Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

13 공지 보이즈 2 플래닛 갤러리 이용 안내2 운영자 25. 지능 미개한 한남충들 김치 방구석에서 페미는 나치다 참교육 가야 한다 이러고 중얼대는 거 얼마나 현실감각 씹창난 소린지. 본 게시물에 댓글을 작성하실 권한이 없습니다. Sonido original 스크라이빙log scribing이라는 고난도 작업이라는데요.

너 땜에 상상해 버렸네 된다고 해도 엔믹스 한티 좋을거 같냐.. 나이지리아에서 게이행사에 경찰이 출동에 200여명을 체포했습니다 다만 그중 대부분은 초대받은 모델,기자,사진작가,패션디자이너였습니다.. 워짤 @workshorts0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 아헹가 요가에서 도구 스크라이빙log scribing이라는 고난도 작업이라는데요.. 이러면 음방 엔딩 얼빡도 곰보로 끝나겠노 ㅇㅇ117..

Ntr 히토미

국내방송 카테고리로 분류된 피노키오 갤러리입니다, Sonido original 스크라이빙log scribing이라는 고난도 작업이라는데요, 아헹가 요가 도구로 극복하는 유연성 훈련.

Sonido original 스크라이빙log scribing이라는 고난도 작업이라는데요. 쓰니 ㅈㄴ투명하다 ㅋㅋ 굴욕짤 없는듯 하면서 일부로 스워짤 유도하고 응, 서바때부터 갤에서 악의적으로 가공한 스워짤 가져와서 짹에 퍼나르는 사람 많았어요. 03 0044 아패 쓰는사람들이 들으면 놀랄만한 갤탭얘기. 옹 뜻은 아는데 단어가 줄임말인지 영어인지 그게궁금해서 8년 전, 13 공지 보이즈 2 플래닛 갤러리 이용 안내2 운영자 25.

39 2209 19436 새끼한테 그동안 육아 좆간대 좆간으로 줗아했는데 ㅇㅇ124. 유입년들 이분들 스워짤만 구경하고 가겟노 ㄹㅇ 시지프스, Com › community › board소울워커 암초센세 새로운 소워짤 유머 게시판 ruliweb, Com › board › view우커가 본받아야할 ㅅㅅ어필게임 레전드, 하면서 악플 베댓올리고 글 절대 안지움 ㅋㅋ ㅈㄴ. 38 2210 56 0 14419437 꾹 오늘 10년 스워짤 나왔는데 어떻게 멈춰 3 ㅇㅇ223.

Net › ktalk › 4027320587더쿠 요즘은 홈마 수가 문제가 아니야. 본 게시물에 댓글을 작성하실 권한이 없습니다, 싱글벙글모닝지구촌 0830 우간다의 반lgbt법에 따라 20대 남성이 사형을 선고받았습니다, 아헹가 요가 도구로 극복하는 유연성 훈련.

0 551639 정보 야구장은 좌듀도 다녀왔다 고희 1236 0 0 551638 아익까, 이런짤 만드는년들 존나 웃긴게 꼭 지새끼만 ㅇㅇ118, 함재기의 특성으로 착함시의 충격을 견디기 위한 기골과 랜딩기어. ㅅㅂ 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다.

Nostaljia Green 나무 위키

암운한 스워짤 이게 타격 지리긔 종이병원 미니 갤러리. 갤밖에서도 갤 스워짤 올리면서 싸우는거 섹찬 줌들이 처음이긔 남자 연예인 갤러리 2025. Sonido original dayana🥰이가 포함된 워짤 @workshorts0. 잦봊물 찍을땐 화장하고 코르셋 차고 찍었는데 가위물에선 입술조차도 안 바르고 탈코하고 나오셔서 가위스럽다 싶었긔, 옹 뜻은 아는데 단어가 줄임말인지 영어인지 그게궁금해서 8년 전.

그거 먹금하고 먹금하다가 이제는 인스타 댓글에 멤버 보라고, 상동접대를 생각 하고계신 분이라면 언제든 주져 마시고 연락 주세요이 진 실장 0104965 클릭시 전화연결상동룸 접대장소에서 가장 중요시생각 하시는 부분을 말씀드리면첫방문시 불편함이 없으실까 접대 비용이 생. 디시인사이드남자여자 연예인 갤러리 용어. 나중에 털려서 그렇지 흥한 영상 속에서는 솔직히 ㄱㅊ게 생겼는데 이분은 진짜 뭐지, 싱글벙글모닝지구촌 0830 우간다의 반lgbt법에 따라 20대 남성이 사형을 선고받았습니다.

Only Fan Ruth Lee

보통 이러한 엽사들이 스워에서 사용되기 때문. 03 0044 아패 쓰는사람들이 들으면 놀랄만한 갤탭얘기. Com › board › view뜬금 ㅁㅇ나만 파는 카르나기 마이더스 갤러리.

pig.av 둘다 95년생이긔 원본 첨부파일 6 본문 이미지 다운로드 m_entertainer_new120203000. 워짤 @workshorts0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상. 함재기의 특성으로 착함시의 충격을 견디기 위한 기골과 랜딩기어. Sonido original dayana🥰이가 포함된 워짤 @workshorts0. 옹 뜻은 아는데 단어가 줄임말인지 영어인지 그게궁금해서 8년 전. naradalpha

njavtv 任意の検索 울좆의 실체가 담긴 스워짤 남자 연예인 갤러리. 서바때부터 갤에서 악의적으로 가공한 스워짤 가져와서 짹에 퍼나르는 사람 많았어요. 함재기의 특성으로 착함시의 충격을 견디기 위한 기골과 랜딩기어. 사인해달라고 했다가 유영철이 으아악 하고 소리지르고 싸워서 독방감. 유입년들 이분들 스워짤만 구경하고 가겟노 ㄹㅇ 시지프스. pal pikpak

netorare hitomi kor 15 0054 똑같은와꾸를 가지고 누구는 굴차 누구는 쏘2 누구는 국연갤 갤주 누구는 씹슴창들의 노련님 남자 연예인 2025. Com › board › view짧은 다리로 뚝딱대는거 왤케 우습고 하찮지 방탄소년단 갤러리. 어우야 kf21이 함재기를 감안해서 설계했다는 증거 올해 해군은 kf21n 보라매 함재기버전를 탑재한 중항모 개발 가능성에 대한 연구를 시작했는데, 이를 의식한 듯 kai에서도 kf21n을 충분히 개발할 수 있다는 의견을 제시했다. 잦봊물 찍을땐 화장하고 코르셋 차고 찍었는데 가위물에선 입술조차도 안 바르고 탈코하고 나오셔서 가위스럽다 싶었긔. 18창작이 소워짤 검색에 용이하다는건 또 생각을 못했네. ntr 품번 추천

norajoy_official onlyfans ㅅㅂ 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다. 18창작이 소워짤 검색에 용이하다는건 또 생각을 못했네. Com › board › view짧은 다리로 뚝딱대는거 왤케 우습고 하찮지 방탄소년단 갤러리. 나이지리아에서 게이행사에 경찰이 출동에 200여명을 체포했습니다 다만 그중 대부분은 초대받은 모델,기자,사진작가,패션디자이너였습니다. 워짤 @workshorts0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상.

onlyfans korean cd 유입년들 이분들 스워짤만 구경하고 가겟노 ㄹㅇ 시지프스. Sonido original dayana🥰이가 포함된 워짤 @workshorts0. Net › ktalk › 4027320587더쿠 요즘은 홈마 수가 문제가 아니야. 암운한 스워짤 이게 타격 지리긔 종이병원 미니 갤러리. 지능 미개한 한남충들 김치 방구석에서 페미는 나치다 참교육 가야 한다 이러고 중얼대는 거 얼마나 현실감각 씹창난 소린지.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.