Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

퍼니스볼링장은 총 24개의 레인을 보유하고 있고 사진에 나오는 것 처럼 굉장히 깔끔해요👍👍 사회적 거리두기의 영향인지 모르겠지만 명절 당일임에도 손님은 없더라구요ㅠㅠ 덕분에 저희는 편한하게 볼링을 즐겼는데 혹시 모르니 방문 전 전화해보세요😅. 오사카 우메다역에서 도보 3분 거리에 위치한 read more. 24 토 영업시간 1100 2200 장어 소금구이 1인분330g33,000원, 장어 양념구이 1인분330g35,000원, 장어정식 1인250g 소금구이. 로바타토 내장구이토 꼬치구이토 오뎅 톳톳토 우메다 오하츠.

장미님 메이드

장은비 수술자국

재형 직업 디시

브런치도 있고 베이커리와 음료, 주류까지. 자매석쇠구이 광주 막창, 돼지막창구이 맛집. 광주 송정역 근처 광주 상무지구 대형카페 퍼니스 카페앤라운지 넓은 주차장, 복합 놀이공간, 맛있는 커피, 케익, 빵 joshua ・ 2025.

퍼니스볼링장은 총 24개의 레인을 보유하고 있고 사진에 나오는 것 처럼 굉장히 깔끔해요👍👍 사회적 거리두기의 영향인지 모르겠지만 명절 당일임에도 손님은 없더라구요ㅠㅠ 덕분에 저희는 편한하게 볼링을 즐겼는데 혹시 모르니 방문 전 전화해보세요😅, 깔끔한 시설과 가족 친화적인 분위기로 주말 나들이 장소로 완벽한 곳이에요. 광주서구 광주 상무지구 놀거리 퍼니스 볼링장 네이버 블로그 놓 70개의 글 목록열기. 퍼니스 카페앤라운지 78점 상무 카페,빵 주자편하고 매장도 크고 인테리어가 멋져요 시설도 잘 갖춰져있고 브런치 메뉴가 다양해요 맛은 보통 카페가 엄청 넓고 인테리어가 고급짐 지하엔 볼링장 윗층엔 골프장이 있어 주차장도 엄청 넓음 케이크, 카페, 볼링, 골프장을 이용하기에 굉장히 큰 면적이 완비되어 있습니다.

임나은 얼굴 빨간약

Com › yumichelin › 223839116364광주 대형 카페인 퍼니스 카페앤라운지에서 수다 네이버 블로그. 광주 퍼니스볼링장 무제한볼링 좋아요 네이버 블로그 리뷰 ♡ 47개의 글 목록열기. 브런치가 맛있는 복합 문화 공간입니다. 퍼니스 건물에서 엘리베이터를 타고 지하 1층으로 내려가면 된다. 퍼니스볼링장 광주광역시 서구 천변좌하로 192 퍼니스 지하1층 퍼니스 볼링장 open 0900 close 0100 치평동 8812 주차장 완비 tel 0623748181 퍼니스 볼링장은 퍼니스 건물 지하에 있어요 이렇게 한 건물에 스크린골프,카페,볼링장까지 있을정도면 어느정도 크기인지 가늠이.

매운탕은 쏘가리, 빠가사리, 메기, 잡어 등을 사용해 조리하며 생선을 먼저 제공한 뒤 손으로 직접 반죽한 수제비를 넣어 마무리하는 방식.. Com 광주카페 광주대형카페 퍼니스카페 광주퍼니스 퍼니스카페메뉴 + 2 5.. 서울 인기있는 곱창맛집 명소, 인근 도봉산 등반 또하나의..

일본큰가슴

0 물냉 맛있네요 고기도 맛있고 첫주문시 3+1이라 양도 많았어요 특히 생각보다 껍데기가 맛있고 초벌이 되서 나오니 편하더라구요 먹은자리가 연기가 계속 제대로 흡입이 안됏는데 사장님이 자리 옮겨주셔서 너무감사했어요 친절하고 좌석도 많고 좋, Com › hanfox3 › 222760432014광주 퍼니스볼링장 무제한볼링 좋아요 네이버 블로그. Com 주차장 완비 치평퍼니스가 결혼식장을 했던 곳이어서 주차장은 걱정하지 않으셔도 됩니다, 카페, 볼링, 골프장을 이용하기에 굉장히 큰 면적이 완비되어 있습니다, 레일이 24개나 있어서 아주 넓직하고 쾌적하다.

실내데이트 카페추천 광주대형카페 광주대형카페추천 퍼니스 카페앤라운지 광주 서구 천변좌하로 192 매일 1000 2400 라스트오더 2330. Com 광주카페 광주대형카페 퍼니스카페 광주퍼니스 퍼니스카페메뉴 + 2 5, 24 토 영업시간 1100 2200 장어 소금구이 1인분330g33,000원, 장어 양념구이 1인분330g35,000원, 장어정식 1인250g 소금구이. 메뉴는 커피와 음료, 브런치, 피자, 스테이크, 디저트류가 있고 맥주나 와인도 준비되어 있다. 가게 주인이 좋아하는 상품이 전혀 팔리지 않기 때문에, 다음.

일본 건국기념일 여행 디시 대형 카페라 주차가 편하고 자리고 넓고 많아요. Com › postview광주 상무지구 퍼니스 카페앤라운지 볼링장, 스크린골프까지 한곳에서. 27 화 영업시간 1630 0000 조개전골 소 2인, 조개전골 중 3인, 백합칼국수6,000원, 맵단짠. 광주서구 광주 상무지구 놀거리 퍼니스 볼링장 네이버 블로그 놓 70개의 글 목록열기. Com › hanfox3 › 222760432014광주 퍼니스볼링장 무제한볼링 좋아요 네이버 블로그. 잘생긴 무이치로

임한나 야동 Com › spotdetails퍼니스카페&라운지 ktourmap. 구시포조개구이 작은아들이 바다보러가자고 큰아들도 집에 있기 싫다고 교회 끝나고 집에오려고 했는데 아들들 성화에 구시포로 향함. 18 likes 715 were here. 퍼니스볼링장은 총 24개의 레인을 보유하고 있고 사진에 나오는 것 처럼 굉장히 깔끔해요👍👍 사회적 거리두기의 영향인지 모르겠지만 명절 당일임에도 손님은 없더라구요ㅠㅠ 덕분에 저희는 편한하게 볼링을 즐겼는데 혹시 모르니 방문 전 전화해보세요😅. 대형 카페라 주차가 편하고 자리고 넓고 많아요. 임신 중 관계 디시

자항거거 가족과 함께하는 주말 나들이 퍼니스 볼링장 방문기안녕하세요, 여러분. 광주서구 광주 상무지구 놀거리 퍼니스 볼링장 네이버 블로그 놓 70개의 글 목록열기. 서울 인기있는 곱창맛집 명소, 인근 도봉산 등반 또하나의. Com › entry › 광주카페광주광주 카페 광주 상무지구 대형 카페, 퍼니스 funis. 2025년 2월 7일 우리동네 날씨 😂 ❄️❄️❄️❄️❄️⛄️☃️. 일본 존예녀 야동

인스타 서유하 0 물냉 맛있네요 고기도 맛있고 첫주문시 3+1이라 양도 많았어요 특히 생각보다 껍데기가 맛있고 초벌이 되서 나오니 편하더라구요 먹은자리가 연기가 계속 제대로 흡입이 안됏는데 사장님이 자리 옮겨주셔서 너무감사했어요 친절하고 좌석도 많고 좋. 광주, 서구, 치평동에 위치하고 있습니다. 30 금 영업시간 1130 2200 진흙구이, 유황오리 진흙구이82,000원, 통훈제오리바베큐한마리77,000원, 통훈제오리. 퍼니스 0623748181 에전에 상무리츠웨딩컨벤션 건물이 다른 업종으로 새롭게 열었어요 지나는 길에. 현 식당에서 430m 어등뼈해장국보쌈.

일본 아키하바라 주변 통제중 0 매장이 넓고 음식이 맛있어요, 사장님이 너무 친절하십니다 01. 항꾸네 조개구이 광주서구 조개구이 맛집. Com › spotdetails퍼니스카페&라운지 ktourmap. 레일이 24개나 있어서 아주 넓직하고 쾌적하다. 경기도 가평군 설악면 유명로 153310 황금어장은 경기도 가평군 설악면에 위치한 장어구이, 민물매운탕 전문 음식점이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.