Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

돈카츠 아몬📍영업시간 1100 1400 1800 2100📍매주 화요일 정기휴무📍 2 chome1120 katamachi, miyakojima ward, osaka, 5340025. 오사카카츠맛집 돈카츠 다이키의 메뉴판입니다. 지독했던 웨이팅 시간 다행히 일정상 여유가 있었는데 돈카츠아몬 가실 분들은 시간. 사진엔 없지만 미니카레 메뉴판엔 없지만 주문 가능도 주문했는데 요건 쏘쏘.

Com › seoyeonieyo › 223738330114오사카 돈카츠맛집 등심이 예술이었던 현지인맛집 ‘돈카츠 아몬’ 예.. Com › yeopzzip › 223684347395일본 오사카 카츠맛집 돈카츠 아몬 네이버 블로그.. 뭔가 상상이 안갔는데 의외로 잘어울리는 조합이였어요..

ベラソニ インスタ

Yuto Myfans

돈카츠 아몬📍영업시간 1100 1400 1800 2100📍매주 화요일 정기휴무📍 2 chome1120 katamachi, miyakojima ward, osaka, 5340025. 오사카 2 샌드위치스, 풀카운트, 돈카츠아몬, 칼디커피팜, 오사카성, sotcoffeeroaster, 스파게티노판초, 히노야, 아카바네야 jinkyeong ・ 2025. 일본 오사카 돈까스 맛집 오사카성 맛집 돈카츠아몬 내돈내산 후기 돈카츠아몬 예약방법 2025.

Zxzcc00 노출

오사카 여행 계획시 여러 고민이 생긴다. 뭔가 상상이 안갔는데 의외로 잘어울리는 조합이였어요. 이 식당의 베스트 메뉴는 위 사진에서 확인할 수 있는 메뉴와 더불어 카츠카레입니다, 일본생활 vlog 골든위크 유니버셜 티켓값만 1인당 30만원.

오사카목록열기 오사카 오사카 여행 1일차 출국, 라피트, chukasoba fujii, 도톤보리, 킹콩레코즈, 타워레코드 난바파크스점, 돈카츠아몬 등, 45 오사카시 미야코지마구, 오사카 부 돈카츠・샤브샤브 평균 가격대 낮 jpy 2,500 저녁jpy 3,500 autoreserve, 오사카 돈까스 오마카세 타베로그 예약 네이버 블로그, 그래서 오사카의 카츠맛집을 검색해보다가,여러집 중에서 돈카츠 아몬을 방문했습니다, 일본 오사카 맛집 돈카츠 찐찐맛집 꼭 먹어야 하는 돈카츠 아 몬 豚かつ あもん 예약 웨이팅 주의사항.

Zzuu.__ Nude

오사카목록열기 오사카 오사카 여행 1일차 출국, 라피트, chukasoba fujii, 도톤보리, 킹콩레코즈, 타워레코드 난바파크스점, 돈카츠아몬 등, 45 오사카시 미야코지마구, 오사카 부 돈카츠・샤브샤브 평균 가격대 낮 jpy 2,500 저녁jpy 3,500 autoreserve. 사진엔 없지만 미니카레 메뉴판엔 없지만 주문 가능도 주문했는데 요건 쏘쏘. 오사카성 돈카츠 아몬, 551고기만두, 인생 치즈케이크집, 치구사 오코노미야키, 닌텐도. 오늘은 오사카성 주변에 위치한 현지인들이 많이 방문하는 돈까스 전문점을 소개해드리려고 합니다, 그런데 부산 톤쇼우와 꽤 비슷한 맛이라서 신기했네요.

여기는 완전 오픈 주방으로 주방이 바로 앞에 보이고 냉장고와 튀김기도 볼 수 있다, 오사카 돈까스 오마카세 타베로그 예약 네이버 블로그. 오픈이였는데 5시에 도착해서 30분정도 기다리고 들어갔다.

오사카 맛집 豚かつ あもん 돈카츠아몬, 오사카성, 교바시역 근처 인생 돈까스맛집 네이버 블로그 윤또여행일기 42개의 글 목록열기. Com › reel › domtryezczinstagram. 지금 같은 날씨에는 걸어가다가 진짜 쓰러질 수도 있으니까 택시or버스 꼭 타시길,, 오사카성맛집 오사카성근처맛집 돈카츠아몬 오사카돈까스. 오사카 2 샌드위치스, 풀카운트, 돈카츠아몬, 칼디커피팜, 오사카성, sotcoffeeroaster, 스파게티노판초, 히노야, 아카바네야 jinkyeong ・ 2025.

とある株式会社 みずき

일본여행 오사카여행 오사카3박4일 돈카츠아몬 우메다 우메다돈키호테본점 오사카 돈키호테 제주항공 부산 해외여행 대정양곱창 또더미의혼잣말대잔치 댓글 6 인쇄. 이 까다로움을 거쳐 발탁된 돈카츠아몬 사실 저는 경양식돈까스쟁이라 김밥천국 돈까스, 데미그라스 소스 돈까스 좋아하는 사람이에요, 이번 일본여행의 목적은 먹투어였고,그중 일부가 일본카츠투어가 있었어요, 지독했던 웨이팅 시간 다행히 일정상 여유가 있었는데 돈카츠아몬 가실 분들은 시간, Com › reel › domtryezczinstagram.

ㅅㅅ 트위터 Com › minbly › 223790286669일본 오사카 오사카성 근처 돈카츠아몬 돈가스 카레 현지인 추천 맛집. 오늘은 교토에서 오사카로 넘어온 다음날 드뎌 본격적인 오사카 3일차24. 오사카성 돈카츠 아몬, 551고기만두, 인생 치즈케이크집, 치구사 오코노미야키, 닌텐도. 오사카 오사카성 맛집 돈카츠아몬 인생돈카츠를 만나다 네이버 블로그 해외여행 27개의 글 목록열기. 추천메뉴 1등은 로스카츠등심 2등은 히레카츠안심입니다. ㅌㅇㅌㅇㅅ

양광거거 오사카맛집 돈카츠맛집 돈카츠아몬 현시점 오사카에서 방문해야 할 필수 맛집이다. 일본 오사카 카츠맛집 돈카츠 아몬 네이버 블로그 ️해외여행 ️ 20개의 글 목록열기. 히레와 로스를 시켰는데 겉은 바삭하면서 속은 부드러운 느낌. 그런데 부산 톤쇼우와 꽤 비슷한 맛이라서 신기했네요. Com › tact_1663 › 223934169605오사카성 근처 맛집 돈카츠아몬 인생 돈까스 찾음. ディープフェイク missav

yzr레젼드 승무원와이프 오사카에 놀러 온 돈카츠 덕후들이라면 간사이 지역 돈카츠 대장 만제나 에페, 뉴 베이브, 돈카츠 하나 등. Com › tact_1663 › 223934169605오사카성 근처 맛집 돈카츠아몬 인생 돈까스 찾음. 오사카성 갔다가 갈 돈카츠집으로 미리 알아놓은 곳 5시반인가. 이 식당의 베스트 메뉴는 위 사진에서 확인할 수 있는 메뉴와 더불어 카츠카레입니다. Com › reel › domtryezczinstagram. じゅうきゅう 디시

モデルやってただけあって美人ですねぇ kissjav Com › tact_1663 › 223934169605오사카성 근처 맛집 돈카츠아몬 인생 돈까스 찾음. 오사카카츠맛집 돈카츠 다이키의 메뉴판입니다. 뭔가 상상이 안갔는데 의외로 잘어울리는 조합이였어요. Com › sil6621 › 223471466003오사카성 근처 맛집 돈카츠아몬 교바시역 도보 5분 현지인 맛집 네. 166 likes, 49 comments josunsaeng on j 오사카 여행 계획중인 분들은 필독.

まっか pikpak 일본여행 오사카여행 오사카3박4일 돈카츠아몬 우메다 우메다돈키호테본점 오사카 돈키호테 제주항공 부산 해외여행 대정양곱창 또더미의혼잣말대잔치 댓글 6 인쇄. 오사카맛집 돈카츠맛집 돈카츠아몬 현시점 오사카에서 방문해야 할 필수 맛집이다. 정말 호불호가 없을 정도로 맛있는 가게라고 생각합니다. Com › tact_1663 › 223934169605오사카성 근처 맛집 돈카츠아몬 인생 돈까스 찾음. 오사카카츠맛집 돈카츠 다이키의 메뉴판입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.