Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

일반적으로 2차 비용은 1000위안에서 2000위안. Com › board › view밑에 광저우 말 나온김에 푸는 썰 여행동남아 갤러리. 아시아 시장에서 무역으로 돈 벌면서 다녀본 밤문화 가볍게 썰 풀어봄라오스 태국 베트남 캄보디아 말레이시아 중국 일본 다녀본 위 아시아 국가다 유흥들 다녀봤지만 주관적으로 중국이 끝판왕이고순위를 매기면꼴찌는 캄보디아. 엘라 비주얼로 맥심 콘테스트 돌풍 디시트렌드 데뷔 800일 맞은 플레이브, 팬들이 뽑은 kpop 그룹 1위.

일반적으로 2차 비용은 1000위안에서 2000위안.. 리슈아이거tv 광저우 리슈아이거입니다.. Ssul 바람의나라 연 마이너 갤러리..

Bondage漫画hitomi

Bda 학회 디시

Bj E000e77

Bruce_wang00

Bj 섹방

광저우 웬징루에 한인타운 있고거 kfc 옆에 보면 난메이 사우나 있다짤은 찍어논 사진 없어서 구글했다시스탬은 입장하면 팔등신의 예쁜이들이 중국 전통옷 입고 인사하고 카운터로 안내해스파사우나 중에 하나 골라서 입장스파. Comfqw1nyx dc official app, 일반 광저우 10년차 조금 넘은 짭붕이인데 짭붕이27. 저는 돈도 없는 거지라 걍 클럽가서 뭐라도 해볼 생각을 함. 질문 광저우 출장가는데 업소 추천좀 해주세요 횽님들 여행.

근데 보니까 상해는 외국인 게스트로 많이 초대합니다 그래서 저도 알아봐서 게스트로 가서 술을 마셨습니다, 출장기간을 23일 늘려서 홍콩이나 마카오 다녀오는건 어떤지, 이번 가을쯤에 중국여행 북경,상해,광저우 혼자서 계획중인데 질문있음 1. Com › toplist › tripbest2026 광저우의 클럽 베스트 10 trip, 최고의 광저우 클럽에서 신나는 edm 파티와 다양한 공연을 즐기세요.

bishop twitter 광저우 최고의 클럽을 경험해 보세요 광저우의 활기찬 클럽 문화를 즐길 준비가 되셨나요. 단 중국 대만 똑같은 짱개 기질 있어서 드센것은. 때는 광저우에서 유학할때, 내 중국 친구들이 불러 클럽에서 놀고 있었고 그 무리. 광저우 인간반잔 밀레니얼 새로운 핫플레이스. 광저우 ktv 화려한 밤의 시작 광저우에는 다양한 ktv가 있으며, 고급스러운 시설과 서비스로 유명합니다. bj지현잉 인스타

bbw 품번 단 중국 대만 똑같은 짱개 기질 있어서 드센것은. 현지 나이트 라이프를 체험한다면 클럽만 한 곳이 없죠. 펩시제로라임만삼 08 클럽 2개월 무료이용권 0원무료 0130 0321 말차에몽 190ml x 24개. 열정 넘치는 댄스 플로어부터 프리미엄 vip 라운지까지, 광저우에는 파티 마니아와 나이트라이프 애호가를 위한 다양한 클럽. Ssul 바람의나라 연 마이너 갤러리. big boob hitomi

boole r34 이스라엘, 헤즈볼라 장례식에 f35 편대 위협 상대에게 공포를 유발하는 이스라엘의 도발과 깡다구는 인정한다이스라엘 국방부 장관의 서슬퍼런 경고헤즈볼라 입장에선 그야말로 눈물바다에 재 뿌리고 갔다 작성자 배터리형고정닉. 2026 광저우의 클럽 베스트 10 트립닷컴. 광저우 할거 없네 쉬불앱에서 작성 여갤러2. Idwalkingtravel&no11135호텔에서 조식 때리고 체크아웃후 직원에게. 저는 돈도 없는 거지라 걍 클럽가서 뭐라도 해볼 생각을 함. bj갤러리

bj클레어 디시 심양 여행도중중국 사우나 큰곳 가면 사우나 시설은 한국에서 꽤 큰 목욕탕 이상되는 시설이고 때밀이는 스트리터파이터의 혼다급임. 중국정도면 대도시기준 치안이 좋은편인데 어머니가 불안하다고 별로 내가 혼자가는걸 싫어하는눈치임 어떻게하면 설득가능함. 왕복 편도 다구간 다구간 여정은 2구간에서 최대 5개 구간까지 예약하실 수 있습니다. Best가 엄선한 클럽 목록을 살펴보고 음악, 춤, 밤문화의 즐거움을 경험해 보세요. 추천 클럽에서 라이브 음악의 신나는 비트에 맞춰 밤새 춤추고 즐거운 시간을 보내는 건 어떠세요.

bj미디 나이 따먹었고 나에겐 묘하게 새로운 흥분이었다. 광저우 ktv의 경우, 선택하는 아가씨와 등급에 따라 비용이 달라지지만, 대체로 적당한 가격으로 밤문화를 충분히 즐길 수 있습니다. 유럽은 비싸서 걍 포기하고 중국, 일본중 하나를 택해야 했는데 일본어가 됨에도 일본이랑 분위기가 안 좋. Com › board › view중국 클럽 갔다온 후기 jpg. 일반적으로 2차 비용은 1000위안에서 2000위안.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.