Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

정말로 투자할 가치가 있는 제품이라고 생각해요. 어제 cos 퀼팅백 이어서 오늘은 리얼 내돈내산 후기 보여드리고자 합니다. 플레어한 라인의 우아한 실루엣이 돋보였죠. 정말로 투자할 가치가 있는 제품이라고 생각해요.

1rin_ee

Com › 30364 › 223673966306김지원 듀베티카 여자패딩, 더현대서울 팝업에서 입어본 후기. 네이버 블로그 뷰티,패션 54개의 글 목록열기. 자세히 보면 일반 트레이닝복에 고어텍스 기능이 추가되며 특히, 바지에는 허리끈 대신 허리벨트를 착용할 수 있도록 설계되어 있어 등산, 낚시, 골프, 야구, 당구 등.

1hsdab00004 Missav

에프앤에프에 따르면 올 연말까지 듀베티카 오프라인 매장 14곳을 신규 운영할 예정이다. 다양한 듀베티카 women 제품을 공식 온라인몰에서 만나보세요. Com › search듀베티카 패딩 추천인기 상품, ssg, 프롤로그 블로그 화장품 리뷰 ootd 텔라룩 체크인 여행 텔라일상 안부. Kr › display › dvmb01듀베티카 공식 온라인몰 women.

디테일이 만드는 스타일 fashion 889개의 글 목록열기.. 중국에서 생산하는데 뭔 프리미엄이야 이제 메이드인 차이나를 120만원에 살라고.. 내돈내산 듀베티카 패딩후기 몽클레어보다 만족..

3121790 女優

그럼 이번 포스팅에서는 기은세 님이 착용한 듀베티카 패딩 3종을 소개해 볼게요. 출처_듀베티카 홈페이지 제가 듀베티카를 작년에 구매 했지만, 꾸준히 좋아하는 이유가 있습니다, 네이버 블로그 뷰티,패션 54개의 글 목록열기. 듀베티카 패딩은 단순한 방한용 아우터를 넘어 스타일과 기능을 모두 충족시키는 브랜드다 듀베티카 남자패딩은 세련된 실루엣과 높은 보온성으로 완벽한 겨울 패션을 완성하고, 듀베티카 패딩 사이즈만 잘 맞춘다면 누구나 자연스러운 핏을 연출할 수 있다. 듀베티카 미데나 패딩은 페플럼 경량 패딩 자켓이에요, 허술한 쇼핑 102개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기.

4360403 어제 cos 퀼팅백 이어서 오늘은 리얼 내돈내산 후기 보여드리고자 합니다. No more difficult proxy purchase on your way. Com › 두베디카듀베티카 패딩 후기로 알아보는 가격과 아울렛 매장 총정리 천안교. 듀베티카는 그리도 라이징 명품이라 100만원은 넘음 ㅋㅋ 2025. 네이버 블로그 뷰티,패션 54개의 글 목록열기. 12yo pikpak

1855975 jav 정말로 투자할 가치가 있는 제품이라고 생각해요. 이 블로그의 체크인 이 장소의 다른 글 듀베티카 듀베티카패딩 리베디카패딩 겨울패딩추천여성패딩 경량패딩 패딩코디 듀베티카착용샷가벼운패딩 고급진패딩 패딩후기 쇼핑후기 아울렛득템 김포현대아울렛 패딩추천 데일리패딩. 양쪽 주머니에 지퍼 디테일이 있습니다. 듀베티카 패딩좀 봐줘 남자패션 마이너 갤러리. 출시가778,800원 최종할인가500,000원 할인율35%. 28 years later 전체 영화 무료 다운로드

2917528 hitomi 이번에 처음으로 듀베티카 패딩을 입어봤는데, 생각보다 너무 만족스러웠어요💚 가볍고 따뜻하면서도 핏이 예뻐서 앞으로도 듀베티카 제품을 구매할 것 같아요 라인이 예쁘게 떨어지고, 실용성도 좋아서 정말 만족하는 패딩이예요. 16k likes, 320 comments dispatch_style on novem 광고 배우 김지원이 27일 더현대 서울 듀베티카 팝업스토어를 방문했습니다. Condition a 듀베티카 프리미엄 패딩입니다 소매 사용감 제외하면 매우 좋은 컨디션 size 총장71 가슴단면54 소매64. 출처_듀베티카 홈페이지 제가 듀베티카를 작년에 구매 했지만, 꾸준히 좋아하는 이유가 있습니다. 듀베티카는 이탈리아에서 설립된 프리미엄 패딩 브랜드입니다. 203号の隣人は鍵束一つ残して消えた。 hitomi

3차 동료 핫딜 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이탈리아에서 팔았을때나 이태리브랜드라고 프리미엄붙인거지 read more. 무난한 색상이라 어느 옷에도 잘 어울립니다. 출처_듀베티카 홈페이지 제가 듀베티카를 작년에 구매 했지만, 꾸준히 좋아하는 이유가 있습니다. Enjoy exclusive kpop merch and fashion items for international shoppers. 정품 듀베티카 여성 카로마 후드 경량 숏다운 재킷 vddj95735bks 기본가 320,000원 할인율 7% 판매가 297,600원.

314_514_414 porn 허술한 쇼핑 102개의 글 목록닫기 5줄 보기. 프롤로그 블로그 안부 패션 12개의 글 목록열기. 저는 10월이 시작되면서 슬슬 발 빠르게 겨울옷에도 관심을 갖고 있는데요 최근에는 올해는 꼭 입문해야지. 아우터, 상의, 하의 등을 추천합니다. 가을 패션 코디 뉴뉴웨어로 스타일링하기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.