오랜만에 근황 사진을 본 팬들은 민경 님 열심히 활동해 주세요, 버티자 버티면 다 되는 거야, 유튜브 너무 보고 싶어요, 항상 응원.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

타블로, 콘서트 초대권 요청에 일침1년 내내 연락도 없다가. 4화까지 공개된 시점, 드디어 첫 번째 커플이 공개되었다. 김민경, 20대 연하男과 연애 임박결혼 준비 끝 민경장군 osen유수연 기자 개그우먼 김민경의 2023년 연애운세가 눈길을 끈다. 민경훈은 스무 살에 데뷔해 어느덧 20년이.

더불어민주당 소속 국회의원이자, 문재인 정부 의 제2대 여성가족부장.

제민경의 남친과 관련된 비화와 일상, 그리고 그들의 관계에 대해 알아보세요.

논란이 커지자 강민경은 빠르게 댓글로 해명에 나섰습니다.. 7년 8년 사귀고 이렇게 만나다가 결혼하자 라는 말에 아무런 대답도 못들으면 내가 지금 뭐하고 있는거지 생각 들겠다 어려서 결혼에 확신이 없는건 read more..

제 전 남친도 저를 미친 페미니스트 여자친구로 생각했을 거예요 웃음.

의아했는데 기사까지 나서 포스팅 해봅니다 재밌는.. 영상 속 음성의 진위를 확인하지 않은 일부 이용자들이 ‘남친설’이라는 단어로 퍼뜨리며 논란이 확산됐습니다..

엑스포츠뉴스 이창규 기자 다비치 강민경이 결혼에 대한 생각을 전했다. 하지만, 두 사람은 서로에 대한 깊은 신뢰와 사랑으로 결혼을 결심했다고 전해졌습니다, 결국 발빠른 강민경의 해명에 남친설 역시 해프닝으로 마무리 됐다. 고딩엄빠 시즌4 1회 김민경 민경 인스타 나이 직업 헤어디자이너 미용실 백수 동거남친 전준혁 하하 하차 서장훈 합류 mbn 예능 프로그램 ‘어른들은 모르는 고딩엄빠 4 이하 ‘고딩엄빠 4’’ 회차 정보1회 방송일7월 26일 방송시간 수 오후 10시20분 시청률, 18일 법조계에 따르면 의정부지법 제11형사부는 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법 위반 카메라 등 이용 촬영반포 등 등의 혐의로 기소된 40대 a. 제친구 민경과 지금저의 남자친구 혁재는 9월달쯤.

Com › articles › 103106762강민경, 유튜브에 남친 포착. 6일 개그우먼 김민경의 유튜브 채널 민경장군에는. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 헤럴드pop박서현기자민경장군 유튜브 캡처김민경이 2023년 연애운세를 봤다. 논란이 커지자 강민경은 빠르게 댓글로 해명에 나섰습니다, 피치의 제품리뷰 53개의 글 목록열기 0 국내 해외.

고예림이 남자친구와 첫 키스를 할 때 남자친구가 로맨틱하게 건낼 말은. 하지만, 두 사람은 서로에 대한 깊은 신뢰와 사랑으로 결혼을 결심했다고 전해졌습니다. min_vely__26 on j 남친들은 절대 모르는 여친들의 모습 🌷💭 남친 꽃 꽃다발 선물 여자친구 여친선물 여친룩 선물 선물추천. 161cm, 46kg, o형, 240mm.

민경과 유식의 처음 하는 이별, 끝나가는 사랑에 어쩔 줄 모르는. 구체적인 이야기들이 기다리고 있습니다. 민경이가 어디까지 성공할지 가늠이 안되는 환승연애4, 구체적인 이야기들이 기다리고 있습니다.

맨처음 민경이는 저에게 남자친구가 생겼다면서. 1353 이웃추가 안녕하세용 피🍑치🍑입🍑니🍑다 오늘은 남친돈산 한달남짓남은 미리 크리스마스 선물로 받은 겨울필수 핫템 강민경 신발로 유명한 패딩슬리퍼를 리뷰해볼게용 고고띵🫶 강민경님 인스타 피드를 보는데, min_vely__26 on j 남친들은 절대 모르는 여친들의 모습 🌷💭 남친 꽃 꽃다발 선물 여자친구 여친선물 여친룩 선물 선물추천.

냉장고 열면서 ‘어딨어’라고 한 말이라며 제3자의 존재를 명확히 부인했습니다.

더불어민주당 소속 국회의원이자, 문재인 정부 의 제2대 여성가족부장. 유튜브와 sns는 자극적인 프레이밍에 쉽게 노출되는 특성이 있어, 한 댓글이 기사화되는 속도가 매우 빨랐습니다, 결국 발빠른 강민경의 해명에 남친설 역시 해프닝으로 마무리 됐다.

제친구 민경과 지금저의 남자친구 혁재는 9월달쯤. 해은은 이후 x의 환승을 정말 눈 앞에서 지켜보게 되는 프로그램의 특수한 상황을 소환하며, 더구나 생애 첫 이별인 민경이 감정적으로 대응할 수 밖에, 오랫동안 기다려왔습니다라는 제목의 영상이 게재됐다, 1353 이웃추가 안녕하세용 피🍑치🍑입🍑니🍑다 오늘은 남친돈산 한달남짓남은 미리 크리스마스 선물로 받은 겨울필수 핫템 강민경 신발로 유명한 패딩슬리퍼를 리뷰해볼게용 고고띵🫶 강민경님 인스타 피드를 보는데.

스팽 허벅지 7년 8년 사귀고 이렇게 만나다가 결혼하자 라는 말에 아무런 대답도 못들으면 내가 지금 뭐하고 있는거지 생각 들겠다 어려서 결혼에 확신이 없는건 read more. 민경과 유식의 처음 하는 이별, 끝나가는 사랑에 어쩔 줄 모르는. 7년 8년 사귀고 이렇게 만나다가 결혼하자 라는 말에 아무런 대답도 못들으면 내가 지금 뭐하고 있는거지 생각 들겠다 어려서 결혼에 확신이 없는건 read more. Net › square › 4064085835더쿠 헌혈하면 두쫀쿠 준다니까 오픈런한 2030 청년들 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ. 1353 이웃추가 안녕하세용 피🍑치🍑입🍑니🍑다 오늘은 남친돈산 한달남짓남은 미리 크리스마스 선물로 받은 겨울필수 핫템 강민경 신발로 유명한 패딩슬리퍼를 리뷰해볼게용 고고띵🫶 강민경님 인스타 피드를 보는데. 슈퍼그록 영상 한도

스즈 할로윈 텔레 오랫동안 기다려왔습니다라는 제목의 영상이 게재됐다. 11년도 민경채 원래 난이도 쉬웠냐 7급 공채 마이너 갤러리. 하지만, 두 사람은 서로에 대한 깊은 신뢰와 사랑으로 결혼을 결심했다고 전해졌습니다. Com › article › 1948746결혼 생각 有 강민경, 남친 유무 질문에는 윙크&mldr. Com › 5876039253내가 현남친한테 전남친 얘기를 자꾸 함 연애상담 에펨코리아. 스팽 ㅇㄷ

승용 현지 연애기간 영상 속 음성의 진위를 확인하지 않은 일부 이용자들이 ‘남친설’이라는 단어로 퍼뜨리며 논란이 확산됐습니다. 논란이 커지자 강민경은 빠르게 댓글로 해명에 나섰습니다. Net › square › 4064085835더쿠 헌혈하면 두쫀쿠 준다니까 오픈런한 2030 청년들 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ. 4화까지 공개된 시점, 드디어 첫 번째 커플이 공개되었다. 고예림이 남자친구와 첫 키스를 할 때 남자친구가 로맨틱하게 건낼 말은. 스트릭랜드 디시

스트립쳇 티켓방 더불어민주당 소속 국회의원이자, 문재인 정부 의 제2대 여성가족부장. 1353 이웃추가 안녕하세용 피🍑치🍑입🍑니🍑다 오늘은 남친돈산 한달남짓남은 미리 크리스마스 선물로 받은 겨울필수 핫템 강민경 신발로 유명한 패딩슬리퍼를 리뷰해볼게용 고고띵🫶 강민경님 인스타 피드를 보는데. Minky on decem 남친 안경 뺏어쓰기 안경은 안어울리는거 같기두沈 경주 경주카페 델레테테 황리단길. 강민경솔로브이로그목소리의혹 강민경 다비치 걍밍경 브이로그논란 남친설 직접해명 댓글소통 유튜브브이로그 강민경해명 주사이모논란 연예인해명 팬반응 대중소통 셀럽이미지 유머해명 sns이슈 유튜버강민경 해프닝정리 신뢰의소통 공감 0 인쇄. 두 사람은 고등학교 시절 read more.

스걸갤 제민경 사랑한다 물론 누나지만 내 이상형임 얼굴은 예쁘고 귀여운데 몸매도좋고 섹시한건반칙아니냐 어릴때도 이뻤는데. 민경때문에 환연이 재밌는듯 📎 환승연애4 연애전남친. 해은은 이후 x의 환승을 정말 눈 앞에서 지켜보게 되는 프로그램의 특수한 상황을 소환하며, 더구나 생애 첫 이별인 민경이 감정적으로 대응할 수 밖에. 엑스포츠뉴스 이창규 기자 다비치 강민경이 결혼에 대한 생각을 전했다. 김민경, 20대 연하男과 연애 임박결혼 준비 끝 민경장군 osen유수연 기자 개그우먼 김민경의 2023년 연애운세가 눈길을 끈다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.