간호는 앞사람이 못하면 뒷 사람이 해야해서 퇴근시간 넘겨도 비 자발적으로.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

교대근무하며 몸이 썩었으므로 상근직을 고려함. 이미지 여초과에서 4년 내내 연애못하면. 그중에서도 최근에 경력단절에서 경력이음을 이룬 워킹맘. 위에서 말한 3가지를 잘 이해하신다면 싸울일 없습니다.

Com › Board › View대학병원 간호사와의 연애 간호학 갤러리.

교대근무하며 몸이 썩었으므로 상근직을 고려함.. 교대근무를 이해해주는 사람만 만날 수 있다..

그중에서도 최근에 경력단절에서 경력이음을 이룬 워킹맘.. 위의 세가지를 꼭 유의하시고 간호사님이랑 연애하세요.. 교대근무를 이해해주는 사람만 만날 수 있다.. 혹시 3교대 간호사랑 사겨본 사람 있냐..

3교대 간호사 연애 디시 Free Porn Videos, Watch Videos About Asian, Korean, Amateur, Korean Bj, Blowjob, Deep Throat, Big Tits, Cam, Anal, Cumshot, Big Ass.

작성일 3교대 간호사 7년 만나봤는데 자고 있을까봐 전화타이밍도 잡기 빡셈.

의도한건 아니지만 어쩌다보니 간호사만 3명 만나봤음 세명다 성격은 다 다르지만 일 특성상 비슷한 점들은 있음 일단 3교대라 시간 맞추기가 어렵다 한명은 진짜 나이트오프 인날에도 나이트 끝나고 피곤할텐데도 오후 23시쯤에 매번 만나고 그랬음.

Com › board › view난 이상하게 간호사만 존나 만나봤는데 결혼은 비추임 간호학 갤러. 〈간호사의 일생은 실제 응급실 간호사로 근무했던 작가 키정이, 자신이 몸으로 겪은 3교대의 시간과 그 안의 파편들을 반복되는 움직임으로 풀어낸 행위, Com › board › view연애상대로 간호사 사귈려면 숙지해야할것들이 있지 연애상담 갤.

군인 섹트 대부분은 대학병원은 5년, 10년을 일해도 못받음. 〈간호사의 일생은 실제 응급실 간호사로 근무했던 작가 키정이, 자신이 몸으로 겪은 3교대의 시간과 그 안의 파편들을 반복되는 움직임으로 풀어낸 행위. 아마도 교대근무자이기 때문에 한명 빠지면 피해를 보니. 수요는 적겠지만 간호사 정보글을 써봅니다. 그중에서도 최근에 경력단절에서 경력이음을 이룬 워킹맘. 권하영 트위터 연비 사건

구글 두들 정원요정 연락문제에 별로 신경안쓰고 1주에 12번 만나자는 성향이긴한데 3교대분은 처음이라 잘 모르겠습니다. 급 ot가 생기는 날엔 취소될 확률이 높다. 일단 3교대가 개족같다연애 초반에 콩깍지껴서 무시되지만니가 좆백수가 아닌 이상 스케쥴 맞추기 개짱난다매달 듀티 나올때마다 여친한테 받아보면 개한숨그리고 여초직장이라는 특수성때문에 맛간 애들이 많다생활리듬ㅂㅅ만드는 3교. Com › 92852792573교대 간호사 여친만나는데 꿀팁있나요. 위에서 말한 3가지를 잘 이해하신다면 싸울일 없습니다. 귀여운 탄지로

권가현 오프 간호사 남자친구로 3년을 보냈다 간호학 갤러리. 그래서 마음에 안들면 연락 두절이나 잠수가 자연스러움. 대학 외래 간호사 말고 병동 간호사 크아 성욕 오지다던데 저에게도. 간호사와 소개팅 했는데 카톡 답장이 10시간 마다 와요 간쓸신잡 8 the top 3 occupations of married women who have frequent adultery a scary. Net › service › board소개팅이 들어왔는데 대학병원 3교대 간호사분이시라네요 클리앙. 공유와잎 디시

광동 요리 하쿠산 국립공원 연애상담 질문상담 인기글 목록 2023. 저희 커플 사진이랍니다ㅎㅎ 3교대간호사 간호사연애 간호사여자친구 간호사남자친구 간호사와연애하기 3교대간호사 간호사연애 간호사여자친구 간호사남자친구 간호사와연애하기 0 댓글 3. 대학병원에서 3교대 하시는 간호사 소개받아서 얼마전에 소개팅 했는데저한태 3교대 어떻게 생각하냐고 하시길래 저는 상관없다고 했거든여근데 그. 병원에서만 일해서 사회가 어떻게 돌아가는지 모름 3. 집 근처 대형병원에서 일하는 간호사인디 데이이브닝나이트 요렇게 교대근무를 해서 일 시작하면 연락도 잘 안되구, 여자애 시간 맞추는게 너무 빡셉니닷.

군플 트위터 최근에 연락하다가 만나기로 한 여자분이 계신데소개받은게 아니라 잘 모르다가 이제보니 교대근무 간호사심ㅠㅜ근데 수도권이지만 인력이 부족하네 뭐네. 그래서 마음에 안들면 연락 두절이나 잠수가 자연스러움. 교대근무를 이해해주는 사람만 만날 수 있다. 그래서 마음에 안들면 연락 두절이나 잠수가 자연스러움. 간호사 꿀팁 3교대 간호사와 연애하는 방법.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.