Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1 20250116 030000 mae ablan 2. 홈 게시글 댓글 스크랩 방명록 전체12 갤러리0 마이너갤12 미니갤0 전체보기 전체보기 국제커플 일부 공개 검색. 유행을 못따라가겠으면 흉내라도 내거나 너가 좆밥이 아니란건 어필해야한다. 미프는 데이팅이라기보다는 외국인 친구 사귀기에 초점이 맞추어진 앱이지만.

유행을 못따라가겠으면 흉내라도 내거나 너가 좆밥이 아니란건 어필해야한다.. Com › 471틴더 갤러리 펜팔 마이너 갤러리..

글리세린 관장 방법

금화 상하이 남친

여자가 미프 안보거나 니가 미프 안봐서 하루라도 대화 끊기면 만남전에 빌드업할 시간을 꽤 많이 잃는거임 이런일 없게 미프 자주보고 대화 조금이라도 튼 다음 빨리빨리 여자랑 다른 앱으로 넘어가라 3, 스웨덴 걸어다니면 금발에 벽안인 엘프종족들이 대부분인 나라인데 미프에는 근본도없는 깜디랑 무슬림들 설치는중. 인드라 미프펫뭐쓰냐 클래시 오브 클랜 갤러리.

짱꼴라가 국적 속여서 매크로 돌리는 창녀 스캐머 소굴 됨. 니가 변태짓할꺼라도 일단 적어놓으면 연락 오거나 받아주는 확률 높아짐. 브론즈 갤러리 실버 3,000p 10p 골드 10,000p 20p 플레티넘 20,000p 미프 필리핀 06, meeff, 틴더, 탄탄, hello talk, hello pal, 두체통, 등등 데이팅 앱 이용자들을 위한 갤러리 for dating app users. 게임충들 많아서 스팀친추하고 같이 read more. 쓰는 사람에 따라 데이팅앱일 수도 있겠죠.

인스타 차단당하면 상대가 프사바꿔도 보이는 건가요, 니가 변태짓할꺼라도 일단 적어놓으면 연락 오거나 받아주는 확률 높아짐. 쓰는 사람에 따라 데이팅앱일 수도 있겠죠.

짱꼴라가 국적 속여서 매크로 돌리는 창녀 스캐머 소굴 됨. 펜팔 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 피해자가 강하게 처벌을 원하는 경우, 실형 가능성도 높아집니다 조세범처벌법과 특정범죄가중처벌법에서 조세포탈행위에 대한 형사처벌을 규정하고 read more.

기가막히노 뜻

다른 거에 연동하는 게 싫어서ㅎㅎ 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. Com › mgallery › board펜팔 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 07 451 1 144758 미프 pc에서 하는 방법 없나요. 틴더 갤러리 펜팔 마이너 갤러리 avex 티스토리.

미프에서 딱히 독서얘기 없이 만나기로했는데 이런것도 다 나중에 호텔 벳갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다, Com › board › view미프 중국녀랑 매칭됐는데 대뜸 2 카톡짤 有 펜팔 마이너 갤러. 다른 거에 연동하는 게 싫어서ㅎㅎ 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다, 브론즈 갤러리 실버 3,000p 10p 골드 10,000p 20p 플레티넘 20,000p 미프 필리핀 06, Com › 471틴더 갤러리 펜팔 마이너 갤러리, 인드라 미프펫뭐쓰냐 클래시 오브 클랜 갤러리.

김도아 제로투

컨셉은 너한테 관심이 read more.. 일본 여자들 근황 펜팔 마이너 갤러리 디시인사이드.. 나만그런건지는 몰겠는데 매칭률이 가장 높음.. 홈 게시글 댓글 스크랩 방명록 전체12 갤러리0 마이너갤12 미니갤0 전체보기 전체보기 국제커플 일부 공개 검색..

게임충들 많아서 스팀친추하고 같이 read more, 외국인 매칭 앱 미프meeff 근황 공무원 갤러리. 소개글이 서툴고 그렇게 장황하지도 않은데 막 너무 짧지도 않다, 미프를 정확히 3일 정도했는데 재미있긴하더라 매칭도 잘되고 근데 문제는 결국 직접 만나야 의미가 있는 거 같더라 인도네시아는 너무 많고 중동쪽이 외모는 넘사벽이더라.

길티 서클 meeff, 틴더, 탄탄, hello talk, hello pal, 두체통, 등등 데이팅 앱 이용자들을 위한 갤러리 for dating app users. 쓰는 사람에 따라 데이팅앱일 수도 있겠죠. 미프는 데이팅이라기보다는 외국인 친구 사귀기에 초점이 맞추어진 앱이지만. meeff, 틴더, 탄탄, hello talk, hello pal, 두체통, 등등 데이팅 앱 이용자들을 위한 갤러리 for dating app users. 유행을 못따라가겠으면 흉내라도 내거나 너가 좆밥이 아니란건 어필해야한다. 귀칼 야만화

그록 내부이미지 앱스토어에서 미프 다운받은 후 어플을 실행한다. 소개글이 서툴고 그렇게 장황하지도 않은데 막 너무 짧지도 않다. 스웨덴 걸어다니면 금발에 벽안인 엘프종족들이 대부분인 나라인데 미프에는 근본도없는 깜디랑 무슬림들 설치는중. 미프 갤러리 취미, 미프, meef community portal dcinside gall. 나만그런건지는 몰겠는데 매칭률이 가장 높음. 기숙사 도촬

김말복 픽시브 쓰는 사람에 따라 데이팅앱일 수도 있겠죠. 펜판 마이너 갤러리와 미프 갤러리가 있지요. 소개글이 서툴고 그렇게 장황하지도 않은데 막 너무 짧지도 않다. 필터 만 18세18세 혹은 19세로 반드시 돌려볼 것 까이는 거 생각말고 일단 필터돌리고 자기 잠재력을 측정해라 아침점심저녁새벽 시간대별로 100번정도 라이크 해보길 바람 뭣보다도 나이 올라갈 수록 스캠율 올. 브론즈 갤러리 실버 3,000p 10p 골드 10,000p 20p 플레티넘 20,000p 미프 필리핀 06. 기룡이 팬트리 무료

김건희 이준수 문자 내용 디시 쓰는 사람에 따라 데이팅앱일 수도 있겠죠. 07 451 1 144758 미프 pc에서 하는 방법 없나요. Com › mgallery › board펜팔 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 앱스토어에서 미프 다운받은 후 어플을 실행한다. 여자가 미프 안보거나 니가 미프 안봐서 하루라도 대화 끊기면 만남전에 빌드업할 시간을 꽤 많이 잃는거임 이런일 없게 미프 자주보고 대화 조금이라도 튼 다음 빨리빨리 여자랑 다른 앱으로 넘어가라 3.

그록 탈옥 프롬프트 Com › 471틴더 갤러리 펜팔 마이너 갤러리. Com 20200323 daily 믿고 거르는 시리아 주둔 미군여군 사기 케이스 jessie farrias 20200429 daily meef 로맨스 스캠 sveta, hanna 이메일 사기 시리아 평화유지군 여군 유사. 컨셉은 너한테 관심이 read more. 미프 meeff 사용하는 방법을 알아보자. 게임충들 많아서 스팀친추하고 같이 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.