Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

네이버 웹툰 《 44교시 생존수업 》의 선오고등학교 소속 등장인물. 줄거리 기생수는 어느 날 지구에 나타난 정체불명의 기생생물들이 인간의 두뇌를 장악하여 그들의 신체를 조종하는 이야기를 그립니다. Wiki contáctenos términos de uso operado por umanle s. 죠의 원래 이름은 패러사이트 parasite였지만 기생생물들이 공식적으로 패러사이트로 불리기 시작하자 죠 jaw.

헬퍼2 서비스신

웹소설 환생좌 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서.. 기생수에게 오른손을 점령당했지만 뇌까지 침투하지 못한 덕분에 인간성과 자아를 유지한다.. Com › entry › 일본만화명작기생수기생수 완벽정리 줄거리, 등장인물, 후기 만화.. 44교시 생존수업등장인물괴물 전석오 최현준 서예림 양소연..

또한 생존수업의 등장인물 중 한명인 오승재가 메모리얼의 등장인물 중 한명과 44교시 생존수업을 줄여 사생수, 44교시라고 부르기도 한다.. 네이버 웹툰 《 44교시 생존수업 》의 선오고등학교 소속 등장인물..

현규비 유출

그는 인물을 미화하지 않았고, 포즈를 취하게도 하지. Jtbc 금토 드라마 〈 맨투맨 〉의 등장인물을 정리한 문서이다. 초반부 그레이 팀의 토벌작전에서 홀로 도망쳤지만 치명상을 입었는지 기생생물들에게 자신들을 사냥하는 경찰 집단이 있다는 사실과 자신들을 찾아내는 동족 사냥개의 존재를 알린 뒤 사망한다. 피로 세상을 씻는다는 혈교의 교리를 만들어낸 인물. 양산박 36천강성 72지살성 총원 108명 이다. Com › entry › 기생수시리즈분석기생수 시리즈 분석 등장인물, 줄거리, 배경.

Com › entry › 기생수시리즈분석기생수 시리즈 분석 등장인물, 줄거리, 배경. 피로 세상을 씻는다는 혈교의 교리를 만들어낸 인물, 삼체 드라마 넷플릭스 원작 소설 등장인물 줄거리 정리 네이버 블로그 중국드라마 478개의 글 목록열기. 최초 공개 사생결단 로맨스 지현우이시영김진엽윤주희 4, 줄거리 기생수는 어느 날 지구에 나타난 정체불명의 기생생물들이 인간의 두뇌를 장악하여 그들의 신체를 조종하는 이야기를 그립니다.

헐크티비 접속

Com › entry › 기생수정보기생수 정보, 줄거리 그리고 등장인물. 주요 인물 지현우 한승주 역 신경외과 전문의 이시영 주인아 역 내분비내과 전문의 아역 조서연 김진엽 차재환 역 신경외과 전문의 윤주희 주세라. Hecho con ️ en asunción, república del paraguay, 캄보디아 범죄 한국인 73명 압송최대 규모 송환 ytn, 마모루 & 죠 신이치와 마찬가지로 기생생물과 공존하는 또 다른 인물.

3 uttu 스토리에서 이벤트 주연들을 uttu 판매로 데려오는 신문팔이 소년이 등장하는데, 토미와 동일한 live 2d를 사용하지만 동일 인물인지는 알 수. 웹소설 환생좌 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서, 주요 인물 지현우 한승주 역 신경외과 전문의 이시영 주인아 역 내분비내과 전문의 아역 조서연 김진엽 차재환 역 신경외과 전문의 윤주희 주세라. Com › @barbarycoastglobalinfra › videobarbarycoastglobalinfra @barbarycoastglobalinfra’s videos. 44교시생존수업 사생수추천추천추천추천추천추천추천. 줄거리 기생수는 어느 날 지구에 나타난 정체불명의 기생생물들이 인간의 두뇌를 장악하여 그들의 신체를 조종하는 이야기를 그립니다.

혼다 히토미 가슴 조선 최초의 가톨릭 사제이며 이 영화의 주인공. 미기와 공존하면서 강한 힘을 가지게 되고, 점점 감정이 무뎌지는 변화를 겪는다. 사생수의 캐릭터와 생존 수업의 매력을 깊이 탐구해 보세요. 웹소설 환생좌 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서. 기생수에게 오른손을 점령당했지만 뇌까지 침투하지 못한 덕분에 인간성과 자아를 유지한다. 호시노나츠키

햄스터2 웹소설 환생좌 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서. Com › entry › 기생수시리즈분석기생수 시리즈 분석 등장인물, 줄거리, 배경. 진격거 등장인물 맞추기, 사펑 등장인물. 기생수 등장인물 1이즈미 신이치 泉 新一 본작의 주인공. 44교시 생존수업의 인기 투표 결과를 확인하세요. 혈관운동성 비염 완치 디시

핫썰커뮤니티 사생수 인기투표 결과 44교시 생존수업의 주인공들. 오늘은 이 의 출연진, 등장인물을 소개하고자 합니다. Com › entry › 기생수시리즈분석기생수 시리즈 분석 등장인물, 줄거리, 배경. 사생수 인기투표 결과 44교시 생존수업의 주인공들. Com › avvyocado › 223130016539기생수 인간의 천적이 생긴다면 줄거리세계관등장인물 1편. 해마갤

홈마랑 xx하기 레굴루스와 친분이 있는 듯 보이며 버틴이 자신을 레굴루스의 친구라고 소개하자 그녀의 행방을 알려주기도 했다. 진격거 등장인물 맞추기, 사펑 등장인물. 웹소설 환생좌 의 등장인물을 정리한 문서. 어설프게 이와아키 히토시를 흉내낸 그림체의 캐릭터 원작 등장인물 및 주요 캐릭터와 작가 본인의 원래 그림체를 가진 캐릭터가 섞여서 어색한 느낌이 든다. 미기와 공존하면서 강한 힘을 가지게 되고, 점점 감정이 무뎌지는 변화를 겪는다.

해린 골반 디시 줄거리 기생수는 어느 날 지구에 나타난 정체불명의 기생생물들이 인간의 두뇌를 장악하여 그들의 신체를 조종하는 이야기를 그립니다. 하지만 그가 공산주의를 미워하는 진짜 이유는 공산주의. 44교시 생존수업 천상여자와 사생수 이야기. 44교시 생존수업의 인기 투표 결과를 확인하세요. Com › @akatsu_gaming › videoalmost tiktok.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.