Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

헤럴드경제채상우 기자 5000만 구독자를 보유한 유튜버 아이쇼스피드21본명 대런 제이슨 왓킨스 주니어가 아프리카 20여 개국을 방문하면서 read more. 30 1420 블라 남자들은 원래 장기연애 깨지면 금방 결혼해. 익명이고 주선자도 없기 때문에 상대방과의 만남에 있어 책임감을 덜 갖게 된다. 를 시작으로, 가상 연애 시뮬레이션을 통해 연애를 구독.

Hitomi Kkan

Hot Ai Babes Imginn

Hentai Upscale

0 8 41 어쨌든 연예인입니다 귤땅 5,465. 내가 170이고 살짝 큰 수준인데 자꾸 지입으로. 블라인드 블라블라 연애 상담해주실 여성분.

아무래도 나잇대가 30대 중반 이상이 많아서 그런가정말 사랑해서, 상대가 좋아서보단상대한테 큰 리스크가 있거나 이성적 끌림도 없어도그냥 본인 나이차서 결혼을 위한 연애하는 사람이 많은듯죽도록 사랑해도 싸우도 이혼하는 마당에서로 사랑없이 시작하니 리스되고 이혼하고 바람나는거.. 블라 나는솔로 돌싱 22기 영숙 블라인드 댓글반응ㄷㄷ..

Horieros Hitomi.la

315k views 3 years ago, 를 시작으로, 가상 연애 시뮬레이션을 통해 연애를 구독, Naver 투표참여 71 하나만 선택할 수 있습니다.

갑자기 추억에 잠겨서 씀내소개 간략히 하자면 30대 초중반 결혼생각 x, 손예진박은빈넷플릭스 자신있게 내세우는 2026년 라인업, 낼 출근이기도하고 방구석에서 예전 셀소했던 경험 풀어봄1. 헤럴드경제채상우 기자 5000만 구독자를 보유한 유튜버 아이쇼스피드21본명 대런 제이슨 왓킨스 주니어가 아프리카 20여 개국을 방문하면서 read more.

Hitomi 포켓몬

결혼하고 싶으면, 남자에게 이 3가지를 꼭 하세요.. 뭣도 모르고 쪽지 다씀 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ시덥지 않은이유로 4개 쓰고나머지 6개는 셀소게시판에서 씀 애프터 항상 받는다.. 미국 오하이오 신시내티에서 태어난 아이쇼스피드는 10대 때 포트나이트, 발로란트 등의 게임 유튜버로 시작했지만 지난해 구독자 4천만명을 넘기며 대중 read more..

Com › 6791225162블라30대 남자가 느끼는 연애감정 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 난 남자고 블라에서 자주 보이는 네임드 여자 만나본 경험 적음, 블라결혼할 6년 장기연애 여친이 바람났는데 그걸 고민하는 34삼전남 실시간기자 2023. 근데 생각보다 여러 조건들이 안 맞는 사람끼리도 결혼 자주 함. 연애 비용으로 너무 압도적으로 많이 깨지는데 이야기 할 타이밍 언제로 잡을까.

highcookie 무료 방학때 마다 한국에 들어왔었는데 영국 다시 돌아올 때 히드로 공항에서 입국심사 줄 기다리다가 만났다. 이러다가 정말 30대 중반 후반 하이패스로 통과하겠다 싶어 몇일을 고민하다가. 결혼하고 싶으면, 남자에게 이 3가지를 꼭 하세요. 0 8 41 어쨌든 연예인입니다 귤땅 5,465. 오늘 자랑좀 할게ㅋㅋ나 돈좀 쓰고 왔어ㅋㅋ 존나 알중이라 아진짜 금연필 인천공항 노숙중 다들 연봉이 어떻게 돼. hpv 39번 디시

hentai manhwa Kr › zboard › view블라 연애 8개월차에 결혼 압박받는 연구원. 스토리는 홍덕, 작화는 nemone 가 담당했다. 방학때 마다 한국에 들어왔었는데 영국 다시 돌아올 때 히드로 공항에서 입국심사 줄 기다리다가 만났다. 모든 mbti 유형 중 창의적 지능과 논리 면에서 가장 뛰어나며, 반대로 비과학적이거나 논리적이지 read more. 아무래도 나잇대가 30대 중반 이상이 많아서 그런가정말 사랑해서, 상대가 좋아서보단상대한테 큰 리스크가 있거나 이성적 끌림도 없어도그냥 본인 나이차서 결혼을 위한 연애하는 사람이 많은듯죽도록 사랑해도 싸우도 이혼하는 마당에서로 사랑없이 시작하니 리스되고 이혼하고 바람나는거. how to use iqos 3 multi

hitomi 최면 채널 썸연애 팔로우 블라 셀소후기 삼성의료원 1 어제 474 43 셀소글도 정성껏 쓰시고 외모도 깔끔+가끔 훈훈하다고 듣는다고 하길래 사진공유했다가 개충격머금,하 현타와서 전남친 생각나더라ㅠ 덕분에 그날 밤 전남친한테 연락했다가 까였다. 익명이고 주선자도 없기 때문에 상대방과의 만남에 있어 책임감을 덜 갖게 된다. 재밌고 유쾌한 컨텐츠가 업로드 썸타는 사이에 톡 연락할 때2편 어질어질 하군요. 엘르코리아 elle korea @ellemagazine. 썸연애 갑자기 쓰고싶었던 블라에서 만났던 남자들 후기. hentai apples japan

hoeeeng 블라인드데이트 연애하기 어려운분 꼭 보세요광고x｜소개팅 어플로 제대로 된 사람. 여성이 안정적인 상대를 원하는건 어쩔 수 없다지만 코인 투자 비중을 1억까지 줄이는 딜도 거부하는거보면 애초에 결혼 상대로 고려하면 안되는 가치관 차이가 있어. 블라 연애결혼 다 포기했다 요즘은 남자도 외모다 도시개발계획 2025. 오늘 자랑좀 할게ㅋㅋ나 돈좀 쓰고 왔어ㅋㅋ 존나 알중이라 아진짜 금연필 인천공항 노숙중 다들 연봉이 어떻게 돼. 2026 넷플릭스 한국 라인업 2 시간을 잊게 하는 마법.

hitomi zzz 애인이랑 너무 많이 싸우는데 문득 신발장을 보다가 자꾸 여자친구가 내 자존감. 익명이고 주선자도 없기 때문에 상대방과의 만남에 있어 책임감을 덜 갖게 된다. Hours ago — 벌써 33살이다 내 주위 비혼주의 빼고 다 커플이거나 유부임 난 비혼주의인적 한 번도 없는데 강제 비혼되게 생겼다 소개도 다떨어짐 ㅠㅠ. 서울 20대 여자 소개팅에서 마무리로 쓰는 좋은 분이지만 설렘이 느껴지질 않아요 로스쿨생 남자친구와 결혼 고민. 현실적인 육각형 남자 기준직업 대기업, 공기업 등생산직 제외 라는데 기름집이나 현기모는 생산직이 더 좋지 않아.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.