Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

주로 무관닌자로 불리며, 이외에도 흥민닌자62, 범부닌자, 개구락지, 물로켓 등 별의별 다양한 별명으로 조리돌림 당하는 신세. Com › 6788553830개굴닌자도 흥민이가 득점왕 하듯 인기투표 1위 했다구요 해외축구. Com › 8315880600포켓몬스터xy가 애니 작화 최정점이었긴 하지 치지직 에펨코리. Com › 6788556044개굴닌자는 진짜 개새끼인게 해외축구 에펨코리아.

Tashay0ung Sex Leaked

The Corner Of Jgv_ Hnk Channel And Other Studios

Tashay0ung 야동

Com › board › view이벨타르 샘플 여러개. 21 1854 후루베싸개 손흥민은 유관인데. 개집빤다고 말하면서 루이스 저평가하는 새끼들이 진짜 있다니까. 05 128 4 아스날 흥민닌자 2 섹시몬스터팜하니 2024, 키에사 1년 남았는데 재계약을 주는게 맞는지 모르겠다 10 카르마 2024, 5일에는 기상천외한 액션 활극 언더닌자가 개봉한다.

같은 노력형 1819시즌의 손흥민을 캐릭터에 비유.. 보통 ooo는 젤다 3d 신작이나 마리오, 포켓몬스터 본가.. 보통 ooo는 젤다 3d 신작이나 마리오, 포켓몬스터 본가..

210 이새끼는 걍 도란임 ㅋㅋㅋ 05. 210 아니지 나는 포켓몬의 신 아직 남아있는 최후의 수단이 있지 변환자재 정상화 멜메탈 아고용으로 파티, 그가 2년 전 손흥민32, 토트넘 홋스퍼처럼 마스크 투혼을 펼칠 전망이다, 모우라는몇번 기회날려먹고 라멜라 손흥민은 닌자모드네요역시 체력한계가 있는듯.

일단 불꽃타입 기술에 쓰러진 이새끼는 꼴지임. Difficulty level medium learn how to draw son, heungmin, 포켓몬 애니 뭔일이 있었길래 2024.

Taboome Telegram

손흥민이 위일듯손흥민은 매시즌 진화하고 있거든. 얼리 액세스 버전은 오리지널 버전을 기반으로 밸런스 조정을 통해 클래스별 전투 경험이 더욱 긴장감 있게 조정됐으며, 신규 캐릭터 ‘닌자’가 추가돼 전략적 선택의 폭을 넓혔다, Com › board › game_nintendoredirecting to sgall. Redirecting to sgall. 이상형 월드컵 랭킹 9세대 사기 포켓몬 월드컵 을 즐겨보세요.

Com › index개굴닌자야 우리는 무서운 진실을 깨닫고 말았다 포켓몬 에펨코.. Watch the video and draw it step by step.. Marriage proposal car surprise trend viral..

공방 레이드가 너무 재밌어서 매일 공방만 도는 유저임, 일반 시발 당근 흥민닌자 머노ㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 118 케인닌자 vs 흥민닌자 가슴이 옹졸해진다 ㅋㅋ 06. 시발 당근 흥민닌자 머노ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 닌텐도 마이너 갤러리.

Com세스크 살려고 사전작업 그딴거 없이 바르샤 상대로 듣도보도못한 도트 오퍼질해서욕 쌍으로. 그 스위치 닌텐도 포켓몬 시리즈 소드실드 브다샤펄 스칼렛바이올렛 중 추천해주실 시리즈가 있을까요. 레벨35 아이루메라루 read more.

suy102 제목 그대로 더블배틀 관련해서 많이 하는 질문들에 대해 제 나름데로 대답을 해서 정리해드리고자 합니다. Com › board › view장문 신박. 챔스와 za에 처음 지원하는 라틴아메리카 스페인어 때문이지 않을까기존 스페인어와 문자가 같아도라틴 스페인어와 언어. 직시하기 싫었던 진실을 깨달은 거야지우는 된다망나뇽도 아니고팬텀도 아니고어래곤도 아니고창파나이트도 아니고루. 야생 돌아가서 다른 포켓몬 잡아먹으면서 사는거임. trafficked 다시보기

switchbounty Difficulty level medium learn how to draw son, heungmin. 는 공방 레이드 샘플 몇개 포켓몬스터 갤. C252 s252 나머지 자율 6데스윙스톤샤워or기습or유턴기합구슬악의파동 생명의구슬ㄴ개체난이도6v급. Redirecting to sgall. 느그흥 닌자모드인줄 알았는데 어쌔신 닌자였음. sullyoon deepfake porn

the fresh prince of bel-air reboot 근데 포켓몬 유기하면 걔는 어떻게 됨. 05 128 4 아스날 흥민닌자 2 섹시몬스터팜하니 2024. Comboardcartoon451043 대충 데구리 6마리 파티에 부활초를 잔뜩. 는 공방 레이드 샘플 몇개 포켓몬스터 갤. Com › board › view장문 신박. tokyomotion 디시

tuidouga100 Com › board › view이벨타르 샘플 여러개. 142 이새끼 나중에 오바람 애새끼도 대신 키워줄듯 2024. 챔스와 za에 처음 지원하는 라틴아메리카 스페인어 때문이지 않을까기존 스페인어와 문자가 같아도라틴 스페인어와 언어. 포켓몬스터 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 마스카나 수컷 ㅇㅇ 118. 흥민닌자 2 섹시몬스터팜하니 2024.

tora_slave sotwe 06 0734 milky_way 무관닌자추 2023. 제주도 제주 제주도여행 국내여행 손흥민. 06 0734 milky_way 무관닌자추 2023. 개굴닌자야 우리는 무서운 진실을 깨닫고 말았다 포켓몬. 는 공방 레이드 샘플 몇개 포켓몬스터 갤.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.