Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 일반 20252026시즌 한국도로공사 신인선수 등록 도갤러211. 원정팀분석 한국도로공사 하이패스 배구단 한국도로공사 하이패스 배구단는 최근 연승을 기록하며 리그 선두다운 안정적인 경기력 을 과시하고 있습니다. 30금 역대통산 디그성공 4000개를 달성한 문정원 선수에게 축하의 메세지를 남겨주세요.

Bigbaebee23

295 likes, 10 comments hipassvolleyclub on janu jinair 20252026 v리그 matchday 20252026 정규리그 5r ibk기업은행 2026.. 🛣️한국도로공사 하이패스 배구단 since 1970 공식 youtube 채널🛣️🏆 v1 20172018 통합 우승🏆 v2 20222023 챔피언결정전 우승..

Bj푸딩 누드

Bravoyeji Kbj

도로공사 배구단은 잘나가는데, 전새얀의 자리는 사라졌다 네이버 블로그 배구 898개의 글 목록열기, Pages 󱙿 businesses 󱙿 sports & recreation 󱙿 sports team 󱙿 kgc 인삼공사 프로배구단 󱙿 videos 󱙿 최서현이 울컥한 롤모델의 조언. 여자배구를 좋아하는 사람들의 갤러리입니다.

Bj미래 Naked

도로공사 배구단은 잘나가는데, 전새얀의 자리는 사라졌다 네이버 블로그 배구 898개의 글 목록열기.. 도로공사배구단 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨.. 여자부는 현대건설 강성형 감독이 맡게 된다.. 그리고 2018 보령 한국도로공사컵대회에서 데뷔 경기를 가졌다..

Bandage77

고닉, 반고닉을 이용하시면 아이피 상관없는 편안한 갤질을 하실 수 있습니다. Pages 󱙿 businesses 󱙿 sports & recreation 󱙿 sports team 󱙿 kgc 인삼공사 프로배구단 󱙿 videos 󱙿 최서현이 울컥한 롤모델의 조언, 30금 1900 ☑️ 한국도로공사 하이패스 0 3 ibk기업은행 응원해주신 팬 여러분 감사합니다 ＊사진출처 kovo 한국도로공사 한국도로공사배구단 김천한국도로공사 korea_expressway 여자배구, Com › hipassvolleyclub한국도로공사 하이패스 배구단 @hipassvolleyclub instagram phot. 이러한 운명을 타고난 이유는 바로 모기업인 한국도로공사 에 있다. Com › mgallery › board근데 오래쉰 도공 너무 무서워 도로공사배구단 마이너 갤러리.

Com dc official app nft 발행하기 2 0, 30 금 1900 📌 화성종합경기타운 실내체육관 📺 sbs sports, naver 경기예고 match_day 5round 기업은행알토스 ibk알토스 여자배구 배구 ibk기업은행, 맨날 결정 안나서 꾸역꾸역 수비로 끈질기게 점수나는게 도공컬러긴 했지만 올해처럼 공격수들 다 해결력있어서 빵빵 때리는 배구도 또 그 재미가 있네 너무 좋다 dc official app. ＊사진출처 kovo 한국도로공사 한국도로공사배구단 김천한국도로공사 korea_expressway.

bj민키 30금 1900 ☑️ 한국도로공사 하이패스 0 3 ibk기업은행 응원해주신 팬 여러분 감사합니다 ＊사진출처 kovo 한국도로공사 한국도로공사배구단 김천한국도로공사 korea_expressway 여자배구. 2018년 gs칼텍스 서울 kixx의 정식선수로 등록되었다. Gimcheon korea expressway corporation hipass korean 김천 한국도로공사 하이패스 is a south korean professional womens volleyball team. Com › channel › ucvimdvlsm6thps8ixu6gwyg한국도로공사 하이패스 배구단 youtube. 일반 20252026시즌 한국도로공사 신인선수 등록 도갤러211. blackeromaster pikpak

bj 순우유 팬방 1970년 gs칼텍스 배구단의 옛 이름인 호남정유 배구단으로 창단했다. Pages 󱙿 businesses 󱙿 sports & recreation 󱙿 sports team 󱙿 kgc 인삼공사 프로배구단 󱙿 videos 󱙿 최서현이 울컥한 롤모델의 조언. 1970년 gs칼텍스 배구단의 옛 이름인 호남정유 배구단으로 창단했다. 여자배구 도로공사 하이패스구단소속 문정원선수를 응원합니다 문정원 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 경북김천 한국도로공사 배구단을 응원하는 사람들이 모인 공간입니다. bj상쾌하이 오토바이춤

bj지인 야동 배구황제 김연경, 춘천에서도 숨은 올스타로 강렬한 존재감 v. 부산시시장 박형준는 26일부터 내성교차로와 중동을 잇는 간선급행버스brt 구간에서 자율주행버스 심야 여객운송 서비스를 시작한다고 밝혔다. 현재 좋은 성적으로 리그1위를 달리고 있는 한국도로공사여자배구단의 돌풍 이유에 대해 알아보았습니다 올시즌 한국도로공사 연승을 저지할 팀은 페퍼저축은행. V스타 남자부는 kb손해보험 하현용 감독대행이 이끌며 여자부는 한국도로공사 김종민 감독이 지휘한다. Their home arena is gimcheon gymnasium in gimcheon. bj 노아

bj 푸딩 보지노출 고닉, 반고닉을 이용하시면 아이피 상관없는 편안한 갤질을 하실 수 있습니다. 한국도로공사 배구단 공식 팬카페입니다. 한국도로공사는 지난 24일 김천 실내체육관에서 열린 도드람 20242025 v리그 여자부 경기에서 세트 스코어 30 완승 m. 도로공사 배구단은 잘나가는데, 전새얀의 자리는 사라졌다 네이버 블로그 배구 898개의 글 목록열기. 이러한 운명을 타고난 이유는 바로 모기업인 한국도로공사 에 있다.

bedlam_mm 공기업이기 때문에 사기업 구단에게 늘 스카우트 경쟁에서 밀릴 수밖에 없었다. ＊사진출처 kovo 한국도로공사 한국도로공사배구단 김천한국도로공사 korea_expressway. 도로공사 배구단 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 도로공사배구단 갤러리에 문정원 마이너 갤러리. 한국도로공사 배구단 워크샵 현장 스케치 비치발리볼 두 번째로 찾아온 현장 스케치 영상은 바로 비치발리볼.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.