남양유업 외손녀 황하나 패션 석방 패션부터 황하나 인스타.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

박유천, 황하나 얼굴 문신 재조명저러다 헤어지면 어떡하려고. Kr › news › articleview연예계 은퇴하겠다 박유천, 전여친 황하나 얼굴 타투 지우고. 비키니톱에 붉은색 롱스커트를 입은 나나가 황금 골반까지 자랑하며 시선을 강탈했다. 박유천황하나는 지난해 4월 열애설이 터지면서 연인관계를 인정했다.

한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 스포츠서울 권준영 인턴기자 그룹 Jyj 박유천의 피앙세 황하나 씨가 오른쪽 팔에 문신을 했다는 주장이 제기돼 눈길을 끈다.

박유천 황하나 결별설을 인정한 가운데 황하나 박유천의 문신타투가 이목을 끌고 있다.

Kr › news › articleview연예계 은퇴하겠다 박유천, 전여친 황하나 얼굴 타투 지우고.. 특히 수영복 사이로 드러나는 황금 골반 라인은 보는 이들의 시선을 강탈했다..

박유천이 황하나 얼굴을 문신까지 해서 또 뉴스에 많이 떴었지요.

Jyj 박유천, 팔뚝에 새긴 황하나 얼굴 문신타투 제거 지우. 최근 박유천의 소속사 로그북 엔터테인먼트에서는 공식 유튜브 채널을 통해 그의, 박유천, 황하나 얼굴 문신 재조명저러다 헤어지면 어떡하려고, Jyj 박유천, 팔뚝에 새긴 황하나 얼굴 문신타투 제거 지우, 지난해 공식 열애를 인정한 박유천 황하나 커플은 결혼식을 올릴.

과거 황 씨는 2015년 59월 서울 자택 등에서 필로폰을 세 차례 투약한 혐의 등으로 기소돼 징역 1년에 집행유예 2년을 받았으나 집행유예 기간 중 재차.. 지난해 공식 열애를 인정한 박유천 황하나 커플은 결혼식을 올릴 예정이었으나 잠정 연기한 바 있다.. 한편, 15일 박유천 소속사 씨제스 엔터테인먼트 측은 황씨와의 결별설에 대해 박유천과 황하나가 최근 연인 관계를 정리했다..

박유천 황하나 커플이 결별설에 휩싸이면서 박유천의 타투가 주목받고 있다, 지난해 온라인 커뮤니티에 공개된 사진에서 박유천은 여자친구 황하나의 얼굴로 추측되는 여성의 모습을 팔에 새겼다, 사회복무요원으로 복무했던 박유천이 25일 근무를 모두 마치고 소집해제됐다. 87 댓글 황하나 동영상은 골반 없던데 이 사진 사실인지 의심이 maple 20210601 1540 ip 182.

황하나, 쿨하지 못한 이별 박유천 사생활 폭로.

비슷한 시기, 그의 연인 황하나 역시 오른팔에 0922, yucheon 등 문신을 새기며 애정을 드러냈다. 문신 다 지웠네나나, 티없이 말끔한 뒤태 황금골반까지 시선, 박유천 팔에 새겨진 황하나씨를 닮은 문신을 많이 보셨을 거다. 16일 jyj 박유천과 황하나의 결별설이 불거진 이후 황하나가 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 헤어졌으니까 그만들 좀 해주세요라며 결별설을 인정했다.

이날 박유천은 군 복무의 끝을 알리며 자신을 둘러싼 논란에 대한 사과와 자신을 기다려준 팬들에게 감사한 마음을 전했다, 당시 한 연예부 기자는 박유천이 한쪽 팔을 황하나로 도배하지 않았느냐, 남양유업 창업주의 외손녀로도 유명한 황하나. 비슷한 시기, 그의 연인 황하나 역시 오른팔에 0922, yucheon 등 문신을 새기며 애정을 드러냈다. 박유천 朴裕仟 1986년 6월 4일 37세 고향 서울특별시 송파구 가락동 사는 곳 경기도 하남시 미사동 본관 밀, 236 타투한다고 걸레는 아닌데 이유 들어보니까 걸레 맞는데.

집행유예로 풀려난 황하나, 구치소 향해 허리 숙이며 한 말. 박유천, 전 연인 황하나 얼굴 문신 지웠다근황 사진 눈길 머니투데이 원문 기사전송 20201103 2027 0 ai챗으로 요약 머니투데이 마아라 기자 박유천 팬 인스타그램에 게재된 사진 사진온라인 커뮤니티 가수 겸 배우로 활동한 박유천의 근황이 담긴 사진이, 최근 다수의 온라인 커뮤니티에는 황 씨가 자신의 연인 박유천의 이름과 결혼 날짜를 담은.

이를 본 네티즌은 당시 왼팔에 황하나 얼굴인가.

다시 취재진 쪽으로 몸을 돌린 황씨는 재판 결과에 대한 질문이 나오자 항소 read more. 황하나가 1일 포털 사이트 실시간 순위를 뜨겁게 달구고 있다. 문신 다 지웠네나나, 티없이 말끔한 뒤태 황금골반까지 시선. 박유천 소속사 씨제스 엔터테인먼트 측은 15일 박유천과 황하나가 최근 연인. 당시 한 연예부 기자는 박유천이 한쪽 팔을 황하나로 도배하지 않았느냐. 박유천, 황하나 얼굴 문신 재조명저러다 헤어지면 어떡하려고.

monsnode.vom 그룹 jyj 박유천이 남양유업 창업주 외손녀 황하나씨와 결별했다. 집행유예로 풀려난 황하나, 구치소 향해 허리 숙이며 한 말. 집행유예로 풀려난 황하나, 구치소 향해 허리 숙이며 한 말. 시발 어떤 정상적인 생각 박힌 여자가 아무리 어리고 아무리 스무살 철없어도 문신 연습한다는애한테 허리를 내주냐 시발 ㅋㅋ 부탁하면 떡 도 쳐주겠네 ㅋㅋㅋ dc app 2020. 집행유예로 풀려난 황하나, 구치소 향해 허리 숙이며 한 말. monsnode femboy

model_seojin 디시 황하나, 쿨하지 못한 이별 박유천 사생활 폭로. 남양유업 창업주의 외손녀로도 유명한 황하나. 05 070212 장주영 기자 facebook 공유 twitter kakao email 복사 뉴스듣기. 박유천 황하나 결별설을 인정한 가운데 황하나 박유천의 문신타투가 이목을 끌고 있다. 한편, 15일 박유천 소속사 씨제스 엔터테인먼트 측은 황씨와의 결별설에 대해 박유천과 황하나가 최근 연인 관계를 정리했다. missjav live

minji nude fake 지난 12일 유튜브 채널 logbook official에는 박유천의 근황이 담긴 영상이 업로드됐다. Com › view › 20230417n07010박유천, 전여친 황하나 얼굴 문신 지우고 짱구 새겼다&mldr. 황하나 얼굴 문신으로 새겼던 박유천 결별 두고 벌어진 말말말 이민재 기자 inews@kookje. 236 타투한다고 걸레는 아닌데 이유 들어보니까 걸레 맞는데. Com › view › 20230417n07010박유천, 전여친 황하나 얼굴 문신 지우고 짱구 새겼다&mldr. missjav.c

msn무료 게임 한편 나나는 류승완 감독의 영화 휴민트를 차기작으로 선택했다. 황하나가 1일 포털 사이트 실시간 순위를 뜨겁게 달구고 있다. 지난 12일 유튜브 채널 logbook official에는 박유천의 근황이 담긴 영상이 업로드됐다. 지난해 공식 열애를 인정한 박유천 황하나 커플은 결혼식을 올릴 예정이었으나 잠정 연기한 바 있다. Kr › news › articleview연예계 은퇴하겠다 박유천, 전여친 황하나 얼굴 타투 지우고.

myfans 무료로 박유천이 황하나 얼굴을 문신까지 해서 또 뉴스에 많이 떴었지요. 황하나 얼굴 문신으로 새겼던 박유천 결별 두고 벌어진 말말말 이민재 기자 inews@kookje. 최근 다수의 온라인 커뮤니티에는 황 씨가 자신의 연인 박유천의 이름과 결혼 날짜를 담은. 한편, 15일 박유천 소속사 씨제스 엔터테인먼트 측은 황씨와의 결별설에 대해 박유천과 황하나가 최근 연인 관계를 정리했다. 은퇴를 선언했으나 이를 번복하고 연예계 활동을 이어가고 있는 그룹 jyj 출신 박유천의 근황이 전해졌다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.