Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Faker vs 프로야구 연봉 프로게임단은 어떻게 돈을 벌까. 개요 편집 2022 lol champions korea spring 2라운드 6주차 52경기 t1 과 dwg kia 의 2세트 경기에서 페이커 선수가 사운드 이슈로 인해 퍼즈를 요청했음에도 이에 대한 lck 심판진의 미숙한 대처와 규정 미숙지 운영 등으로 인해 불거진 논란이다. 10 결국엔 한상용 코치의 사과 트윗으로 사건은 어느 정도 일단락 되었고, 이후 스타리그 조지명식 등을 거치며 스1과 스2 팬, 협회와 연맹간의 대립이 흥행의 연료로 긍정적으로 전환되어 가는 분위기이다. 48k views 3 years ago.

Net › leagueoflegends › 1801120696더쿠 한상용 페이커 전문 가져옴.. 그래서 내가 혹시 못나가더라도 응원해줬으면 좋겠다..

목까시 Twitter

며며 레전드 디시

우승했지만 나는 세체미가 아니라고 생각한다.. Com › 3322839794윙드,한상용 발언 전문 써왔음.. 페이커 선수가 나는 당연히 주전경쟁 열심히 할거고 최고의 자리에 서기위해 노력할 것이다..

메랜디코 주소

그렇지만 내 후계자로 지금 클로저 선수를 키우고 있다. 롤챔스 한상용 진에어 감독, 페이커는 좋은 선수1, 4세트, 롤이 미드 게임인건 유일 역체롤인 페이커가 이미 증명한 거라서 거의 반박의 여지가 없긴 합니다. 어떤 인터뷰냐면 지금 팀에 얘기가 많이 나오잖아, 22 2236 한상용조마쉬 작년에도 페이커 재계약 성공하고 내 방송오고 그랬다. 한상용 옹호해도 좋고 비아냥대는거도 자유지 ㅇㅇ 정도를 넘지 않는 선이어야겠지만 다만 용서한다고 용서하는 쪽에 개돼지라 할 필요도 없고 용서안한다고 용서안한다는 쪽에 이악물고까네 ㅉㅉ 이럴 필요도 없을 뿐 조버로우9 2022.

모노사파 디시 좆시케이 관계자놈들 생각하면 2 qiya 2023. 10 결국엔 한상용 코치의 사과 트윗으로 사건은 어느 정도 일단락 되었고, 이후 스타리그 조지명식 등을 거치며 스1과 스2 팬, 협회와 연맹간의 대립이 흥행의 연료로 긍정적으로 전환되어 가는 분위기이다. 어제 한상용, 노페, 윙드 셋이서 t1에 대한 평가를 내렸는데 한상용의 발언에 많은 불만을 느꼈나봅니다. Videos popular videos lck 리뷰 용과 함께. 한상용 사실 언젠가는 e스포츠 관련 책을 써야겠다고 생각. 메이플 누드

무료 di 한게임 3 63 lec 근데 개좆투든 씹나틱이든 둘다 경기력은 패자조가 진짜임 브로큰블레이드 2022. 그래서 내가 페이커 선수 정말 아끼고 또 좋아하는 마음으로 얘기하면은 페이커 선수가 나는 인터뷰를 한 번 해줬으면 좋겠어. 3 63 lec 근데 개좆투든 씹나틱이든 둘다 경기력은 패자조가 진짜임 브로큰블레이드 2022. 방금 한상용 발언 전문 그대로 적어봄. 한상용 피셜 페이커재계약 희망적 트윗에 하나 남겼다가 삭제한 것도 그렇고 재계약 협상이 잘 돼가고 있나 보네요. 무선 연결 오 나홀로 뉴 토끼

명조 엔드 필드 디시 전 진에어 감독 한상용, 전 진에어 선수 윙드, 전 락스, 한화, edg 감코진 출신 정노철노페의 t1평가에 대해서 이야기해보겠습니다. 조합이 누가 나올지 궁금하다 일주일 전까지 엔트리 못정했. 어떤 인터뷰냐면 지금 팀에 얘기가 많이 나오잖아. 어떤 인터뷰냐면 지금 팀에 얘기가 많이 나오잖아. 한상용 피셜 페이커재계약 희망적 mania. 메이플 오 본명

메이플 키우기 동료 티어 표 페이커 선수가 나는 인터뷰를 한 번 해줬으면 좋겠어. 페이커 패싱 여론과는 별개로 한상용은 어찌됐건 과거의 잘못에 대해 재차 사과하는 모습을 보였고, 유투브 댓글 역시 삭제하기 전까지 수익성을 위한 쇼냐고 노골적으로. 방금 올라온 영상 정리 한상용 사과 카톡 페이커 답장 내용. 예전에 방송에서 이런말 했다는데, 양소인이 한참 돌림판 돌릴때였다네요. Lol한상용 페이커 관련해서 사과방송했네요.

무 이치로 성별 한상용 e스포츠과 교수는 학생들에게 경기 흐름과 게임에 사용된 챔피언 캐릭터을 분석해 설명해봐라, 왜 이 캐릭터 말고 다른 캐릭터를 사용했다고 생각하나 등을 물었다. 22 0450 lck 공식 시즌전 프리뷰에서 페이커보고 자신을 증명하라고 하는걸 내보낼때부터 쌔했는데 결국 아니고에 강력권고 까지 진짜 페이커가 21을 제일 힘들었다고 말할만함 1. 페이커 패싱 여론과는 별개로 한상용은 어찌됐건 과거의 잘못에 대해 재차 사과하는 모습을 보였고, 유투브 댓글 역시 삭제하기 전까지 수익성을 위한 쇼냐고 노골적으로. 클로저 밀어줘라 발언에 비호였는데 올해 한상용 책 낸거 표지에 페이커 박혀있는거 보고 개인적으로 난 비호감임 물론 스토브에선 궁금하니까 보긴하는데. 조금 더 친했으면 카톡으로 했을텐데 페이커가 클로저 위해서 인터뷰도 해주고, 믿고 응원한다 해주면.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.