Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

475 likes, tiktok video from dairelys @dairelysmarin 🖤. 잡담질문 kfc 업사이드다운 징거 다이어터한테 최고임 2,001 17 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 업사이드다운 징거버거 맛후기 핫딜 후기 채널. Kfc 업사이드다운징거 밥 마이너 갤러리.

Lck 치지직 디시

Korean Redgif

Korea Bj Pikpak

Kfc에서 넷플릭스 드라마 기묘한 이야기와 콜라보 제품을 선보였습니다.. 더구나, 기존 징거더블 다운 맥스는 닭가슴살 패티 두개 사이에 해쉬 브라운이 들어 있었잖아요.. 최근 kfc가 선보인 가장 ‘이세계 감성’ 메뉴..

Kuzu 韓国

애초에 기대감이 컸지만 실제로는 기대와 다른 부분이 있어 흥미로웠어요. Kfc x 기묘한 이야기 5 업사이드다운 징거 안녕하세요, 말괄량이갱이씨 입니다 짝꿍이 kfc에 특. 절대 삔또 상해서 단품만 달랑 시킨게 아니다. 근데 더블다운 단종시키고 이걸로 계속하겟다하면 개빡칠거같음. 안에는 뒤집힌 콘셉트의 신메뉴 버거, kfc 시그니처인 핫크리스피 통다리, 감자튀김 중간 사이즈, 탄산음료 m 이렇게 꽉 찬 조합으로 들어 있어.

더블다운이랑 다른 방향으로 맛있어서 하위호환 그런건 아닌듯, 포테이토&그레이비가 은근 모든 메뉴에 잘 어울려서 이거 단종되지않았으면 좋겠어요 kfc 업사이드다운 징거 버거 내돈내산 후기. Kfc 앱에서도 쿠폰 할인을 하고 배민에서도 특별 세트가 있고 할인 방법이 다양하니까 직접 매장가서 드시면 저렴한 가격으로 드실 수 있어요, 실제 맛 평가, 숨겨진 칼로리 정보, 그리고 가장 맛있게 즐기는 저만의 꿀팁까지 상세히 알려드립니다, 이색적인 신메뉴의 모든 것을 확인하세요. 채소도 없고 소스가 두가지나 들어가있지만 그래도 징거필렛의.

파격적인 비주얼로 화제가 된 징거버거의 새로운 변신, 과자, 빵 치킨패티사이에 빵을 끼운거뿐아님, Com › @dairelysmarin › videodairelys on tiktok. Kfc 마이너 갤러리 업사이드다운징거 후기. 파격적인 비주얼로 화제가 된 징거버거의 새로운 변신. 켑붕이들만을 위한 기묘한 업사이드다운징거 시식평 이벤트를 시작한다.

평소에 kfc를 즐겨 먹지는 않는 편이지만 먹을 때마다 느껴지는 그 특유의 기름지고 폭력적인 치킨 맛이 있다. 막 목매이거나 그런건 없는듯 진짜 기묘하네 ㄷㄷ, kfc 업사이드다운 징거 버거 가격은 8500원입니다, 이런건 해시브라운이 있어야하지 않나 섭섭함을 드러냈는데 의외로 맛있어서 당황했다.

kuzu流出 절대 삔또 상해서 단품만 달랑 시킨게 아니다. 기묘한이야기와 콜라보로 출시한 업사이드다운징거 충격적 비주얼에 눈을 의심함 패티와 빵이 뒤바뀌어버린 실존하는 햄거버 탄생 특이한 버거 못참지ㅋㅋㅋ 바로 도전하러 ㄱㄱ 어쨌든, 오늘 먹은 햄버거는 kfc 업사이드다운징거. Delivery menu 꿀조합파티팩 갓양념켄치밥징거팩 징거더블다운통다리박스 치즈징거통다리박스 징거blt박스 칠리징거통다리박스 징거타워박스 클래식징거통다리박스. 저번 1트때 방문 윗번 당첨2트는 조기중단된 이벤트 1회 참여로 운좋게 얻은단품 쿠폰 교환 포장해서 먹음사진은 못 남겼는데 아랫번 당첨 됨. 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 69개의 글 목록열기 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 kfc신메뉴 업사이드다운 징거세트 솔직후기 ft. korean 1818 porn

korea bj yako 최근 kfc가 선보인 가장 ‘이세계 감성’ 메뉴. 업사이드 다운 징거 마지막날 kfc 마이너 갤러리. 자, 이제 가장 중요한 맛 평가 시간입니다. Net › subdued20club › rehfkfc 업사이드다운징거 후기 악플달면 쩌리쩌려버려 ＊여성시대＊. Com › @tomate › videovideos de tomate sta @tomate. kuzu最新视频

kor_cat record 지랄하지말고 빨리 더블다운통다리 다시 내놔라징거더블다운통다리 단종시키고 냈다길래생긴거도 비슷해서 기대하고. 근데 더블다운 단종시키고 이걸로 계속하겟다하면 개빡칠거같음. 오늘 마지막이라길래 업사이드 다운 징거 먹으러옴빵은 아랫쪽 빵을 받았다갓튀라 맛있었다업사이드다운 단종 결사 반대. 징거가 553칼로리에 단백질 33g이거든. Sonido original abell moises. leezy 레전드

kuzu 164 Kfc 업사이드다운징거 페이티비 마이너 갤러리. kfc 업사이드다운 징거 버거 가격은 8500원입니다. 저번 1트때 방문 윗번 당첨2트는 조기중단된 이벤트 1회 참여로 운좋게 얻은단품 쿠폰 교환 포장해서 먹음사진은 못 남겼는데 아랫번 당첨 됨. Kfc 최고회사 업사이드다운징거 매장방문 다시 한 번. 지랄하지말고 빨리 더블다운통다리 다시 내놔라징거더블다운통다리 단종시키고 냈다길래생긴거도 비슷해서 기대하고.

kuzu 01 기묘한이야기라는 작품에는 현실 세계의 정반대 편에 괴물이 나오는 뒤집힌 세계가 있는데요. 이색적인 신메뉴의 모든 것을 확인하세요. 오늘 마지막이라길래 업사이드 다운 징거 먹으러옴빵은 아랫쪽 빵을 받았다갓튀라 맛있었다업사이드다운 단종 결사 반대. 이번에 소개할 버거는 기묘한이야기 5 홍보를 위해 나온 kfc의 업사이드다운 징거다. 징다맥은 치킨을 먹고 마지막에 느껴지는 감자튀김맛이 핵심이라고 보는데.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.