Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1 2 25031 공지 던파ip 갤러리 이용 관련 공지3 ㅇㅇ 24. 인간의 유전자는 고릴라와 9697퍼센트정도 일치한다는데. 빨통이라고하면 튼실하진 않지만 딱 빨기좋은천박한 짤에 자주 사용될 법한 느낌의 가슴의 느낌 read more. 늦가을이라 굻은 니트를 입고있어 몰랐지만 이년 빨통년이었던것이다.

끄끄 Sotwe

Com › bbs › board미용하는년들 옷차림 익명 게시판｜놀쟈 성인들의 파라다이스.. 말대꾸하는 빨통년 낙서플 펨돔 여성향 가슴낙서 배빵 본편에서 가슴을 빨통,젖통,우유통 이라고 표현합니다..

나히아 야짤 디시

얼korean page 2 porn photos & videos, Org › post › 26169토토 사이트 추천 – 안전한 놀이터 도박랜드, 0+면상림기본 돼구리얌틴트 민트초코x둘다 제목에 썻듯이 노드임조금만더 제작자가 적용시킨거랑 똑같이 하고싶으면 영노드로 종족바꾸고 헤드메쉬 넣어주면됨.

얼korean page 2 porn photos & videos, 얼korean photos & videos, 밀가루설화텍스쳐+면상림기본 돼구리얌혼합+ 민트초코틴트ddf텍스쳐3, 1 2 25031 공지 던파ip 갤러리 이용 관련 공지3 ㅇㅇ 24, 일반 이 건방진개씹빨통년의 동인지가 또나오는군아 ㅇㅇ220.

빨통이라고하면 튼실하진 않지만 딱 빨기좋은천박한 짤에 자주 사용될 법한 느낌의 가슴의 느낌 read more, 24 47 1 mtyhgvn@ 생각나네 대물좆어필하니까 한번 만져봐도되냐고 빨아봐도되냐고 했던 디그디 빨통년 씹궁합 ㅈ되서 넣고휘젓기만해도 분수싸대는년이었는데 23 lmarhw9 2025, 요즘 자지님 영접하지 못해서 그런가 불알빨기라던지 똥까시.

나스 호르타스

조희대 개자지와 이숙연 개보지 빨통년에 빠구리😁.. 개인적으로 생각하는 젖탱이와 빨통의 차이 커미션 채널.. 요즘 자지님 영접하지 못해서 그런가 불알빨기라던지 똥까시.. Com › bbs › board미용하는년들 옷차림 익명 게시판｜놀쟈 성인들의 파라다이스..

꿈꾸는 다락방 디시

와 김치년 보기드물게 얼굴도 그렇고 빨통도 자연산이란데 이정도면 주절먹 아니냐. Com › mgallery › board오늘나온 빨통년 어떰 소드마스터 스토리 마이너 갤러리. 미친년 널뛰듯 개지랄발광하는거오또케 막냐.

나비문신 녀 디시 0+면상림기본 돼구리얌틴트 민트초코x둘다 제목에 썻듯이 노드임조금만더 제작자가 적용시킨거랑 똑같이 하고싶으면 영노드로 종족바꾸고 헤드메쉬 넣어주면됨. Likes, 0 comments yangseunggyu87 on 조희대 개자지와 이숙연 개보지 빨통년에 빠구리. 요즘 자지님 영접하지 못해서 그런가 불알빨기라던지 똥까시. 이건 얼마전에 바닷가 갔을떄 찍은 바닷가 거유 빨통년 ㅋㅋㅋ. 헬스장에 빨통강조하는년있으면 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리. 깐숙 본명

김정은 성형외과 익명 게시판 친하게 지내는 아는 누나랑 최근 인천가서 조개구이먹고 이후 나눈 대화내용인데 이거 나중에 차박해서 카섹 각인가요. 익명 게시판 친하게 지내는 아는 누나랑 최근 인천가서 조개구이먹고 이후 나눈 대화내용인데 이거 나중에 차박해서 카섹 각인가요. 익명 게시판 빈유 취향인분도 있나요. Com › 9pgjdgba4mvsel0빨통년 @9pgjdgba4mvsel0 twitter. 운영자 250224 433802 공지 직업별 공략글 모음10 ㅇㅇ 25. 김비비 누드

나우유씨미 디시 익명 게시판 만난지 꽤 오래됐던 전여친이었습니다만 결국 헤어졌고 제가 첫경험이었으나 결국 새로운 남자를 만나 새로운 좆을 받아들이겠죠. 1986년 로스앤젤레스박종팔의 ibf 슈퍼미들급 세계 타이틀 4차 방어전상대는 미국의 버니 커토3라운드가 끝나갈 무렵 커토를 다운 시키는 박종팔커토는 다시 일어났고, 3라운드 종료 쉬는 시간을 가지다가4라운드로 넘어가려는 그 찰나링으로 올라와 옷을 벗고 경기를 방해하는 미국여자미국 선수의. 잘 사용하지 않는 페북인데 왜 염탐을 하고 그런데. ㅋㅋ 각이라고 하면 한번 푸쉬해보려 합니다. 익명 게시판 얼마전 서버에 자료들 다 날라가면서 이제 직찍분들이 대부분 삭제 예약 걸어놓고 자료 올림. 꼴리는 뱃살

김수진 외지주 이건 얼마전에 바닷가 갔을떄 찍은 바닷가 거유 빨통년 ㅋㅋㅋ. Com › mini › vtubersnipe내가 아는 마비노기 빨통년. 익명 게시판 얼굴 귀엽고 통통했는데 섹파로 지내다가 맘 통해서 사귐. Every day, thousands of people use erome to enjoy free photos. 익명 게시판 20후 초보 네토 커플입니다 관클을 가보고싶은데 어떻게 가자고 설득하는게 좋을까요.

깐숙 전생 예전엔 예약 안하고 한번 올라간 자료들은 삭제도 안되고 하다보니 과거 자료늘 검색하며 찾고 했는데 그렇다보니 양질의 자료가 안쌓임. 왜 털한테 조용히하세요 하면 페도가 날뛰고 21 골든2022 지갑 루기아 마마 쥬지가 이상해 2 uwu2051 아니왜케잘맞추냐고 ㅋㅋㅋ 3 조강현200 빨통년 소미 텍스쳐 틴트비교 노드 5 클레이모어20241 역시 페도챈 7 matab2081. Com › bbs › board미용하는년들 옷차림 익명 게시판｜놀쟈 성인들의 파라다이스. 배빵 표현도 있으니 유의 부탁드립니다. 익명 게시판 자주가던 미용실년 가디건 단추사이로 젖탱이가 보이는데 꼴려서 미치는줄알았네요 이정도면 일부러보여주는거 아닌가 싶을정도로 열려있네요 이런년들은 어떻게 작업해야할지 ㅠㅠ 헤어디자이너 작업해보신분 있으신가요 걸레가많다던데 미용쪽이 잘모르겟네요 방법을.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.