Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

인도네시아 자카르타에서 족자카르타욕야카르타 가는법. 자카르타에서 욕야카르타까지 버스로 이동하는 방법을 확인해 보세요. 수백만 여행객의 후기를 확인하고, 욕야카르타의 인기 교통편을를 바로 예약하세요. 욕야카르타 국제 공항yia에서 10시 비행기인지라 족자 기차역에서 630분 기차를 타기로 예약을 했기에 숙소에서는 5시 50분 체크.

구둑 gudeg ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 욕야카르타의 상징적인 음식.. 버스로 이동할 때 티켓 가격은 us$12밖에 되지.. 욕야카르타 에서 말랑까지 이동 요금은 얼마인가요..

멩위욕야카르타 버스 예매 20€부터 omio 공식. 롬복, 길리, 트라왕안여행 14개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기, 보로부두르borobudur, 프람바난prambanan 같은 세계적인 문화유산과 함께 전통적인 예술과 공예, 미식이 조화를 이루는 곳입니다, 버스로 이동할 때 티켓 가격은 us$12밖에 되지.

Sone 975 Miss Av

욕야카르타말랑 노선은 매일 평균 5편의 버스가 있으며 평균 소요 시간은 약 7h 27m입니다. 2026 욕야카르타 인기 교통편 겟유어가이드, 보고르욕야카르타 버스 damri 최저 16€ 포함 모든 운행사, 스마랑 욕야카르타 구간 거리는 117km입니다.

욕야카르타 국제 공항yia에서 10시 비행기인지라 족자 기차역에서 630분 기차를 타기로 예약을 했기에 숙소에서는 5시 50분 체크.. 인도네시아여행 족자카르타여행 족자카르타일정 펭게르숲 펭게르소나무숲 족자카르타숲 족자카르타소나무숲 욕야카르타 pengger 족자카르타여행코스 바틱샵 바틱쇼핑 인도네시아전통의상 족자카르타전통의상 족자카르타바틱 댓글 33 인쇄.. 공항 근처에서 1박을 한 이유는, 우리의 첫 목적지가 이곳 자카르타가 아닌, 자바섬 동부에 있는 욕야카르타또는 족자카르타이기 때문이다..

Somisoft

Getyourguide는 최저가와 환불을 보장합니다. 편도 및 왕복 최저가 항공권을 여기에서 찾아보세요. 익스피디아에서 가장 저렴한 욕야카르타행 항공권을 온라인에서 24시간 즉시 검색, 예약, 결제가 가능합니다.

흔한 버스 유형은 에어컨 미설치, 에어컨 설치, 프리미엄, , 요금은 us$ 10부터 시작됩니다. 욕야카르타 출발 우노소보 행 버스는 안전하고, 편안하며, 저렴합니다. 자카르타에서 욕야카르타까지 버스기차로 가면 8시간 정도 걸릴 거예요, 욕야카르타에서 자카르타까지 버스로 약 1012시간 소요, 항공기차보다 3050% 저렴한 실속 노선. 카테고리 이동 테디의 세계여행 시내에서 북서쪽으로 40킬로, 차로 한시간정도 소요 trans jogja 버스 1a번 혹은 2b번 타기 3600루피아300원 정도.

저렴한 욕야카르타 특별주 욕야카르타행 항공권을 검색하고 욕야카르타 비행기표를 예약하세요. 가장 빠른 방법은 운전으로 4¼시간이 소요됩니다. 수백만 여행객의 후기를 확인하고, 욕야카르타의 인기 공항 교통편을를 바로 예약하세요.

18개의 서로 다른 공항에서 운항되는 항공편을 탐색하고 새로운 비행노선을 발견, 가장 빠른 버스는 6h 35m에 232 km의 거리를 운항합니다. 가장 빠른 버스는 6h 35m에 232 km의 거리를 운항합니다, 자카르타에서 비행기를 타고 가기로 했어요.

욕야카르타마제낭 버스 예매 20€부터 omio 공식, 욕야카르타 대표 미식 리스트 🥢 욕야카르타 음식은 대체로 달콤한 맛이 특징이에요, indonesia 자카르타에서 욕야카르타족자 시내까지 이동방법 경로 trans nusa항공 탑승후기 글 사진 ｜, 차 없이 스마랑에서 욕야카르타까지 어떻게 이동하나요, 수하물 규정, 이그제큐티브 버스 편의시설, 출발 간격, 도심 하차 정보를 정리했습니다.

롬복, 길리, 트라왕안여행 14개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기. 문제는 버스기차 시간표나 다른 정보를 찾을 수가 없다는 거야, 욕야카르타발 수라바야행 기차, 버스 및 비행을를 예약하세요. 5에서 파당까지 가는 방법은 욕야카르타가지가 있습니다.

Sone 994 English

욕야카르타발 수라바야행 기차, 버스, 비행 티켓 $6부터, 가장 빠른 방법은 운전으로 2¾시간이 소요됩니다, 욕야카르타 국제 공항yia에서 10시 비행기인지라 족자 기차역에서 630분 기차를 타기로 예약을 했기에 숙소에서는 5시 50분 체크, 선택한 여행 방법에 따라 다음과 같은 편의 시설이 제공됩니다, 족자카르타 가는 이유는 유네스코가 세계 7대 불가사의로 지정, 세계 3대 불교유적지인 보로부두르 불교사원, 그리고 세계 문화유산인 프람바난 힌두사원을 보기 위함.

sotwe 룸카페 욕야카르타 대표 미식 리스트 🥢 욕야카르타 음식은 대체로 달콤한 맛이 특징이에요. Com › ilyharu › 223574803828자카르타에서 욕야카르타 족자 시내까지 이동방법 경로 trans nusa. 욕야카르타 국제 공항yia에서 10시 비행기인지라 족자 기차역에서 630분 기차를 타기로 예약을 했기에 숙소에서는 5시 50분 체크. 지금 바로 12go에서 티켓을 예약하세요. 족자카르타에서 말랑 기차이동하기 말랑에서 족자카르타 욕야카르타 인도네시아 여행을 하면서 가장 시. sotwe直男

spankbang 아이돌 가장 빠른 방법은 운전으로 2¾시간이 소요됩니다. 이번 글에서는 욕야카르타에서 꼭 가봐야 할. 욕야카르타발 수라바야행 기차, 버스 및 비행을를 예약하세요. 인기 목적지의 경우 버스 회사에서 하루에 여러 번 3060분 간격으로 버스를 운행하는 경우가 많습니다. 인도네시아 자카르타에서 족자카르타욕야카르타 가는법. sleeping 히토미

sotwe 리트 가장 저렴한 방법은 철도이며, 요금은 rp44779입니다. 롬복, 길리, 트라왕안여행 14개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기. 공항 도심에서 약 6km 떨어진 아디숫집토 adisutjipto 공항 jog과 도심에서 남서쪽으로 약 45km 떨어진 욕야카르타 국제공항 yia이 있습니다. 가장 빠른 방법은 운전으로 49분이 소요됩니다. 브로모화산 등반을 위한 베이스캠프는 보통 프로보링고 probolinggo, 말랑 malang, 수라바야 surabaya. sotwe gay remaja sex

south korea xvideo 브로모화산 등반을 위한 베이스캠프는 보통 프로보링고 probolinggo, 말랑 malang, 수라바야 surabaya. 가장 저렴한 방법은 버스이며, 요금은 rp186001입니다. 😁 수카르노하타 국제공항 자카르타 에서 아디스킵토 국제공항 족자 까지는 1시간 30분. 버스에 대한 욕야카르타에서 바 뉴왕이까지의 사실. 5에서 ponorogo까지 가는 방법은 욕야카르타가지가 있습니다.

spankbang 3 대중교통 욕야카르타에는 버스, 기차, 택시, 베짝 페디캡, 오젝 오토바이 택시 등 다양한 종류의 대중교통이 있습니다. 자카르타에서 욕야카르타까지 버스로 안전하고, 편안하며 저렴하게 이동해 보세요. 가장 저렴한 방법은 버스 및 철도이며, 요금은 rp98578입니다. Getyourguide는 최저가와 환불을 보장합니다. 버스에 대한 욕야카르타에서 바 뉴왕이까지의 사실.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.