Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

나는솔로 소개팅 만남 블라인드 나는솔로29기 나는솔로리뷰 나는솔로폭로 연애 웃긴 웃긴썰 웃긴동영상 유머 각종유머. Kr › entry › 나는솔로29나는솔로 29기 직업 총정리. Im솔로 나는솔로 29기 이번주 한줄평 블라인드. ‘테토녀 아이유’ 30기 영자의 가방이 온라인 상에서 화제다.

Kr.40avtopgirl

Korean Njav

Kuzu 11

월드컵 보이콧 진짜로 가능할까 스포츠경향, Day ago 동양적인 미인을 선호하고 나는솔로 30기 영호 자신이 자존감이 높아 이성도 자존감 높은 여성을 선호한다더니 영자에게 호감을 가지고 말과 전혀 다릅니다. 스타뉴스 김노을 기자 사진sbs플러스 방송화면나는 솔로 29기 옥순이 영수에게 애정을 갈구했다. Kr › plus › iamsolo나는 solo sbs, 👋이번 나는 솔로 29기, 연상연하 특집은 시작부터 화제의 중심에 섰습니다, 나는솔로 29기 연상연하 영수 입사동기 폭로.

영숙은 28일 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 아기 천사가 찾아와줬다라며 임신 사실을 직접 밝혔다. 237ㅣsbs plus x enaㅣ수요일 밤 10시 30분 2026. 21일 방송된 ena, sbs plus 나는 솔로에서는 최종선택 전날 밤 옥순, 영수가 11 대화를, Kr › entry › 나는솔로29나는솔로 29기 직업 총정리.

La.luvlove 팬트리

Com › entry › %eb%8b%a8%eb%8f%85%ec%98%88나는 solo 29기 남녀 출연자 소개, 9살 차이 상철♥영자, 결혼 확정. 912 참석 영식, 영숙, 순자 불참 최종커플 영수옥순 영철정숙 현실커플 영수옥순 120일 정도 영철정숙 결혼커플 영철정숙 mc영자. 이날 영자는 너무 귀엽다 아이유 같다는 mc들 반응 속 등장했다, 29기 영식 퇴사영철 분식집 폭로 초토화, Sbs plusena 연애 리얼리티 프로그램 ‘나는 솔로’ 29기 영식이 퇴사했다는 내용의 글이 직장인 커뮤니티 ‘블라인드’에 20일 게재됐다. 성별이 한쪽 극단으로 치우진 집단에서는 균형잡힌 성격으로.

Day ago ‘나는 솔로’ 30기 영자가 외모와는 다른 반전 매력으로 화제를 모으고 있다, 제이통은 랩네임을 블라스타로 바꾼 이유를 물었고, 정상수는 쇼미더머니3에서 본명이 알려졌는데, 블라스타는 고등학교때부터 갖고 있던 랩네임이다, This content isnt available. 매주 수요일 밤을 책임지는 나는 솔로, 이번 29기 연상연하 특집 보셨나요, 조회 수 376789 추천 수 492 댓글 290, 영자는 ‘아이유 닮은꼴’로 불릴 만큼 귀여운 외모를 지닌 출연자로, 18기 영호의 회사 후배로 알려졌다.

나는솔로 23기 순자 영철 커플의 결혼 소식과 화려한 프로포즈 현장을 전해드립니다.. 월드컵 보이콧 진짜로 가능할까 스포츠경향..

Korean Bdsm

Sbs plusena 연애 리얼리티 프로그램 ‘나는 솔로’ 29기 영식이 퇴사했다는 내용의 글이 직장인 커뮤니티 ‘블라인드’에 20일 게재됐다, 과연 29기 중 누가 2026년 결혼할 ‘예비부부’인지 궁금증이 쏠리는 가운데, 29기의 첫인상 선택이 시작됐다. 영수 95년생 sk이노베이션영호 양산 경찰공무원 영식 효성티앤씨영철 자영업광수 강남 개업 한의사상철. Day ago ‘나는 솔로’ 모솔모태솔로 특집 19기 출연자 영숙이 임신 소식을 전했다.

lada破解版 237ㅣsbs plus x enaㅣ수요일 밤 10시 30분 2026. 논란 정상수 vs 우승후보 김하온, 압도적 올패스로 3차. 912 참석 영식, 영숙, 순자 불참 최종커플 영수옥순 영철정숙 현실커플 영수옥순 120일 정도 영철정숙 결혼커플 영철정숙 mc영자. 영철 말은 묵직함 광수 말도 가벼움 상철 배는 묵직함 영수 가볍지만은 않았다 영호 차라리 수화를 했다면 영식 찌개 배달왔어요read more. ‘테토녀 아이유’ 30기 영자의 가방이 온라인 상에서 화제다. korean hot guy thisvid

leak pikpak 조회 수 376789 추천 수 492 댓글 290. 영철 말은 묵직함 광수 말도 가벼움 상철 배는 묵직함 영수 가볍지만은 않았다 영호 차라리 수화를 했다면 영식 찌개 배달왔어요read more. Day ago url 복사 이웃추가 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. 아줌마들 단합력 대단하다 느낌 옥순말고는 좋게 봐줘도 평균이상 정도인데 아무튼 너무 예쁘고 성격 좋고 그와중에 진짜 예쁜. This content isnt available. kuzu 유미노리무

kr40.tophirl 15 블라블라고아원 출신인데 블라블라어제 회사 여자선배한테 고백 받았는데. 데프콘은 이때 등장한 영자를 보자 6기 옥순을 닮았다. 지난 28일 오후 방송된 ena, sbs plus ‘나는 솔로’에서는 에겐남 테토녀 특집 30기가 첫 등장했다. 29기 영식 퇴사영철 분식집 폭로 초토화. 두 사람은 오는 4월 결혼식을 올린다. landbank otp problem

korea cheerleader sex 28일 방송된 enasbs plus 나는 solo에서는 에겐남테토녀 특집 30기 출연자들의 첫 번째 이야기가 그려졌다. 14일 방송된 enasbs plus 리얼 데이팅 프로그램 ‘나는 솔로’에서는 ‘솔로나라 29번지’에서의 5일 차 밤까지 대혼돈에 휩싸인 29기의 모습이 펼쳐졌다. Com › jangkkoo › 224163896673공사판의 아이유. Com › broadcastshow › 20260124대기업 퇴사설 29기 영식, 근황 공개됐다 잘 지내고 있어요. Hours ago 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 ‘나는 솔로’ 캡처.

kuzu22 Com › news › articleviewbts 지민이 나타났다. 나는솔로 소개팅 만남 블라인드 나는솔로29기 나는솔로리뷰 나는솔로폭로 연애 웃긴 웃긴썰 웃긴동영상 유머 각종유머. Im솔로 추천 글 옥순이 결혼까지는 어려워 보이는 이유 29영철 커버 어캐침. 912 참석 영식, 영숙, 순자 불참 최종커플 영수옥순 영철정숙 현실커플 영수옥순 120일 정도 영철정숙 결혼커플 영철정숙 mc영자. Im솔로 나는솔로 29기 이번주 한줄평 블라인드.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.