삭.

헤이딜러 채용 디시 줜갗은 짤 삭제하면서 관리 조빠지게 해줬더니. 나는 디저트 맛집을 잘 포스팅안하는데. 당분간 대피소를 애용하자2 ㅇㅇ2014. Com › 361024599해연갤 게임 앾 ㅎㅂㅈㅇ 도트 야짤모음1. 당분간 대피소를 애용하자2 ㅇㅇ2014. 헤테릭

협동 타워 디펜스 티어 디시 칫빠이 여자 스트리머 채널 잘 알아두도록. 나는 디저트 맛집을 잘 포스팅안하는데. 배경있는거배경뺀거스트신청 받는거 자제하라고 하긴했는데 공지도 아니고 걍알아만두래서받긴받을건데 그냥 스트이름하고 아카콘만 하지말고 뭐라도 같이적어주세요 해주세요 이정도만해도 스트신청댓글만 다는 사람들이좀. 맨질맨질한 찐빵 젖가슴 bj닝ㅎ 세일러복 은꼴 짤방. 대구 침산동 디저트 맛집, 크럼키에서 먹어본 크럼블 쿠키 후기. 헬몽 얼굴

함 예진 미드 디시 방송용핵쟁이 ㅃㅎ 에이펙스 레전드 인방 미니 갤러리. この作品 「ㅃㅎ」 は 「r18」「스트리머」 等のタグがつけられた「healthykim」さんのイラストです。. 목젖으로 콧길을 막고 혀뿌리로 연구개를 막았다가 세게 터뜨려 내는 연구개 파열음이다. 솔직히 ㅂㅌㅂ 야짤같은거 ㅎㅌㅁ에 ㅈㄴ 많은거보면. ㅃㅎ야 전프로에 방송키고 겜한다고 핵의심 안하는줄 아나본데 조절해라 폭로한다. 헤이즈리버브 디시

허벅지 비비기 ㅇㅇㄱ공식적으로 ㅇㅅㄷ 야짤을 금지 시켰지만 못내리는. 처음에는 짤종류 하나였는데 점점 시리즈가 늘음 ㅅㅂ. 스트리머 ㅃㅎ healthykimのイラスト. 솔직히 ㅂㅌㅂ 야짤같은거 ㅎㅌㅁ에 ㅈㄴ 많은거보면. 나는 디저트 맛집을 잘 포스팅안하는데.

헤비 고소 ㅃㅎ야 전프로에 방송키고 겜한다고 핵의심 안하는줄 아나본데 조절해라 폭로한다. ㅇㅎ 야짤 모음 스푸트니크의기묘 2025. 방송용핵쟁이 ㅃㅎ 에이펙스 레전드 인방 미니 갤러리. 여기는 할 수밖에없으니까 하는거임 왜. この作品 「ㅃㅎ」 は 「r18」「스트리머」 のタグがつけられた「jundam」さんのイラストです。 「해당 캐릭터는 가상의 캐릭터이며, 만 19세 이상의 성인입니다s.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.