Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

會員同意條款 pk雙饗卡必勝客x肯德基全新改版app. 我還有其他疑問，該如何與肯德基聯絡？ 如果您還有其他問題，請至「聯繫我們」留言，或撥服務專線0800068007，將有專人為您服務。 專線服務時間 每天早上1000至晚上1000。read more. 訂餐步驟 步驟 1：撥打 kfc 外送電話 撥打 kfc 外送電話 0800222888，專人客服將為您服務。 步驟 2：確認訂單內容 向客服人員告知您的訂單內容，包括餐點品項、份數、優惠券使用等。 步驟 3：報上地址和連絡方式 提供您的送餐地址和聯絡電話，以便外送人員. 快速電話客服熱線hotline 肯德基 快速電話客服熱線hotline kfc 元朗青山公路249251號元朗廣場地下005及006號 分店外賣電話 查看快速電話客服熱線hotline詳情.

체인소맨 레제 히토미

變更信箱、電話：請來電客服專線進行更正pk雙饗卡客服專線0800550369。 請提供您本人正確、最新及完整的資料，如因您的資料填寫不全.. 肯德基客服人工电话是4008823823。 在获取肯德基优惠信息时，有时候我们需要找人工客服才能得到详细解释，我们也可以通过寻找在线客服咨询解答。 手机：..

쵸단 Hentai

체인소맨 레제 알몸

체인소맨 요루 섹스

Tw › customerservice › contactus聯絡我們 kfc 肯德基.. 客服4128000 部分餐廳不供應此餐點，詳情請洽客服4128000 雞汁風味飯只供應至2100網路訂餐則供應至2000，但可換香酥脆薯中 飲料可加價..

최솜이 Likey 디시

최지 한 유 튜버 디시 肯德基作为全球知名的快餐连锁品牌，提供了多种渠道来联系人工客服，以便顾客在遇到问题或需要帮助时能够得到及时的解答。 以下是一些主要的联系方式： 1. 用全新kfc app，想食乜一撳就得！每月超筍優惠等你拎，立即登記成為會員。kfc更不時推出期間限定美食，萬勿錯過。免運費，外送服務至晚上11點。門店自取無最低消費。. 肯德基 客訴 電話，大家都在找解答。 如果您還有其他問題，請至「聯繫我們」留言，或撥服務專線0800068007，將有專人為您服務。 專線服務時間 每天早上1000至晚上1000。. 我還有其他疑問，該如何與肯德基聯絡？ 如果您還有其他問題，請至「聯繫我們」留言，或撥服務專線0800068007，將有專人為您服務。 專線服務時間 每天早上1000至晚上1000。read more. 我要如何訂購肯德基餐點呢？ （外帶或外送） 網路訂餐：透過電腦或手機搜尋「肯德基訂餐」或輸入網址. 최솜이 ㄲㅈ

체인소맨 두창 Kfc 即日起至20181001，至全省肯德基餐廳. 台灣總部 電話客服人員 肯德基外送訂餐中心. 用全新kfc app，想食乜一撳就得！每月超筍優惠等你拎，立即登記成為會員。kfc更不時推出期間限定美食，萬勿錯過。免運費，外送服務至晚上11點。門店自取無最低消費。. Com › company_list肯德基 快速電話客服熱線hotline列表. 若您欲行使前揭權利，請來電至必勝客或肯德基客服專線，或可至pk雙饗卡app的會員資料欄位中的「刪除會員帳號 delete account」，並依指示完成操作，即可將您的帳號刪除，預計三個工作天內會完全刪除資料。. 찬미 정리

천사의 악마 섹스 台中市西區 負責肯德基電話客服中心電話接聽，工作內容包含 1. Contact kfc kfc australia. Com 或致電+852 21800000聯絡我們客戶服務主任。你的要求將於確定後第十個工作天生效。如果你 read more. 我還有其他疑問，該如何與肯德基聯絡？ 如果您還有其他問題，請至「聯繫我們」留言，或撥服務專線0800068007，將有專人為您服務。 專線服務時間 每天早上1000至晚上1000。read more. Com › entry › 59814565常見問題 肯德基 客訴 電話. 청월당 디시

츠유리 카나오 죽음 Tw › servicepk雙饗卡聯絡專線，必勝客、肯德基客服電話 pk雙饗卡. 如欲更改、取消、確認或有其他需求，請您主動與肯德基訂餐中心4128000 聯絡手機撥打前加02。 團購訂購須知：主揪須於結單時間完畢前，進行結帳動作，官網優惠券、pk點數折 read more. 會員專區關於pk 雙饗卡優惠券信用卡優惠專區車道點餐享優惠預訂快取服務外送服務填問卷換獎勵. 先在肯德基app上面， 联系客服，给了肯德基的客服电话。 打电话给肯德基客服， 描述情况，客服问需求是什么？ 我说需求就是问这个猪肉帕尼尼在不在. 肯德基客服服務 服務時間：10002200 客服電話：0800068007 肯德基訂餐電話：4128000 手機直撥請加02 信件聯絡：s.

최솜이 야한솜이 Tw › servicepk雙饗卡聯絡專線，必勝客、肯德基客服電話 pk雙饗卡. 我要如何訂購肯德基餐點呢？ （外帶或外送） 網路訂餐：透過電腦或手機搜尋「肯德基訂餐」或輸入網址. 用全新kfc app，想食乜一撳就得！每月超筍優惠等你拎，立即登記成為會員。kfc更不時推出期間限定美食，萬勿錯過。免運費，外送服務至晚上11點。門店自取無最低消費。. Com 或致電+852 21800000聯絡我們客戶服務主任。你的要求將於確定後第十個工作天生效。如果你 read more. 用全新kfc app，想食乜一撳就得！每月超筍優惠等你拎，立即登記成為會員。kfc更不時推出期間限定美食，萬勿錯過。免運費，外送服務至晚上11點。門店自取無最低消費。.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.