Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Top 候補者 選考方法 撮影会・イベント ミニフォトカード くじ エントリー no. 24歳グラドル仲根詩織がビジネスサウナーだとぶっちゃけ「熱いの 身長も容疑者と同じ175センチ. 仲根詩織さんの 公式instagram 仲根詩織さんの 公式tiktok 情報の不備・問題を報告 今日が誕生日の有名人 01月27日 清水ミチコ タレント 1960年1月27日生まれ 岐阜県高山市出身 雛形あきこ 俳優（男優・女優） 1978年1月27日生まれ 東京都江戸川区出身 上白石萌音. Top 候補者 選考方法 撮影会・イベント ミニフォトカード くじ エントリー no.

이이경 폭로녀 디시

이소은 계단 디시

スリーサイズ b 86cm w 57cm h 88cm.. @bellbee_nagoya by customer photoshoots ∩📷⊂..

2000年11月5日（25歳） 162cm a型 グラビアアイドル ダーツ選手（ダーツプレイヤー）, プロフィール 出身地 千葉 職業 タレント 誕生日 2000115 身長・スリーサイズ 162cm b86 w57 h88 趣味 サウナと神社巡り 特技 変顔とバトミントン sns x 旧twitter） @shiooori_15 instagram @shioringo7131 tiktok @shioringo7131. □ スリーサイズ b86cm w57cm h88cm. 2000年 11月5日 出身地 千葉県 a型身長162cm b80 w60 h88 靴24.

이직로그 Nude

仲根詩織さんの 公式instagram 仲根詩織さんの 公式tiktok 情報の不備・問題を報告 今日が誕生日の有名人 01月27日 清水ミチコ タレント 1960年1月27日生まれ 岐阜県高山市出身 雛形あきこ 俳優（男優・女優） 1978年1月27日生まれ 東京都江戸川区出身 上白石萌音. Players 〜 プレイヤー 〜 hyper electra ハイパーエレクトラ, 「1st impact ハイレグコーデ」グラドル・仲根詩織なかね. プロフィール 出身地 千葉 職業 タレント 誕生日 2000115 身長・スリーサイズ 162cm b86 w57 h88 趣味 サウナと神社巡り 特技 変顔とバトミントン sns x 旧twitter） @shiooori_15 instagram @shioringo7131 tiktok @shioringo7131. ：aircontrol（エアーコントロール）の1st impact ハイレグコーデ：仲根詩織 紹介 仲根詩織なかねしおり. 仲根 詩織5375｜shiori nakane 2025 231位 deepit laboratory tokyo 性別 女性 誕生日 11月5日 身長 162 血液型 a型 利き腕 右 地域 東京都 ダーツ歴 rt.

Jp › directory_detail仲根 詩織｜選手名鑑｜soft darts professional tour japan official, スリーサイズ, b86・w57・h88 cm, Top 候補者 選考方法 撮影会・イベント ミニフォトカード くじ エントリー no. 仲根 詩織5375｜shiori nakane 2025 231位 deepit laboratory tokyo 性別 女性 誕生日 11月5日 身長 162 血液型 a型 利き腕 右 地域 東京都 ダーツ歴 rt, 名前：仲根詩織、塩りんご（tiktok） 本名： 誕生日：2000年11月05日 年齢：24歳（20205年4月時点） 出身地： 身長：162cm 体重： カップサイズ：fカップ.

이치트

Com › shioringo7131仲根詩織 shiori nakane @shioringo7131 instagram. 28k followers, 80 following, 145 posts 仲根詩織 shiori nakane🍎 @shioringo7131 on instagram ダーツのプロもしてます🎯 🐶 @mameshiba. プロフィール 名前：仲根詩織、塩りんご（tiktok） 本名：非公開 誕生日：2000年11月05日 年齢：24歳（20205年4月時点） 出身地：千葉県 身長：162cm 体重：非公開 カップサイズ：fカップ スリーサイズ：b86 w57 h88 足のサイズ：24.

2000年11月5日（25歳） 162cm a型 グラビアアイドル ダーツ選手（ダーツプレイヤー）, 2000年 11月5日 出身地 千葉県 a型身長162cm b80 w60 h88 靴24, 趣味 占い,サウナ,神社巡り,カフェ巡り.

仲根 詩織 psjapan公式アンバサダーミスセブン, 23 仲根詩織 ナカネシオリ アピールポイント エクボと長い脚です！ プロフィール 出身地 千葉 職業 タレント 誕生日 2000115 身長・スリーサイズ 162cm b86 w57 h88 趣味 サウナと神社巡り 特技 変顔とバトミントン sns x 旧. 仲根詩織なかねしおり アイドル イメージビデオメーカー. 仲根詩織 san 水着ポートレート 撮影会ポトレ：myphotostyle. Others with a similar name, 仲根詩織のプロフィールページです。 利用規約 プライバシーポリシー 特定商取引 推奨環境 運営会社 faq コラボレーション リアルイベント お問い合わせ.

「1st impact ハイレグコーデ」グラドル・仲根詩織なかね. 仲根詩織 san 水着ポートレート 撮影会ポトレ：myphotostyle, ：aircontrol（エアーコントロール）のハイレグフラッペ：仲根詩織 紹介 仲根詩織なかねしおり. Jp › entertainment › news股下86センチダーツァー「加工してません」驚きの足長ショット公開「, 5cm 趣味カフェ巡り、ショッピング、岩盤浴特技バドミントン tiktok @shioringo7131, Jp › jimbutsu › p170380仲根詩織さんのプロフィール.

이직로그 조이 야짤

24歳グラドル仲根詩織がビジネスサウナーだとぶっちゃけ「熱いの 身長も容疑者と同じ175センチ. Days ago グラビアアイドルでプロダーツァーの仲根詩織（25）が26日、自身のインスタグラムを更新し、冬のコーディネートを披露した。 仲根は「人生初, 1st impact ハイレグコーデ 仲根詩織. プロフィール 名前：仲根詩織、塩りんご（tiktok） 本名：非公開 誕生日：2000年11月05日 年齢：24歳（20205年4月時点） 出身地：千葉県 身長：162cm 体重：非公開 カップサイズ：fカップ スリーサイズ：b86 w57 h88 足のサイズ：24.

名前：仲根詩織、塩りんご（tiktok） 本名：非公開 誕生日：2000年11月05日 年齢：24歳（20205年4月時点） 出身地：千葉県 身長：162cm 体重：非公開 カップサイズ：fカップ スリーサイズ：b86 w57 h88 足のサイズ：24. @bellbee_nagoya by customer photoshoots ∩📷⊂. 24歳グラドル仲根詩織がビジネスサウナーだとぶっちゃけ「熱いの 身長も容疑者と同じ175センチ. 仲根詩織 nakane shiori （所属事務所：ヴィスカエンターテイメント株式会社） 仲根詩織 プロフィール 仲根詩織 生年月日 2000年11月05日 サイズ t162 b86 w57 h88. 仲根詩織 「1st impact ハイレグコーデ」 サンプル動画. Players 〜 プレイヤー 〜 hyper electra ハイパーエレクトラ.

이안 ㅇㅎ 2000年 11月5日 出身地 千葉県 a型身長162cm b80 w60 h88 靴24. 仲根詩織ナカネシオリ アピールポイント エクボと長い脚です！ プロフィール 出身地 千葉 職業 タレント 誕生日 2000115 身長・スリーサイズ. ：aircontrol（エアーコントロール）のハイレグフラッペ：仲根詩織 紹介 仲根詩織なかねしおり. 24歳グラドル仲根詩織がビジネスサウナーだとぶっちゃけ「熱いの 身長も容疑者と同じ175センチ. 1st impact ハイレグコーデ 仲根詩織. 이오 몽 수영복

이상원 성형 仲根詩織 「1st impact ハイレグコーデ」 サンプル動画. Jp › directory_detail仲根 詩織｜選手名鑑｜soft darts professional tour japan official. 仲根 詩織 psjapan公式アンバサダーミスセブン. 24歳グラドル仲根詩織がビジネスサウナーだとぶっちゃけ「熱いの 身長も容疑者と同じ175センチ. 名前：仲根詩織、塩りんご（tiktok） 本名： 誕生日：2000年11月05日 年齢：24歳（20205年4月時点） 出身地： 身長：162cm 体重： カップサイズ：fカップ. 이예빈 성형 디시

이시카와 미오 스타킹 Com › shioringo7131仲根詩織 shiori nakane @shioringo7131 instagram. Com › entertainment93塩りんご グラビアアイドルの本名や年齢は？カップサイズや身長など. 名前：仲根詩織、塩りんご（tiktok） 本名：非公開 誕生日：2000年11月05日 年齢：24歳（20205年4月時点） 出身地：千葉県 身長：162cm 体重：非公開 カップサイズ：fカップ スリーサイズ：b86 w57 h88 足のサイズ：24. スリーサイズ, b86・w57・h88 cm. 仲根詩織 nakane shiori （所属事務所：ヴィスカエンターテイメント株式会社） 仲根詩織 プロフィール 仲根詩織 生年月日 2000年11月05日 サイズ t162 b86 w57 h88. 이삼오구 디시

이터리 갤러리 プロフィール 出身地 千葉 職業 タレント 誕生日 2000115 身長・スリーサイズ 162cm b86 w57 h88 趣味 サウナと神社巡り 特技 変顔とバトミントン sns x 旧twitter） @shiooori_15 instagram @shioringo7131 tiktok @shioringo7131. 仲根詩織なかねしおり アイドル イメージビデオメーカー. 5cm 趣味：占い、サウナ、神社巡り、カフェ巡り、ドラマ鑑賞 特技：バドミントン sns. Jp › directory_detail仲根 詩織｜選手名鑑｜soft darts professional tour japan official. 仲根詩織のプロフィールページです。 利用規約 プライバシーポリシー 特定商取引 推奨環境 運営会社 faq コラボレーション リアルイベント お問い合わせ.

이사하야 유흥 名前：仲根詩織、塩りんご（tiktok） 本名：非公開 誕生日：2000年11月05日 年齢：24歳（20205年4月時点） 出身地：千葉県 身長：162cm 体重：非公開 カップサイズ：fカップ スリーサイズ：b86 w57 h88 足のサイズ：24. 仲根詩織、むっちり美ヒップあらわな競泳水着バックスタイル披露（wwsチャンネル）※画像は仲根詩織xより30日、モデルでグラドルの仲根詩織 身長195センチ！. 仲根詩織 「1st impact ハイレグコーデ」 サンプル動画. 24歳グラドル仲根詩織がビジネスサウナーだとぶっちゃけ「熱いの 身長も容疑者と同じ175センチ. スリーサイズ b 86cm w 57cm h 88cm.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.