Tv건 뭐건 어떤매체에서도 본일이 없는데 이런사진은 꾸준히 올라오는거보면 뭘 하긴 read more.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

개그맨 출신 유튜버로 활동 중인 맹승지가 소셜미디어sns를 통해 1회 만남에 5억원을 줄 수 있다는 스폰서 제의 메시지를 받았다고 주장했다. 맹승지는 2013년 mbc 20기 공채 코미디언으로 데뷔하여 코미디언이자 연극배우로서의 길을 걷고 있다. 맹승지 외에도 방귀대장 뿡뿡이 의 4대 짜잔형 안재민과 배우 김성은 도 출연했다. 지난 22일 맹승지가 자신의 sns에 작년에 62kg이었는데 지금은 52kg 돼버림이라는 글과 함께 바디프로필 촬영 중인 모습을 공개했다.

발이 그렇게 섹시할 수 있는지 알트 디시 맨유, 유로파 결승전 제한맨 호소.

877 likes, 41 comments maengseungzi on janu 2024년 더없이 행복 했어요 모두 감사합니다 happy new year.. 04 215933 조회 6735 추천 171 댓글 9 방송내내 하는 짓거리들도 그렇고 이 븅신같은 걸음걸이가 정신이 멀쩡한 사람의 걸음걸이냐.. 막 그렇게 예쁘다 이건 아닌데 엄청 매력적으로 생겨서 그냥 예쁜것보다 오히려 더 끌리는 상ㅋㅋ 몸매도 몸매인건데 얼굴도 뭔가 끌리게 read more..

막 그렇게 예쁘다 이건 아닌데 엄청 매력적으로 생겨서 그냥 예쁜것보다 오히려 더 끌리는 상ㅋㅋ 몸매도 몸매인건데 얼굴도 뭔가 끌리게 Read More.

개그우먼 출신 방송인 맹승지가 몸매를 도용 당했다고 알렸다. Tv건 뭐건 어떤매체에서도 본일이 없는데 이런사진은 꾸준히 올라오는거보면 뭘 하긴 read more, Com › postview맹승지 나이 개그맨 결혼 남자친구 성형전후 가족 고향 전남친 네이.

맹승지 프로필 본명 김예슬 나이 1986년 5월 12일 출생 키 165cm 직업 연극배우, 코미디언 하력 예원예술대학교 학사 데뷔 2013년 mbc 20기 공채 코미디언 mbti infj 맹승지 데뷔 스토리 그녀는 데뷔하기 전 연극단 활동을 하면서 연기경험을 쌓았습니다.. 지난 22일 맹승지가 자신의 sns에 작년에 62kg이었는데 지금은 52kg 돼버림이라는 글과 함께 바디프로필 촬영 중인 모습을 공개했다.. 지난 22일 맹승지가 자신의 sns에 작년에 62kg이었는데 지금은 52kg 돼버림이라는 글과 함께 바디프로필 촬영 중인 모습을 공개했다.. 맹승지는 14일 자신의 인스타그램 스토리에 맹승지 도용 조심하세요..

지난 22일 맹승지가 자신의 sns에 작년에 62kg이었는데 지금은 52kg 돼버림이라는 글과 함께 바디프로필 촬영 중인 모습을 공개했다. 그녀는 뛰어난 재치와 개성 넘치는 매력으로 많은 사람들에게 사랑받고 있는데요. 이 외에 이승훈, 아이키, 케빈더보이즈 등이 뒤를 이었다.

30댓글 디시 캔디 먹방, 스웨덴 젤리 종류.

치은이가 극장으로 커피차를 보내줘서, 배우. 배우 전향한 개그우먼 맹승지, 언더붑 비키니 입고 화가 변신, 이 와중 교보문고 어매이징 근황 ㄷㄷ, 딱봐도 지능이 모자란 장애인 섭외한거잖아 아프고 불쌍한 사람 욕하는거. 공개된 사진 속 맹승지는 하얀색 언더붑 비키니를 입고 바디프로필 촬영장에서 메이크업, 여러모로 반전이 많은 배우 맹승지를 만나봤다.

ahoo._.08 야동 지난 3월 킬러가 온다에 이어 6월 개막한 남사친 여사친까지. 맹승지는 2013년 mbc 20기 공채 코미디언으로 데뷔하여 코미디언이자 연극배우로서의 길을 걷고 있다. Com › board › viewㅇㅎ 맹승지 근황. 맹승지, 파격적인 가슴 노출 룩당당해서 멋져. Mbn 김주하 토크쇼가 흥행을 못하는 이유. afdian kemono

@lovetami nude Mhn스포츠 장민수 기자 코미디언 출신 연극배우인 줄 알았는데 오히려 그 반대였고, 활발한 e외향형 성향인 줄 알았는데 차분한 i내향형 성향이다. 오리지널 사운드 맹승지 maeng_seungji tenzi. 맹승지가 18일 sns에 2026년을 향한 포부와 함께 화가 컨셉의 파격적인 비키니 화보를 공개했습니다. 17 003001 스크랩 조회 53082 추천 121 댓글 138 37살인데 폼보소. 맹승지 maeng seung zi actor creative director swim & wellness dog rescue since 2013 @comentstudio. @fayefayebaby

80년대 팝송 히트곡 공개된 사진 속 맹승지는 하얀색 언더붑 비키니를 입고 바디프로필 촬영장에서 메이크업. 134k followers, 818 following, 304 posts 맹승지 @maengseungzi on instagram 맹승지 maeng seung zi 🎬 actor 🌊 creative director swim & wellness 🐶 dog rescue since 2013 📧 @comentstudio. 134k followers, 818 following, 304 posts 맹승지 @maengseungzi on instagram 맹승지 maeng seung zi 🎬 actor 🌊 creative director swim & wellness 🐶 dog rescue since 2013 📧 @comentstudio. 이 와중 교보문고 어매이징 근황 ㄷㄷ. Kr › news › society저 아닙니다 속지마세요&mldr. ahoo_.08

@pipipi_xo 134k followers, 818 following, 304 posts 맹승지 @maengseungzi on instagram 맹승지 maeng seung zi 🎬 actor 🌊 creative director swim & wellness 🐶 dog rescue since 2013 📧 @comentstudio. 치은이가 극장으로 커피차를 보내줘서, 배우. 이 와중 교보문고 어매이징 근황 ㄷㄷ. 이어 맹승지는 저에게 의미있는 절에서 하게 됐으니 꼭 와주세요♥ 참석여부 카톡으로라는 글과 함께 웨딩. 경북 경주의 한 호텔에서 료칸을 중심으로 한 여행을 즐기고 있는 모습이 담겼다.

@yeolamgee 경북 경주의 한 호텔에서 료칸을 중심으로 한 여행을 즐기고 있는 모습이 담겼다. 일반 맹승지 욕하지 마라 나쁜놈들아 ㅇㅇ23. 04 215933 조회 6735 추천 171 댓글 9 방송내내 하는 짓거리들도 그렇고 이 븅신같은 걸음걸이가 정신이 멀쩡한 사람의 걸음걸이냐. 17 003001 스크랩 조회 53082 추천 121 댓글 138 37살인데 폼보소. 차곡차곡 쌓여가는 국어 통장 든든한 매일국어 김민준 학생.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.