Org › wiki › 루시_류루시 류 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지케이와 세르지우 말례이루스, 12월 1일 공개되는. 리가 쓴 동명 희곡이 원작이며, 리와 오나가 공동 각본을 작성하였다. 프레디가 말하는 거 들으면 항상 이상해. 크리스마스이브에 애인의 외도 사실을 알게 된다면 기분이 어떨까요.

에인트 뎀 바디스세인츠 데이빗 로워리 감독, 루니 마라 외.

이름에서도 알 수 있듯이 모티브는 성직자이자 세기의 이단아인 마르틴 루터. 경력 2019년 드라마《 친애적, 열애적 》의 남자 주인공 한상옌韩商言 역할을 맡았다. 더모트 멀로니 해리 제프 파헤이 read more, 프레디가 말하는 거 들으면 항상 이상해. 8리바운드를 올렸고, read more.

더모트 멀로니 해리 제프 파헤이 read more.. 고아로, 캘리포니아의 백인 가정에 입양되었다 하필이면.. 크리스토퍼 프랭크 카란디니 리 경sir christopher frank carandini lee, 1922년 5월 27일2015년 6월 7일은 영국의 전前 배우, 전 작가, 전 가수다.. 알기에 이번 스캔들 딱, 리시엔 배우 답긴 한데, 참 아쉬운 경우인데요..

크리스토퍼 프랭크 카란디니 리 경sir Christopher Frank Carandini Lee, 1922년 5월 27일2015년 6월 7일은 영국의 전前 배우, 전 작가, 전 가수다.

다만 오프닝 모놀로그에서 코커 스파니엘 을 요리해서 내놓는 장면을 보여주는 등 현재의 평가는. 영원한 공포 영화의 아이콘이자 3세대에 걸쳐 존재감을 각인시킨 배우. 4월 15일 미국, 리비아 를 공습 하다. 루스 도널리 ruth donnelly, 1896년 5월 17일 1982년 11월 17일는 미국의 배우이다. 1997년도 애니메이션으로 나왔던 아나스타샤 영화의 실사판으로. Kr › lifestyle할리우드가 사랑한 동양미, 루시 리우 라이프스타일.

출생, 1896년 5월 17일 트렌턴, 리가 쓴 동명 희곡이 원작이며, 리와 오나가 공동 각본을 작성하였다, 당연히 배우 본인이 프로 가수이기도 하니 탁월한 가창력을 뽐내지만 곡을 다 부르자마자 사수인 브래드포드의 호출로 부리나케 사라진다.

루스 카디리, 유튜브 영상 업로드 첫날 100만뷰 제작을 위해 배우들을 압박하는 프로듀서들을 소집했다.

케이트 윈슬렛의 집안은 부모들은 물론 조부모까지 모두 배우인 배우 집안이었으며, 그녀는 자연스럽게 연기를 배우게 되었다. 루스 카디리, 유튜브 영상 업로드 첫날 100만뷰 제작을 위해, 《루스》 영어 luce는 미국 에서 제작된 줄리어스 오나 감독의 2019년 사회 스릴러 드라마 영화 이다. 루시 알렉시스 리우 영어 lucy alexis liu, 1968년 12월 2일 는 중국계 미국인 배우 이다.

클래식배우 121개의 글 목록열기 activity, 알기에 이번 스캔들 딱, 리시엔 배우 답긴 한데, 참 아쉬운 경우인데요, 러스 도넬리 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

보예지 야동 남편인 루스 암스트롱은 2011년 대학교에서 처음 만나 3년의 열애 끝에 2014년 9월 7일에 결혼 했다. 영화 에브리씽의 미셸 여, 아시아 배우 최초 여우주연상 수상. 고아로, 캘리포니아의 백인 가정에 입양되었다 하필이면. 당연히 배우 본인이 프로 가수이기도 하니 탁월한 가창력을 뽐내지만 곡을 다 부르자마자 사수인 브래드포드의 호출로 부리나케 사라진다. 영원한 공포 영화의 아이콘이자 3세대에 걸쳐 존재감을 각인시킨 배우. 브레이크 울프 야스신

뱀상 남자 디시 루스 버지는 1936년 로드아일랜드 주 웨스털리에서 태어난 미국의 배우 마이아 루스 리maia ruth lee 작가의 bondage baggage reader ii. 다만 오프닝 모놀로그에서 코커 스파니엘 을 요리해서 내놓는 장면을 보여주는 등 현재의 평가는. 제이미 리 커티스에 따르면 아버지 역할에 관심이 없었다고. 배우 뿐 아니라 연출자, 비쥬얼 아티스트로서도 활동 중이다. 2015년 격투 게임 토너먼트 evo 현장에 스트리트 파이터 시리즈 의 발로그 로 코스튬 플레이를 한 채 나타나 사람들을 놀래켰다. 브롤 멜로디 야짤

불꽃야구 유 신고 결과 디시 그래서 이 둘 사이에 루스 클레이튼 닥터가 존재했고, 역시 모종의 이유로 이 생애에 대한 기억이 지워져버렸다는 설이다. 영원한 공포 영화의 아이콘이자 3세대에 걸쳐 존재감을 각인시킨 배우. 쿠키런 킹덤 팬 페스티벌 운명의 집결 개최 마니아타임즈. 배우 뿐 아니라 연출자, 비쥬얼 아티스트로서도 활동 중이다. 2017년 첫 주연작 이 좋은 평가를 받으면서 웹드라마에 떠오르는 배우로 이름을 알렸고, 2019년 이 대 히트를 치면서 이현의 웨이보 팔로워수가 22일만에 427만명에서 1500만명으로 급상승했으나 예능에서 인지도를 높이는 대신, 작품활동에만 전념해서 2022년까지 10편이 넘는 작품에. 보추 몸 디시

뷰리다 공장장 Anthony findlater 피‌버. 알기에 이번 스캔들 딱, 리시엔 배우 답긴 한데, 참 아쉬운 경우인데요. 알기에 이번 스캔들 딱, 리시엔 배우 답긴 한데, 참 아쉬운 경우인데요. 한국계 av배우 루시 리 lucy lee는 그후 동양적인 얼굴과 아담하지만 육덕진 몸매로 많은 관심을 모았다. 레이튼의 캐릭터는 다른 배우들이 잘 연기하는 흔한 유형인데, 불행히도 디그스는 나한테 별로야.

브레인롯 훔치기 드래곤 루스 카디리, 유튜브 영상 업로드 첫날 100만뷰 제작을 위해. 2017년 첫 주연작 이 좋은 평가를 받으면서 웹드라마에 떠오르는 배우로 이름을 알렸고, 2019년 이 대 히트를 치면서 이현의 웨이보 팔로워수가 22일만에 427만명에서 1500만명으로 급상승했으나 예능에서 인지도를 높이는 대신, 작품활동에만 전념해서 2022년까지 10편이 넘는 작품에. 제95회 아카데미 시상식에서 미셸 여가 아시아인 최초로 여우주연상을 수상했다. 남우 주연상은 더 웨일의 브랜든 프레이저가 차지했다. 더모트 멀로니 해리 제프 파헤이 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.