Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

원래 자신이 트젠루트 타고 싶은데 불가능하다고 느끼면 회피하고 남 욕박는거지 dc official app. 126 2233 27 0 4267937 1 친월잇 2233 39 0. 235 0256 69 0 4019376 내동생돼지임 3 tama 0251 78 0 4019375 잠깼다 3 진리리 0250 39 0 4019373 걍 빠방이 밥만주고왓음. 85 1 여장갤특병신은 병신끼리 어울림 여갤러118.

Sotwe 体育生

Sotwe 고3게이

Sotwe Solo Colmek

남자 멸치 몸뚱이에 실리콘 두짝 붙인 느낌인데차라리 해골보다 살집있는게 더 낫겠다.. Com › board › view친월 면박 트젠이잖아 ㅋㅋㅋ 여장 갤러리.. 친월잇 2236 14 0 4267940 이래서 남자는 무조건 키임 다 필요없당께 ㄹㅇ 피아제 시계39..

Sotwe 선생

22 115401 삭제 친월잇 @글쓴 여갤러 106.. 삭제 시 닉네임 등록 가능read more..

Snaptokyo Nude

친월잇 2236 14 0 4267940 이래서 남자는 무조건 키임 다 필요없당께 ㄹㅇ 피아제 시계39. 위스키바틀샵 탑스피리츠사장님 너무 친철하더라 영업시간 지났는데도 수령도와주심2. 08 76 0 4030350 아 시발 후회되네 3 여갤러211. Com › board › view친월아 이옷이다 여장 갤러리. 234 0704 46 1 4242426 기상창 1 백규리 0701 30 1 4242424 20살 남자앤대 키 197 정도 되더라 シンアリン 0658 52 0 4242423 후장딸 5 하나 0655 157 4 4242421 저 반성, Com › board › view트젠 꼬시는법 이거맞져.

Com › board › view친월이 estp 인듯, Com › board › view노가다 체격 십장아재손 시디 여장 갤러리, 동남아시아국가연합asean의 정회원국으로 수도는 하노이. 이야기들어보니러버시디 밴드모임인가있는거 같던데회비내고 노는거야. 친월잇 0705 30 1 4242435 친월이 젖탱이랑 빵댕이봐라 체늬 0705 56 2 4242431 왜하필이면내가도태지 3 빅규203. 위스키바틀샵 탑스피리츠사장님 너무 친철하더라 영업시간 지났는데도 수령도와주심2.

금딸중이었는데 니 영상 찾다가 꼴려서 실패했잔아. 빵디 개큰 여붕이 여장 갤러리@pobeulsu, 업사진 가져왔어 오늘도 똥손이구나 친월잇 상세글 올려줌 바밤바 꼭 보셈.

sotwe baby alien 234 0704 46 1 4242426 기상창 1 백규리 0701 30 1 4242424 20살 남자앤대 키 197 정도 되더라 シンアリン 0658 52 0 4242423 후장딸 5 하나 0655 157 4 4242421 저 반성. 235 0256 69 0 4019376 내동생돼지임 3 tama 0251 78 0 4019375 잠깼다 3 진리리 0250 39 0 4019373 걍 빠방이 밥만주고왓음. 친월잇 0037 8 0 4040923 좆목팸이랑 다굴빵친거 해명 안했잖아개샛기야 1 여갤러223. 08 76 0 4030350 아 시발 후회되네 3 여갤러211. 진짜 많이 달라졌네무슨 육변기 타투하던때까지만해도 내가 알던 예전모습좀 남아있던데지금은 마스크쓰고 다니기도 하고. sophiexdtprivate

so_so4123 Com › board › view친월 면박 트젠이잖아 ㅋㅋㅋ 여장 갤러리. Com › board › view짝사랑은 쉽지 않다 털어버린 줄 알았던 감정이 찌꺼기마냥 남아있었. 친월잇 1315 76 0 4176571 일자리 뭐 해야되지 ㅜㅜ 우울하다 취업 9 개트젠 1315 73 0 4176570 밥먹고나니 졸리다 4 뚠땡이련 1314 38 0 4176569 이 나이에 성형하면 후회하겠지 3 ㅇㅈㄷ112. Com › board › view트젠 꼬시는법 이거맞져. 남자 멸치 몸뚱이에 실리콘 두짝 붙인 느낌인데차라리 해골보다 살집있는게 더 낫겠다. sotwe hyunjin

spankbang 子供 234 0704 46 1 4242426 기상창 1 백규리 0701 30 1 4242424 20살 남자앤대 키 197 정도 되더라 シンアリン 0658 52 0 4242423 후장딸 5 하나 0655 157 4 4242421 저 반성. 이거 웃기지않농 dc official app. S__hluvs tweet photo. 진짜 많이 달라졌네무슨 육변기 타투하던때까지만해도 내가 알던 예전모습좀 남아있던데지금은 마스크쓰고 다니기도 하고. 235 0036 16 0 40xx29073 tama 0035 24 0 4040920 나이든 보추가 꼴린다 여갤러39. sotwe twitter search

sotwe 유람선 친월잇 보고 왔는데 존나이쁘네 어디가면 볼수있냐 여장. 08 133 5 4030354 눈바디 2 tama 09. 오늘 너무 박혔나봐 이대로 딸 치면 받싸하는 느낌이겠지,, dc official app. 진짜 많이 달라졌네무슨 육변기 타투하던때까지만해도 내가 알던 예전모습좀 남아있던데지금은 마스크쓰고 다니기도 하고. 삭제 시 닉네임 등록 가능read more.

sone-975 torrent 여갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 08 76 0 4030350 아 시발 후회되네 3 여갤러211. Com › board › view노가다 체격 십장아재손 시디 여장 갤러리. 진짜 많이 달라졌네무슨 육변기 타투하던때까지만해도 내가 알던 예전모습좀 남아있던데지금은 마스크쓰고 다니기도 하고. 친월잇이라는 애 줜나 이쁘네 여장 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.