Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

넌나의가족 안산애견유치원 본오동애견유치원. 테살리아 지방의 도시국가 페라이의 왕으로, 페레스와 페리클뤼메네의 아들이자 파트로클로스의 어머니 페리오피스와 남매지간이다. 남자단식 조건엽성남시청세계랭킹 84위, 여자단식 이소율삼성생명세계랭킹 94위, 김주은김천시청세계랭킹 97위이 나란히 예선에서 탈락하며 눈물 read more. Gif a1ec34af25024f509c7f92db33e5a93e.

임산부av

자지 만지기

2k views streamed 3 months ago more read more.. 짤줍 76aebdc948b1483fa1827146d1ad449d.. Gif 1d21f31859ce4be0901874f0ac479b0b..

잘못된 연애방식 만화 9

표지 여주가 왜케 거적때기를 입고 있나 했는데 다 이유가 있었음, Gif a1ec34af25024f509c7f92db33e5a93e, 그리고 서두르지 말고 부드럽게 충분히 애무를 해줍니다, 클리커 rpg 장르에 미연시 테마와 웃픈 컨셉 코드가 결합된 내일은 연애왕은. 안세영은 12일이하 한국시간 말레이시아.

잠 못 이루게 하는 얀 데레 여자 친구 32

아버지 아가멤논 왕을 극진히 사랑했던 큰딸 엘렉트라는 이 광경을 목격하고 큰 충격에 빠져 복수의 강박관념을 정신병자처럼 간직하고 산다, 액서 리스타 대 월드 크로스의 경기 read more, 왕클리녀jpg 201910202110 만화 갤러리.

좋아요 41개,jourrnyy @jourrnyy 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 텅장이 된 이유와 재테크로 극복하는 방법을 알아보세요. 스포츠한국 이정철 기자 셔틀콕 여제 안세영23이 새해 첫 출전한 국제대회에서 우승을 차지했다. Com › jk2868 › statusx, 넌나의가족 안산애견유치원 본오동애견유치원.

에스퀼리르 왕국을 지키는 세 가문이 있음. 키보드 크리에이터가 준 키보드 생각보다 더 짱귀ㅠ 씽크웨이 곰돌찡이랑토끼찡 귀여운키보드 데스크테리어 저소음키보드 @승업키보드, 김랑랑 님께서 네이버페이 1만원 교환권에 당첨되셨습니다.

내 여친이 된장녀 일리 없어, 땅콩전쟁과 같은 독특한 컨셉의 모바일 게임을 개발한 마이크로스타트업 아이봉크리에이티브에서 2015년 신작 내일은 연애왕을 출시했다. 그리스 로마 신화의 등장인물 및 영웅, 공주, 마법사. 모라노1 님께서 cu 모바일상품권 1만원권에 당첨되셨습니다. 로도스의 아폴로니오스의 《아르고나우티카》의 등장인물이자 에우리피데스의 비극 《메데이아》의. 스마트한 금융 관리로 경제적 자유를 꿈꾸세요.

Net › tags › 왕클리녀왕클리녀の人気イラストやマンガ pixiv. 위에 모습은 사실 화장이며, 일부 영상에서 그녀의 맨얼굴을 볼 수 있는데, 위에 사진과는 다르게 안경을 안 쓴 병맛교수와 비슷하게 못생긴 모습이다, 참고로 두근두근 이두근 헬스장의 관장인 이두근이 여동이의 광팬이다. 표지 여주가 왜케 거적때기를 입고 있나 했는데 다 이유가 있었음.

잔델 얼굴 그리고 서두르지 말고 부드럽게 충분히 애무를 해줍니다. Net › tags › 왕클리녀왕클리녀の人気イラストやマンガ pixiv. 그리스 로마 신화의 등장인물 및 영웅, 공주, 마법사. 왕클리녀jpg 201910202110 만화 갤러리. 상대팀의 공세는 가볍게 제압 골때녀 최강자 박하얀의 선제골. 장은비 움짤 디시

자지보여주기 김랑랑 님께서 네이버페이 1만원 교환권에 당첨되셨습니다. 모라노1 님께서 cu 모바일상품권 1만원권에 당첨되셨습니다. Com › jk2868 › statusx. 그리고 서두르지 말고 부드럽게 충분히 애무를 해줍니다. 살아남은 왕녀의 웃음 뒤에는 아미드 여 미에사 에스퀼리르 백치왕녀. 인스타 gif 디시

인외뒷담2 Net › tags › 왕클리녀왕클리녀の人気イラストやマンガ pixiv. 상대팀의 공세는 가볍게 제압 골때녀 최강자 박하얀의 선제골. 에스퀼리르 왕국을 지키는 세 가문이 있음. Tiktok에서 구례군 두쫀쿠 관련 동영상을 찾아보세요. 먼저 편안한 마음으로 여성에게 안마 등 전신마사지로 근육을 풀어줍니다. 일진녀 길들이기 디시

인스 타 하요이과거 그리고 서두르지 말고 부드럽게 충분히 애무를 해줍니다. 에스퀼리르 왕국을 지키는 세 가문이 있음. Com › indexㅇㅎ남자 성기 점수표 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 여동이는 처음에는 말을 안했는데 어느순간부터 갑자기 말을하기 시작했다. 표지 여주가 왜케 거적때기를 입고 있나 했는데 다 이유가 있었음.

인스 타 뭐하냐 얼굴 디시 모라노1 님께서 cu 모바일상품권 1만원권에 당첨되셨습니다. 참고로 두근두근 이두근 헬스장의 관장인 이두근이 여동이의 광팬이다. 그리스 로마 신화의 등장인물 및 영웅, 공주, 마법사. 에스퀼리르 왕국을 지키는 세 가문이 있음. 그리고 서두르지 말고 부드럽게 충분히 애무를 해줍니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.