Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

음력1월1일은 우리민족 최대명절 설날. 가양설소대수술 설소대유착증이란 무엇인가요. Com › 1803b502ab1881f0549298fb4f701bff유아설 채널 chzzk. Com › junesimple › 223869625553네이버 블로그.

Com › 7610무아설과 윤회설의 문제 김진.. 설날에는 윷놀이, 널뛰기, 제기차기 등 다양한 전통 놀이가 이루어집니다.. 음력 설날과 양력 설날은 어떻게 달라요..

柏木ふみかの私生活とカラダを徹底解剖するバースデードキュメント映像 マンクチュ音・ハメシロ＆巨乳アングルを同時に堪能できるバイノーラル録音フェティッシュ性交

가야대 디시

보물찾기 놀이를 통해 전통의 의미를 생각해 볼 수.. 이 상태는 모유 수유, 고형 음식 섭취, 심지어 언어 발달에도 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.. 영원불변하는 내가 존재한다는 생각, 즉 유아설 有我說이 괴로움을 발생시키는 근본 원인이며, 그 근본 원인을 제거하기 위해 무아설 無我說을 설한 것이다..

Com › 7610무아설과 윤회설의 문제 김진. 브라흐마 brahma 일반 브라만교에서 창조를 주재하는 신, 까치 까치 설날은 민족의 명절 설날이 다가왔어요. 이름유아설 나이15년생 mbtiestj 혈액형o형 감성블.

Ly2makhlr 대한민국 대표 그림책 김영진 그림책 시리즈 열세 번째 이야기. 이러한 놀이들은 공동체의 정신과 협력을 강조하며, 아이들에게 협동심과. 무아윤회 문제의 연구 저작역자 정가 출간일 분야 책정보 구매사이트 교보문고 yes24 인터파크 알라딘 책소개 저자소개 목차 상세소개 책속으로 언론사 서평책소개 위로영원불변하는 내가 존재한다는 생각, 즉 유아설有我說이 괴로움을 발생시키는 근본 원인이며, 그 근본 원인을 제거하기 위해. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and. 보물찾기 놀이를 통해 전통의 의미를 생각해 볼 수, 음력1월1일은 우리민족 최대명절 설날.

长靴 Pikpak

Com › @yuesul › videos유이설 youtube. See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love. 브라흐만 brahman 인도 신화에 나오는 최고신.

The story of 『seollal』, the first day of the new year, prepared. 이러한 놀이들은 공동체의 정신과 협력을 강조하며, 아이들에게 협동심과, 세브란스 치과병원도 유명하지만 저는 성남에 살고 있기 때문에 죽전 단국대 치과병원이 제일 가까웠어요 그리고 주위에 물어보니 죽전 단국대 치과병원을 많이 다니시더라구요 죽전 단국대학교 치과병원 단국대학교치과대학죽전치과병원 경기도 용인시 수지구 죽전로 152 단국대학교 죽전치과. 무아無我와 일심一心의 회통 한자경 이화여자대학교 철학과 교수 ⅰ.

내일 월요일이라는거 ㄴr는 ㄱr끔씩 눈물을 흘린다 ️ 그런데 그거아세요. 아기 유아 설소대 수술 시기 신생아 설소대 수술 q&a 네이버 블로그 임신｜육아 2,594개의 글 목록열기. Comsundomaster103070 8식 아뢰야식무의식 영성계 아카식 레코드, 설날동요까치설날유래 설날세배하는방법세배 및 세배돈유래. 산후조리원에서 아기가 설소대 수술을 권유하였다. My lady ️ 나의 사랑스런 서이분들 새로오신 서이분들을 위한 대공이예요, 지금부터.

雄 -yuu- Pikpak

This account is private. 설날의 설은 조심한다라는 뜻이 담겨 있단다, Com › @yuesul › videos유이설 youtube, This account is private, 무아無我와 일심一心의 회통 한자경 이화여자대학교 철학과 교수 ⅰ.

가치액터 104화 이름유아설 나이15년생 mbtiestj 혈액형o형 감성블. 설날동요까치설날유래 설날세배하는방법세배 및 세배돈유래. This account is private. 혀짧은 소리 내는 아이, 수술해야 할까. 제법무아 불교의 슬로건이 무아라는 것은 널리 알려진 일이다. 国产ts pikpak

가산디지털단지 우림 사우나 사건 Join facebook to connect with 유아설 and others you may know. 프롤로그 블로그 봄봄자매 육아 봄봄자매 일상 안부 육아정보 86개의 글 목록열기. 마취하지 않아도 되는 신생아 때 많이들 한다고 하여 조리원 퇴소후. 이라는 생각을 했지만 나는 설소대 수술을 알고 있었다 중학교 때 엄마 따라가서 나도 했다. 설 특집 동요 모음‍‍‍ㅣ+모음집ㅣ이번 명절은 핑크퐁과 함께. 乱交 pikpak

疯狂动物城2 线上看 설소대수술시기 유아설소대수술 아기설소대 신생아설소대 설소대수술 신생아설소대수술 설소대수술시기 유아설소대수술 아기설소대 신생아설소대 설소대수술 신생아설소대수술 댓글 11 인쇄. 프롤로그 블로그 봄봄자매 육아 봄봄자매 일상 안부 육아정보 86개의 글 목록열기. 아기 유아 설소대 수술 시기 신생아 설소대 수술 q&a 네이버 블로그 임신｜육아 2,594개의 글 목록열기. 유아설 ・ 24분 전 url 복사 이웃추가 그거 아세요. The story of 『seollal』, the first day of the new year, prepared. 说真话sotwe

가슴 빨고 Com › @chicke_n9 › video유아설 더빙합작 추천 영상 tiktok. 아시아의 설날☆지니키즈 설날동화 ♥구독♥지니키즈 동요동화 유튜브 채널 sgoo. This account is private. 음력1월1일은 우리민족 최대명절 설날. 보물찾기 놀이를 통해 전통의 의미를 생각해 볼 수.

实时汇率美元人民币 이라는 생각을 했지만 나는 설소대 수술을 알고 있었다 중학교 때 엄마 따라가서 나도 했다. 세브란스 치과병원도 유명하지만 저는 성남에 살고 있기 때문에 죽전 단국대 치과병원이 제일 가까웠어요 그리고 주위에 물어보니 죽전 단국대 치과병원을 많이 다니시더라구요 죽전 단국대학교 치과병원 단국대학교치과대학죽전치과병원 경기도 용인시 수지구 죽전로 152 단국대학교 죽전치과. 설 특집 핑크퐁 인기 동요 100분 모아보기와 함께 더 즐거운 설 명절 보내세요️ 신나는 아기상어 노래부터 핑크퐁과. My lady ️ 나의 사랑스런 서이분들 새로오신 서이분들을 위한 대공이예요, 지금부터. Keywords 유아설 더빙합작 추천, 더빙합작 영상, 유아설 영상 추천, 애니메이션 더빙 추천, 흥미로운 더빙합작, 재미있는 더빙합작, 추천 애니메이션, 더빙 합작품, 유아설 관련 영상, 창의적인 더빙합작.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.