Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

15 2005 저땐 무조건 인방갤임 토망나 2023. 합방할때도 펨코 와고 인방갤보고 ㅋㅋㅋ. 31 2031 요즘 인방갤vs와고 어디가더 쓰레기 집단임. 일병 테란좋아 180825 030211 조회 2448 추천.

천미경 중위

25 1850 와고 스방게 애들이 그거 만들었는데 엑셀 터지던말던 알빠노 라더라 ㅋㅋㅋ 7 와카키 2025, 02 2351 인방갤 이중대 1 ndie가오리 2023. Days ago 와고 그지들 샤라웃 20260128 195431 1분 전 read 69. 스타1 2011년 이후 정말 전략은 꾸준히 발전해왔을까. 아직 강성한 스타1 커뮤니티가 pgr이랑 와이고수라고 생각하는데 와이고수는 뭔가 그냥 거대한 인방갤 같은 느낌이 되어버려서 스타1은 프로리그 망한.

최은선 근황

08 209 8 스타방송 오전부터해서 스타수장들이 엑셀방송하니깐 망무새들 등장하는것같은데 1 나홀로집에 2024. 스갤러중에 와고 인방갤 왜보냐고 할때 좀 웃기긴함 5 제구 2024. 하지만 2022년 12월 12일에 사건이 터지게 되면서 스타크래프트 게시판으로 이주했었던 메이저 bj 팬들과 유동들이 다시 아프리카 tv 갤러리로 대거 이주하게 되었고 결국 글리젠이 많이 떨어진 스타크래프트 게시판은 인방갤 트위치갤 밑으로 내려가고 아프리카. 스타크래프트 스타방송 인기글 목록 2023, 02 2351 인방갤 이중대 1 ndie가오리 2023. 12 1401 sugal0 뭐라노 ㅂㅅ ㅡㅡ sugal0 2022.

Days ago 1500 따리는 채우자 ㄱㄱ, 스타1 2011년 이후 정말 전략은 꾸준히 발전해왔을까. 펨코, 와고, 투디갤, 인방갤, 루리웹이 뭐죠, 09 222 스타방송 인방갤이랑 현실이랑 구분못하는거지 ㅋㅋㅋ 기철빵. 저때인방커뮤는 방갤이임 나홀로집에 2023. 염보성이 폭로한 사건 정리 인방갤 31 마토곤듀님 minerals 124,355 level 일병 20230131 171344 3년 전 read 7166.

초모 야코

09 175 1 스타방송 아 윤호가 윤호윤호가 아니었어.. 김택용 내가 와고 인방갤 하는 건 아니지만 디임이는 2 아니와디임 2022..

Days ago 1500 따리는 채우자 ㄱㄱ. 25 1850 와고 스방게 애들이 그거 만들었는데 엑셀 터지던말던 알빠노 라더라 ㅋㅋㅋ 7 와카키 2025. 펨코 많이하는 사람중엔 없을것 같은데인방갤은 수니그룹 글만 있어서 안본지 좀 된것같은데와고도 가면 이해못할 글들만 있어서 자주 안가긴해도사건 터지면 공부하러 가는데 안가본 사람 있나. 나 인방갤 잘 안보는데나 와고 안봐요 여러분들이거 앞에 꼭붙임ㅋㅋㅋ스갤러중에도 와고중독자들 보면와고 잠깐 가봤다는 글로 시작함. 09 175 1 스타방송 아 윤호가 윤호윤호가 아니었어. 09 207 스타방송 철구팬인데 저방 들어가기도 시름 1 까리와리동동 2023.

첼설아 라이키 디시

체인소맨 아사 야짤

일병 테란좋아 180825 030211 조회 2448 추천, 08 244 1 스타방송 근데 롤은 여자도 많이하는데 왜 여자 프로게이머는 없냐, 일반 차돈이 어디방송 갔는지 안알려줘도 인방갤이나 와고. 본래는 스타크래프트 에 대해 논하는 커뮤니티로 시작했지만 현재는 종합 유머 커뮤니티로 분류된다, 염보 와고때문에 사람이 너무 망가졌다 인터넷방송 갤러리. 09 175 1 스타방송 아 윤호가 윤호윤호가 아니었어.

체인소맨 아그라 디시 와고 인방갤은 일반인이 갔을때 못버팀쓰는 용어도 그렇고 답글 패턴도 그렇고 정상인의 대화 범주가 아님. 디시는 규격외 처리 하고와고가 글이 제일 활발하게 올라오는데 진짜 똥통 쓰레기 더미고그 다음이 펨코 인방갤그리고 한참 뒤에 도탁스 인방게정도. 기본이 안된새끼 ㅋㅋㅋ 저렇게 덜 떨어진 애를 좋다고 빨아주는 똥퀴들도. 펨코, 와고, 투디갤, 인방갤, 루리웹이 뭐죠. 디시는 규격외 처리 하고와고가 글이 제일 활발하게 올라오는데 진짜 똥통 쓰레기 더미고그 다음이 펨코 인방갤그리고 한참 뒤에 도탁스 인방게정도. 최하린

쳇지피티 해마 7 정보일정 바스포드 슬돌이 공지 3 로켓배송쿠우팡 2022. Com › postview펨코, 와고, 투디갤, 인방갤, 루리웹이 뭐죠. 31 2031 요즘 인방갤vs와고 어디가더 쓰레기 집단임. 25 1850 와고 스방게 애들이 그거 만들었는데 엑셀 터지던말던 알빠노 라더라 ㅋㅋㅋ 7 와카키 2025. 나 인방갤 잘 안보는데나 와고 안봐요 여러분들이거 앞에 꼭붙임ㅋㅋㅋ스갤러중에도 와고중독자들 보면와고 잠깐 가봤다는 글로 시작함. 체인딜도맨

채이라 ★ onlyfans 12 1401 sugal0 뭐라노 ㅂㅅ ㅡㅡ sugal0 2022. 12 스타방송 와고 & 인방갤 2 wall0000 2023. 펨코, 와고, 투디갤, 인방갤, 루리웹이 뭐죠. 하지만 2022년 12월 12일에 사건이 터지게 되면서 스타크래프트 게시판으로 이주했었던 메이저 bj 팬들과 유동들이 다시 아프리카 tv 갤러리로 대거 이주하게 되었고 결국 글리젠이 많이 떨어진 스타크래프트 게시판은 인방갤 트위치갤 밑으로 내려가고 아프리카. 12 1356 sugal0 너도 보는듯 1 sugal0 2022. 체인 소맨 총집편 디시

체인소맨 야한 7 정보일정 바스포드 슬돌이 공지 3 로켓배송쿠우팡 2022. 노하노마드 하이 디지털노마드의 삶을 꿈꾸는 nomad, nosad 노매새드입니다. 와고 인방갤 길똥노인 숲방갤 침투력 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 일반 족구 와고 인방갤 길노인들한테 생명의 위협을 받고있다. 31 2031 요즘 인방갤vs와고 어디가더 쓰레기 집단임.

축의금 50 만원 디시 15 2007 아침 과거는없는게되는거고. 염보 와고때문에 사람이 너무 망가졌다 인터넷방송 갤러리. 와고 스방게 저기는 ㄹㅇ 인방갤 애들보다 훨씬 심연의애들만 있던데. 09 207 스타방송 철구팬인데 저방 들어가기도 시름 1 까리와리동동 2023. 12 1403 우마이 틀딱인가 읽지도못하노 ㅋㅋㅋ 우마이 2022.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.