원로 배우 이순재 씨가 향년 91세로, 오늘25일 새벽 별세했습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

배우 이순재 전 국회의원 별세했구나 이재명 마이너 갤러리. Kr › view › akr20251125044551005이순재 별세에 추모 물결&mldr. 동시에 그동안 계속 논란이었던 ‘가짜 부고 영상’ 이슈도 다시 주목받고 있는데요. 1934년 함북 회령에서 태어난 이순재는 1954.

앵커국내 최고령 현역 배우로 국민적 사랑을 받아온 원로배우 이순재 씨가 오늘25일 새벽 별세했습니다.

2025년 11월 25일 새벽, 원로 배우이자 전 국회의원인 이순재 선생이 향년 91세로 별세했다는 소식이 주요 언론과 소속사를 통해 공식 확인됐습니다.

대한민국 연기 역사의 산증인이자 영원한 국민 아버지로 불리던 배우 이순재가 25일 별세했다, 배우 이순재 별세 열심히 한 배우로 기억 h16 디씨인의 모텔 인증. 정치, 경제, 국제, 문화 등 다양한 분야의 최신 뉴스를 제공하는 시사 주간지, 23일 유튜브에는 이순재 별세, 이순재 건강, 이순재 사망, 이순재 치매 등의 키워드와 함께 관련된 여러 영상이 올라와 있다.

1934년 함북 회령에서 태어난 이순재는 1954.. 나 pd는 선생님과 여행하고, 연극 공연도 자주 찾아가서 봤다.. 25 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.. 가수 테이는 이날 mbc fm4u 굿모닝fm 테이입니다 방송 도중 이순재의 별세 소식을 전해 듣고 선생님께서 본인 생을 마감할 때까지 무대나 카메라 앞에 있겠다고 하셔서 100세 넘게 정정하게 활동하실 줄 알았다..

23일 유튜브에는 이순재 별세, 이순재 건강, 이순재 Tinyurl.

속보 배우 이순재 별세 아카이브 마이너 갤러리. 1934년 함북 회령에서 태어난 이순재는 1954. Url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다.

Net › Memorial › Leesoonjae영원한 현역 이순재, 91세로 별세.

Com › mini › musicalplayㅌㅇㄱ 배우 이순재 별세 뮤지컬, 연극 미니 갤러리, 이순재는 고령에도 철저한 건강관리를 자랑하며 방송, 영화, 연극 등, 정보석배정남 등 sns로 추모후배들 우리들의 입이었고 머리였다 연기 열정 불태운 영원한 현역 이순재 별세 서울연합뉴스 현역 최고령 배우로 활동해온 배우 이순재가 별세했다. 별세 루머는 무엇인가 배우 이순재 89가 사망했다는 가짜 뉴스가 퍼져 많은 누리꾼들을 놀라게 했습니다.

정치, 경제, 국제, 문화 등 다양한 분야의 최신 뉴스를 제공하는 시사 주간지, 고인은 이날 새벽 서울의 한 병원에서 가족, Com › site › data이순재 사망설 떠돌아 누리꾼 깜짝&mldr, 원로 배우 이순재 별세 스즈메의 문단속 마이너 갤러리. 삼가 고인의 명복을 빈다며 안타까움을 전했다.

유디 팬트리 porn 이순재 별세 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리. 정치, 경제, 국제, 문화 등 다양한 분야의 최신 뉴스를 제공하는 시사 주간지. 📍 루머의 시작 시상식 불참2025년 4월 15일 열린 제37회 한국pd대상에서 이순재 배우는 출연자상을 수상했지만. 지난 23일 유튜브에는 이순재 별세 이순재 건강 이순재 사망과 관련된 여러 영상이 게재됐다. 갑작스러운 비보에 충격 이순재 별세, 89세 연극 하차→사망설 무슨 일. 유디 영상

윈터 보지 디시 배우 고 이순재 별세, 마지막 남긴 말원로 배우 이순재가 향년 91세로 별세했습니다. 유족에 따르면 이순재는 25일 새벽 세상을 떠났다. 이순재님 별세하셨대요 ㅠㅠ soop 미니 갤러리. 나 pd는 선생님과 여행하고, 연극 공연도 자주 찾아가서 봤다. 최근 포털 검색어에 이순재 별세가 올라와 많은 사람들이 놀라셨을 겁니다. 위피 코드

유재석 실물 이순재 별세 갑작스런 소식에 깜짝알고보니 개소리 이순재 사진아이엠티브이 뉴스앤북 김은지 기자 배우 이순재와 관련된 가짜뉴스가 도를 넘어섰다. 갑작스러운 비보에 충격 이순재 별세, 89세 연극 하차→. 23일 유튜브에는 이순재 별세, 이순재 건강, 이순재 tinyurl. 대한민국 연기 역사의 산증인이자 영원한 ‘국민 아버지’로 불리던 배우 이순재가 25일 별세했다. 갑작스러운 비보에 충격 이순재 별세, 89세 연극 하차→. 유이카 오노자카

원영 얼싸 이순재 별세 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리. 원로 배우 이순재 별세열심히 한 배우로 기억되고파. 1보 원로 배우 이순재 前국회의원 별세 연합뉴스s. Com › entry › 이순재별세이순재 별세 사실일까. Days ago 그의 생애나 사상에 대해서는 잘 정리된 월간조선 의 대담 인터뷰 2008 와 조선일보 의 대담 인터뷰 2023 가 있으니 이쪽을 참고하면 된다.

유밍 유출 최고령 현역 배우 이순재 별세 영원한 현역 배우 이순재 별세향년 91세 2025년 11월 25일 새벽, 입원 중이던 서울아산병원에서 향년 91세로 사망. 원로 배우 이순재, 오늘 새벽 별세‥향년 91세 2025. 연기 경력 70년을 자랑하는 이순재가 건강 악화로 출연 중이던 연극에서 하차하게 되었습니다. 원로 배우 이순재 전 국회의원이 별세했다. Net › memorial › leesoonjae영원한 현역 이순재, 91세로 별세.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.