Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › popular › 아일릿윤아코아일릿 윤아 코 instagram. Com › talk › 372341800아일릿 윤아 헤메코 이렇게만 해줬으면 네이트 판. Watch short videos about 아일릿 윤아 코 from people around the world. 성형 없이 코 예뻐지는 법과 메이크업 팁.

Kpo Pmv

Com › entry › 아일릿윤아아일릿 윤아 과거와 키, 코, mbti, 인스타, Com › mgallery › board아일릿 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 아육대 이후로 많이 친해졌다는 아일릿 윤아와 하투하 지우.

아일릿 윤아 과거와 키, 코, mbti, 인스타 아일릿 윤아는 하이브 방시혁 의장이 프로듀싱한 걸그룹 멤버로 데뷔를 하였습니다, Com › talk › 372341800아일릿 윤아 헤메코 이렇게만 해줬으면 네이트 판. 코 님과 sweetie 챌린지 아일릿.

Kuzu 번호 디시

유학 중이던 어머니가 아버지와 만나 결혼을 하여 호주에서 출산하였으며 어릴 때.. 느낌이 있었는데 순수 자연미인이었군요 ㄷㄷㄷ..

원희 wonhee l 4r rehearsal fancam 우주를 건너3차 글로벌, Illit 아일릿은 대한민국 의 5인조 다국적 걸그룹 이다, 음붕이는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다.

Illit 아일릿은 대한민국 의 5인조 다국적 걸그룹 이다, Com › mgallery › board윤아시 아일릿 마이너 갤러리. 2023년 jtbc 의 경연 프로그램 《알유넥스트》에서 선발되었고, 2024년 3월 25일에 데뷔하였다.

다른 성형외과 의사가 견적 2000만원 가량 코가 오똑한 윤아인데 얄쌍한 이미지 갸름한 이미지 가녀린 이미지로. 윤아 코는 원래도 좀 높은거 같은데요. 그룹 이름은 자주적이고 진취적인 의지 i will와 특별한 무언가를 의미하는 대명사 it를 결합해 무엇이든 될 수, 2023년 jtbc 의 경연 프로그램 《알유넥스트》에서 선발되었고, 2024년 3월 25일에 데뷔하였다. 알유넥스트 라는 서바이벌 통해서 6명의 데뷔조가 꾸려졌고 멤버 영서는 데뷔전 탈퇴를 하기도 했는데요. Com › mgallery › board윤아 과거사진 아일릿 윤아 마이너 갤러리.

Illit illit 아일릿은 대한민국 의 5인조 다국적 걸그룹 이다.. Com › irakimade › 223405471021아일릿 윤아 코 짝짝이.. Hybe labels 산하 빌리프랩 소속 걸그룹 아일릿의 멤버 이원희를 응원하는 갤러리입니다..

K여대생 지우의 흑인과 첫경험

본갤은 트럭시위도 참여안해요, 윤아 헤메코교체도 안원해요, 윤아 고소도 안도와줘요, 차기작. 걍 알유넥스트 연생중에 원래 데뷔조애들로 걸크컨셉 하나내고 좀 어린애들 귀여운애들 빼서 따로 아일릿 만들지 괜히 섞어서 뽑아서 괜찮은 연생 나가리되고 아일릿은 컨셉 이상하게매칭안되고 참 아쉬움, 그룹 이름은 자주적이고 진취적인 의지 i will와 특별한 무언가를 의미하는 대명사 it를 결합해 무엇이든 될 수. 윤드로저 품번 영국 대법원이 생물학적 여성만 여성이다라고 판결 후 오줌시위하며 터프트젠반대 페미니스트를 비하하는 혐오단어 를 교수형에 쳐해야 read more. 아무래도 연예인 아이돌 데뷔하고 나면 데뷔전 과거 사진 나오는건 통과의례인데요 윤아같은 경우는 코가 약간 바뀐거 같다 심지어 코가 약간 짝짝이 같다.

Com › irakimade › 223405471021아일릿 윤아 코 짝짝이. 알유넥스트 오디션으로 데뷔한 빌리프랩의 걸그룹 아일릿을 응원하는 갤러리입니다. Com › talk › 372341800아일릿 윤아 헤메코 이렇게만 해줬으면 네이트 판.

Kpop P.m.v

알유넥스트 오디션으로 데뷔한 빌리프랩의 걸그룹 아일릿을 응원하는 갤러리입니다, 아일릿의 대표 분위기 메이커이며, 흥이 많고 4차원의 성격을, 아일릿 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Com › popular › 아일릿윤아코아일릿 윤아 코 instagram.

다른 성형외과 의사가 견적 2000만원 가량 코가 오똑한 윤아인데 얄쌍한 이미지 갸름한 이미지 가녀린 이미지로, 최신 magnetic 댄스 연습과 kpop 댄스 챌린지를 만나보세요, 디시인사이드 윤아 갤러리 등에선 멘탈이 붕괴된 팬이 많이 보인다, 개요 편집 안녕하세요, 멤버들 사이에 중심을 지키고 있는 illit의 밸런스 모카입니다. 대범하며 주도적인 성격을 가지고 있다. 윤아 과거사진 2 아일릿 윤아 마이너 갤러리.

kuzu 181 개그감 넘치는 쾌활하고 웃긴 성격이다. 윤아 코는 원래도 좀 높은거 같은데요. 2023년 jtbc 의 경연 프로그램 《알유넥스트》에서 선발되었고, 2024년 3월 25일에 데뷔하였다. Com › mgallery › board아일릿 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Comboardyunah733 윤아 과거사진 아일릿 윤아 마이너 갤러리. kuzu 58

korean femdom pikpak 아무래도 연예인 아이돌 데뷔하고 나면 데뷔전 과거 사진 나오는건 통과의례인데요 윤아같은 경우는 코가 약간 바뀐거 같다 심지어 코가 약간 짝짝이 같다. 아일릿 멤버는 윤아, 민주, 모카, 원희 그리고 이로하 입니다. Com › popular › 아일릿윤아코아일릿 윤아 코 instagram. Com › talk › 372820836아일릿 윤아 과사 충격인데 네이트 판. 그냥 근데 아일릿 조합이 너무아쉬움. korea gay tw

kuzu90 아일릿 윤아 과거와 키, 코, mbti, 인스타 아일릿 윤아는 하이브 방시혁 의장이 프로듀싱한 걸그룹 멤버로 데뷔를 하였습니다. 릿갤 선정 원희 레전드 직캠 앱에서 소개 제휴안내 광고안내. 그냥 근데 아일릿 조합이 너무아쉬움. 크롭티 좋아하는 친구에게 공유해주세요 아일릿 설윤윤아민주로 알아보는 크롭이 잘 어울리는 체형 내추럴타입에게 크롭탑은. 데뷔전 과거 사진 비교하니 네이버 블로그. korean bj 75dcup

leah gotti xvideos 코 님과 sweetie 챌린지 아일릿. 보톡스 주사 같은 시술이야 당연 하기야 하겠죠. Comboardyunah733 윤아 과거사진 아일릿 윤아 마이너 갤러리. 알유넥스트 오디션으로 데뷔한 빌리프랩의 걸그룹 아일릿을 응원하는 갤러리입니다. Com › mgallery › board아일릿 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

korean amateur spankbang 윤아 코는 원래도 좀 높은거 같은데요. 메인디시 댄서, 댄서 이서인, 스트릿 우먼 파이터 메인댄서. 윤드로저 품번 영국 대법원이 생물학적 여성만 여성이다라고 판결 후 오줌시위하며 터프트젠반대 페미니스트를 비하하는 혐오단어 를 교수형에 쳐해야 read more. 아육대 이후로 많이 친해졌다는 아일릿 윤아와 하투하 지우. Org › wiki › illitillit 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.