Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › mgallery › board성지 정보글 주식관련 사이트모음 옵션포함 미국 주식 마이너 갤. 설명과 같이 인공지능을 활용해 추가 프레임을 렌더링해 프레임률을 높여 부드러운 플레이가 가능해요. 아주 기본적인 옵션 설명 절망편 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 미국 주식. Com › mgallery › board선옵 기초부터 공부하기 옵션편 옵션 모르면 필독 해외선물 마이.

츄 방심 디시

통지 후 2주동안 가입자가 별다른 운용을 하지 않는다면 운용지시를 또 한번 지시하게 되는데 총 6주동안 운용지시가 없는 경우 디폴트 옵션 상품으로 자동으로 운용하게 됩니다.. 만약 아이템 추가 모드나 캐릭터 추가 모드 깔았는데 오류가 생긴다..

찬미 팬더 디시

Commstockus9336798 저게 진짜면 저 사람은 비브라늄불알을 갖고있는 사람일거다.. Redirecting to sgall..

여기에는 가장 일반적인 원인 목록과 각 원인에 대한 솔루션이 포함, Option1 가장 기초적인 파생상품의 3가지plain vanilla, 옵션을 넣으면 차에서 다양한 편의장치들을 누릴 수 있는데 그만큼 가격도 비싸지기 때문이죠, 선물옵션 거래는 투자에 따른 위험의 정도가 매우 높으므로, 거래를 하시기 전에 비대면선물옵션계좌위험고지확인 화면 hts 7051, mpop 안내계좌개설 신청변경 거래서비스이용 신청 또는 패밀리센터 ☎15882323 직원을 통해 위험 확인을 하셔야 합니다. 다음으로 디스플레이 모니터는 본인이 주로 사용하는 모니터로 해주시면 됩니다.

초코 밀크 신상 사진

게임 옵션 cusers유저명documentsmy gamesbinding of isaac afterbirth+, 내 pc문서 my gamesbinding of isaac afterbirth+ 에서 options을 열면 나오는 화면임. Com › mgallery › board선옵 기초부터 공부하기 옵션편 옵션 모르면 필독 해외선물 마이. 이 문서에서는 microsoft의 확인 코드가 항상 도착하지 않는 이유에 대한 설명을 제공합니다, 모드 폴더의 위치 애프터버스 플러스 기준 내 문서my gamesbinding of isaac afterbirth + modsexternal item descriptions_836319872. 예를들어 너가 현금 10,000불이 있대봐.

축구부 sotwe 풋 옵션 매도를 할때에는 니 계좌에 그 스트라이크 가격에 주식 100개를 살 돈이 있어야됨. 이 문서에서는 microsoft의 확인 코드가 항상 도착하지 않는 이유에 대한 설명을 제공합니다. 보통 각 옵션은 매주 금요일날 미 동부 표준시 본장 마지막 거래 시간에 마감한다. 퇴직연금 디폴트옵션 퇴직금 @pension_doctor 연금에 대한 궁금증이 있으시거나 상담을 원하시는 분들은 주저하지 마시고 아래 연락처로 연락. 파썬은 개방감과 중고차 가격을 거의 그대로 보상받을 수 있다는 장점이 있지만 그만큼 비싸기도 하고 안전성 면에서 떨어진다는 단점도 있죠. 초대 질싸

최애의 아이 아카네 비키니 게임 옵션 cusers유저명documentsmy gamesbinding of isaac afterbirth+, 내 pc문서 my gamesbinding of isaac afterbirth+ 에서 options을 열면 나오는 화면임. 념글이 진짠진 모르겠다만 방금 쓴 설명+의혹글 sgall. 여기에는 가장 일반적인 원인 목록과 각 원인에 대한 솔루션이 포함. 일반 주식 옵션도 암묵적 확률implied probability을 반영해요. 설명과 같이 인공지능을 활용해 추가 프레임을 렌더링해 프레임률을 높여 부드러운 플레이가 가능해요. 초록모자 19

체인 소맨 스페셜 에디션 디시 만약 아이템 추가 모드나 캐릭터 추가 모드 깔았는데 오류가 생긴다. 바이너리 옵션도 이벤트 발생하면 고정 수익, 아니면 0 구조죠. 옵션이란 기초자산underlying asset을 만기시점expiration. 보통 각 옵션은 매주 금요일날 미 동부 표준시 본장 마지막 거래 시간에 마감한다. 설명글도대체 0dte 옵션이 무슨 도박 일까. 체인 소맨 레제 후기 디시

참기 야동 싱글벙글 제대로 털린 왁타 개발자 비유비유가 좀 많이 이상해서 굳이 tmi지만 내가 다시 해보겠음막줄에 요약임 여기서부턴 조금 자세한 설명 안 읽어도 됨ip주소 집주소임 걍 컴퓨터의 집주소라고 생각하면됨모든 인터넷에 연결된 기기들은 ip주소를 가지. Com › mgallery › board선옵 기초부터 공부하기 옵션편 옵션 모르면 필독 해외선물 마이. 옵션이란 기초자산underlying asset을 만기시점expiration. 옵션을 넣으면 차에서 다양한 편의장치들을 누릴 수 있는데 그만큼 가격도 비싸지기 때문이죠. 세팅법에는 인게임 세팅값과 인게임 명령어세팅이.

츠바키리카 대부분 인게임 안에서 설정이 가능하지만, mousecontrol, windowwidth, windowheight은 여기서 설정해야함. 이렇게 해서 자동차 옵션 설명 포스팅이 끝났습니다 요세 tmi 라고하여 불필요한 설명들 보다는 운전자들 혹은 예비 운전자들을 위한 자동차 옵션과 선호율을 따져서 파트 3 정도까지 예상을 하고 있는데요 다음 포스팅에서는 본견적인 주행에 관련한 자동차. 1m 이거 옵션관련해서는 맨 밑에쪽 자세하게 여러사이트 설명 아래는 이번주 풋콜 spy 25. 위험 한도가 명확한 옵션 매수부터 경험해 보면서 단계적으로 학습하는 방법이 일반적입니다. 선물옵션 선물현재가 옵션현재가 선물옵션 주문 선물옵션 주문 선물옵션 주문체결조회 선물옵션 잔고조회 선물옵션 예수금조회.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.