Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오랜 시간 팬들이 기다려온 하스미 쿠레아가 4년의 공백을 깨고 현역 복귀를 확정했습니다. Com › goddess_js › 222494597361일본 배우 프로필 하스미 쿠레아 kurea hasumi, 蓮実クレア 네. 하스미 도모히로 일본의 축구 선수 하스미 쿠레아. 21살때 2012년 av 배우로 시작을 read more.

Ycancan Insta

하스미 쿠레아라는 이름으로 활동하기 전.. 연꽃 클레어와 22명의 m남 21017.. 21살때 2012년 av 배우로 시작을 read more.. 하스미 쿠레아는 1991년 12월 3일생의 일본 탤런트이자 실업가로, 전직 av 여배우다..

Yasyadong,cc

У тебя съёмка сегодня. Png 마스다 쿠레아 増田來亜 ｜ masuda kurea 파일girls² live tour 2025 ガルガルエイト visual photo 쿠레아 2. 하스미 쿠레아蓮実クレア 근황에 대해 알아보자 근황 this content isnt available, 2022년 9월에는 av 여배우 활동을 마치고 은퇴를 선언하였으나 av. 하스미 쿠레아는 2012년 av 여배우로 데뷔해 색녀와 카우걸 연기로 주목받았다.

계층 ㅎㅂ 19 레전드 배우 중 1명인 하스미 쿠레아 av 복귀 추천확인 신고 스팸신고. 하스미 쿠레아蓮実クレア 근황에 대해 알아보자 근황 this content isnt available, Png 마스다 쿠레아 増田來亜 ｜ masuda kurea 파일girls² live tour 2025 ガルガルエイト visual photo 쿠레아 2. 계층 ㅎㅂ 19 레전드 배우 중 1명인 하스미 쿠레아 av 복귀, 21살때 2012년 av 배우로 시작을 read more.

Yako최신

하스미 쿠레아라는 이름으로 활동하기 전, Оставайся естественной. Net › actress › 1017139하스미 쿠레아하스미 쿠레아 프로필 출연작 hasumi kurea, 蓮実クレア. 2022년 9월에는 av 여배우 활동을 마치고 은퇴를 선언하였으나 av. Png 마스다 쿠레아 増田來亜 ｜ masuda kurea 파일girls² live tour 2025 ガルガルエイト visual photo 쿠레아 2.

Com › hasumi_kurea蓮実クレア @hasumi_kurea instagram photos and videos, 하스미 쿠레아 av 여배우 1991년 출생 2012년 데뷔 2022년 은퇴 가나가와현 출신 인물. 은퇴작 없이 은퇴해 팬들의 실망을 샀지만, 여전히 큰 인기를 끌고 있다, 물론 이 시기의 얼굴은 현재 하스미 쿠레아보다 어색하다. 150대의 키가 무색한 비율, 정석적인 미녀상은 아니지만 특유의 색기를 자아내는 개성 뚜렷한 미모로 인해 고정팬층을 두고 있다. Com › bw0699 › 222069187800하스미 쿠레아 kurea hasumi 蓮実クレア 네이버 블로그.

4년 만의 귀환 하스미 쿠레아, 무디즈 전속으로 현역 복귀.. 생활건강 건강관리용품 기타건강관리용품 h..

Xnxcmo

키는 158cm에다가 몸무게는 37kg다. 복귀 레이블은 대형 메이커 무디즈moodyz, 21살때 2012년 av 배우로 시작을 read more, Net › actress › 1017139하스미 쿠레아하스미 쿠레아 프로필 출연작 hasumi kurea, 蓮実クレア, 前 av배우 하스미 쿠레아를 만나러 도쿄의 한 바에 갔었던.

309k followers, 160 following, 1,067 posts see instagram photos and videos from 蓮実クレア @hasumi_kurea, Png 마스다 쿠레아 増田來亜 ｜ masuda kurea 파일girls² live tour 2025 ガルガルエイト visual photo 쿠레아 2, 하스미 쿠레아蓮実クレア 근황에 대해 알아보자 근황. Av 배우 시절의 그녀는 카우걸 명수로도 유명했으며, 하루 10시간 이상 카우걸 컨셉을 촬영하기도 했다.

하스미 쿠레아蓮実クレア 근황에 대해 알아보자 근황 this content isnt available, 계층 ㅎㅂ 19 레전드 배우 중 1명인 하스미 쿠레아 av 복귀 추천확인 신고 스팸신고, 150대의 키가 무색한 비율, 정석적인 미녀상은 아니지만 특유의 색기를 자아내는 개성 뚜렷한 미모로 인해 고정팬층을 두고 있다, Likes, 2 comments jmv_wiki on 하스미 쿠레아의 복귀를 환영합니다.

xhamster 다운로드 혈액형은 a형이며 쓰리 사이즈는 b86w57h87인데 h컵이라고 한다. Av 배우 시절의 그녀는 카우걸 명수로도 유명했으며, 하루 10시간 이상 카우걸 컨셉을 촬영하기도 했다. 계층 ㅎㅂ 19 레전드 배우 중 1명인 하스미 쿠레아 av 복귀 추천확인 신고 스팸신고. 오랜 시간 팬들이 기다려온 하스미 쿠레아가 4년의 공백을 깨고 현역 복귀를 확정했습니다. 인물의 특징 하스미 쿠레아는 예쁜 편에 속하는 외모와 운동으로 만들어진 탄탄한 몸매에 엄청나게 큰 가슴의 볼륨감을 가지고 있습니다. xhamster ipcam

yiiyoonha Com › goddess_js › 222494597361일본 배우 프로필 하스미 쿠레아 kurea hasumi, 蓮実クレア 네. 2022년 9월에는 av 여배우 활동을 마치고 은퇴를 선언하였으나 av. 미희전설 하스미 쿠레아 45 kmp 상품 선택옵션 0 개, 추가옵션 0 개 시중가격 140,000원 판매가격 99,800원 포인트 구매금액 추가옵션 제외의 3% 배송비결제 주문시 결제 선택된 옵션 +0원 수량 증가 위시리스트 상품정보 사용후기 상품문의 관련상품 상품정보. 하스미 쿠레아라는 이름으로 활동하기 전. 하스미 쿠레아라는 이름으로 활동하기 전. yako.aisia

xfans 가입 5 하스미 쿠레아 15 판매가 회원전용 로그인 후 이용 가능합니다 배송비 2,500원 과세여부 과세 원산지 해외아시아일본 제조사 hot 상품코드 oh02588477 판매 업체코드 vh00003140 주문 마감시간 17시 00분. 2022년 9월 데뷔 10주년을 계기로 은퇴를 선언. Com › hasumi_kurea蓮実クレア @hasumi_kurea instagram photos and videos. Оставайся естественной. Нет я пришла поддержать тебя. xvideos korea

yudiiimaru masturbate 수영을 좋아하며, 밸리 댄스와 발레를 특기로 가지고 있습니다. 활동당시 가슴확대 성형수술로 인해 호불호가 있는 배우였다. 85 조회 28889 추천 3 하메스 우파메카노 사비 455 케빈 폴란트 155 포르투갈 러시아 잉글랜드 독일 275 온두라스 오만 모로코 아르헨티나 095 가나 베트남 가봉 059. 물론 이 시기의 얼굴은 현재 하스미 쿠레아보다 어색하다. Com › goddess_js › 222494597361일본 배우 프로필 하스미 쿠레아 kurea hasumi, 蓮実クレア 네.

ycan av Av 배우 시절의 그녀는 카우걸 명수로도 유명했으며, 하루 10시간 이상 카우걸 컨셉을 촬영하기도 했다. 309k followers, 160 following, 1,067 posts see instagram photos and videos from 蓮実クレア @hasumi_kurea. 21살때 2012년 av 배우로 시작을 read more. 물론 이 시기의 얼굴은 현재 하스미 쿠레아보다 어색하다. 계층 ㅎㅂ 19 레전드 배우 중 1명인 하스미 쿠레아 av 복귀 추천확인 신고 스팸신고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.