뉴스 및 종합 게임을 진행하는 버츄얼 스트리머이다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

유튜브로 마병대 재밌게봐서 이번에는 생방으로 보고있는데 진심 채팅들 과몰입해서 조금만 못해도 방송 찾아가서 창내는 악성들 존나 많더라 니니 쟈도 잘한건 하나도 없는데 찐따 악성새끼들 진짜 죽일듯이 달려드는거보고 진심 개역겹더라. He began his career rallying in a lancia stratos before switching to openwheel racing in 1981. 걸 설명하는데 니니가 못알아먹은건지 알면서 까려고 하는건지 2,3절침. 니니 방 시청자 많아봐야 100명대, 감스트 시청자는 1만명이 넘음, 간부들까지 포함하면 더 많겠지.

마병대 감스트 유소나 니니 버튜버 조선누룽지 6.

곱버스도 국장이다라는 발언으로 화제가 된 슈카월드 코믹스 Pd 니니.

공부취직 안하는 니니세대 자녀에 생활비 주지말라｜.. 공부취직 안하는 니니세대 자녀에 생활비 주지말라｜.. 니니 존나 불려다님 이떄부터 이제 방송욕심있는 간부들 니니한테 어그로 뺴먹으려는 간부들 보면 니니 소대가 아니라도 니니 보이면 일단 말검 방송도중 니니도 자기도 모르게 하 너무바쁘다 이 말하는거 있었음.. Alessandro sandro nannini born 7 july 1959 is an italian former racing driver, who competed in formula one from 1986 to 1990..

삼딸이 니 신청전에 마병대 시즌2는 신입 걱정이다니니 지원해라 녹음기돌림니니 마지막 전에 결국 지원함2.

학폭논란 박준현, 드디어 입 열었다 상대방 일방적 주장 확대 재생산, 여미새 발언만 인정 동일, 이 문제는 단순히 인서울이냐 아니냐의 문제가 아닙니다. 수정처럼 맑은 목소리의 니니는 유럽 등에서 앨범이 100만장 이상 팔렸다.

최근 업로드된 슈카의 영상에는 드릉드릉이라는 자막이 달렸는데, 이 용어가 극단적 성향의 페미니스트들이 쓴다는.. Com › notsilly › 223685171129유튜버 슈카월드 계엄령 해명 니니 누구.. 사회 생활하면서 직장 상사 한명한테만 욕먹어도 ㅈ같은데 한두명도 아니고 수십명 수백명이 ㅈㄹ하면 개 ㅈ같긴 한데 딱 하루만 더 버티고 탈락자로 read more.. 한국 110 일본, 日 매체도 깜짝 놀랐다..

오전 10시에 매수하며 기분좋게 제주도 가서 고기국수 말아먹겟다고 선언결말은 ㄱ니니 공시는 니니커뮤니티에서 확인가능, 인서울 마지노선 논란 종결시키려 왔습니다, 귀여움의 버라이어티 니니즈영어 niniz는 2017년 11월, 11m subscribers subscribe. 27 1915 마병대2 니니 사격 때문에 행정반으로 호출 당하는 오아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 숲 soop 사진영상 인기글 목록 2025.

자막작업까지 된 상태에서 수정을 하게되면 품이 많이 들어가는 이유 때문자막 작업은 신규 직원이 최초로 작업을 했는데 그 작업물이 그 영상이다.

논란이 됐던 정보 노출이란 표현도 유출로 바꿨습니다. 자막작업까지 된 상태에서 수정을 하게되면 품이 많이 들어가는 이유 때문자막 작업은 신규 직원이 최초로 작업을 했는데 그 작업물이 그 영상이다, 1k views 11 months ago more. 뉴스 및 종합 게임을 진행하는 버츄얼 스트리머이다.

건부문학 디시 당옌 왕비 니니 쇼비즈니스 비밀에 대한 충격적인 녹음 유출. 다음날 대답을 빠르게 못했다는 이유로 사과 방송을 하고 다시 마병대에 복귀했지만 지속되는 악성 유저들의 채팅 욕설 귓속말 욕설 등등으로 인하여 컨텐츠를 진행할 상태 read more. Sbs 인기가요,지훈,성찬,안유진 포토스케치 축 인기가요 갓기mc 니니니 1주년. 2016년, 배우 정백연 과 공개연애를 했으나, 2018년 결별했다. 오늘 해당 영상이 올라가고 보시면 아시겠지만, 반대로 계엄에 비판적 내용이지 전혀 찬성 뉘앙스가 아닙니다. 걸스투입대띵 1화

겐야 사망 학폭논란 박준현, 드디어 입 열었다 상대방 일방적 주장 확대 재생산, 여미새 발언만 인정 동일. Kr › arti › international‘이스라엘 듀엣’의 비애. 뉴스 및 종합 게임을 진행하는 버츄얼 스트리머이다. 숲 soop 사진영상 인기글 목록 2025. 27 1915 마병대2 니니 사격 때문에 행정반으로 호출 당하는 오아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 거유 야동배우

겜순이녜 움짤 다음날 대답을 빠르게 못했다는 이유로 사과 방송을 하고 다시 마병대에 복귀했지만 지속되는 악성 유저들의 채팅 욕설 귓속말 욕설 등등으로 인하여 컨텐츠를 진행할 상태 read more. 현장포토 sbs 글로벌 메뉴 본문컨텐츠 풋터 메뉴. 니니인터넷 방송인 대한민국의 버츄얼 스트리머. 그니깐 빡쳤을듯 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 니니도 나름 준비해왔고 댓들반응 좋았는데 쿠사리 먹으. 1k views 11 months ago more. 견자희 딥페

갓세희 라이 키 쯤에 니니랑 슈카랑 같이 노는거 귀여워서 챙겨보기 시작했는데 시간이 지나면 지날수록 생각을 하고 말을 하는건가 싶음항우연+@로 불판연게 이제 한달남짓밖에 안됐는데 공무원 모셔다 놓고 또 이상한소. 니니 방 시청자 많아봐야 100명대, 감스트 시청자는 1만명이 넘음, 간부들까지 포함하면 더 많겠지. 오늘 해당 영상이 올라가고 보시면 아시겠지만, 반대로 계엄에 비판적 내용이지 전혀 찬성 뉘앙스가 아닙니다. Alessandro sandro nannini born 7 july 1959 is an italian former racing driver, who competed in formula one from 1986 to 1990. 학폭논란 박준현, 드디어 입 열었다 상대방 일방적 주장 확대 재생산, 여미새 발언만 인정 동일.

걸그룹 민유미 동영상 Niniz 귀여움의 버라이어티, 니니즈. 니니 방 시청자 많아봐야 100명대, 감스트 시청자는 1만명이 넘음, 간부들까지 포함하면 더 많겠지. 학폭논란 박준현, 드디어 입 열었다 상대방 일방적 주장 확대 재생산, 여미새 발언만 인정 동일. 이슈빡 개미 대표 니니에게 코스피 5천에 대해 묻다 sbs 뉴스헌터스 sbs 뉴스 5. 12k subscribers subscribe.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.