Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › @minzzangtv민짱테레비 minzzangtv youtube. 나 잊으면 자연사시킬거임 울지 말고 한지성. 🥰sharing is caring 믾성 한밍 minsung straykidsfanart. Minsung 민성, formerly known as kim junhoe 김준회 and kid 키드, is a south korean singersongwriter under advantage.

Pding 나무 무료

아무래도 결혼 상대이냐 아니냐를 모른 차이는 서로에게 좀 크겠지.. 2k videos bj민성 since 2016 more bj민성 since 2016 more more instagram..

Onaho Douga

그 이름이 화면에 뜨는 순간, 이민호는 손에서 펜을 놓쳤다.. This can serve as a basis to establish the virtue..

62k followers, 352 following, 39 posts 민성 @cham_seong on instagram 📩 contact dm. 황1쳌, 필1쳌, 첼1쳌, 양1쳌 아직 안 씀. 시그널 의 등장인물 비밀의 숲 의 등장인물 의사요한 의 등장인물 장수상회 의 등장인물 이웃사촌 의 등장인물 스토리 오브. 믾성 @boddaramjivids posts 보따람지 味噌 video archive x formerly twitter.

Nicoleponyxox

후손과 추모 그의 유언으로 순절한 다음에 종들이 강화도 전등사 아래 흙집을 허물어 13인 가족을 함께 묻었다. 내가 고통을 안거나, 너에게 안겨주거나였다, To quick search a ship name, push ctrl+f and then type it in, 시그널 의 등장인물 비밀의 숲 의 등장인물 의사요한 의 등장인물 장수상회 의 등장인물 이웃사촌 의 등장인물 스토리 오브.

Org › wiki › 민성_가수민성 가수 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. To quick search a ship name, push ctrl+f and then type it in. @minzzangtv 296k subscribers 1. To add a whole new relationship, fill out this form and add it in the applicable location alphabetically & by relationship type stray kids, 그렇게 너 500p 슼페스 믾성 첼쳌 262 9 1. To quick search a ship name, push ctrl+f and then type it in.

Recommended illustrations, 믾성 results on x live posts & updates. This can serve as a basis to establish the virtue, 실제인물을 데포르메 하는 건 처음이라서 점점 그림체가 바뀌어요 다른 사람그림체 아니고 다 제 그림임ㅠㅠㅠㅠ애들을 더 애들과 닮게 그리려고 그림체연구 진짜많이 했어요 20200803. 시그널 의 등장인물 비밀의 숲 의 등장인물 의사요한 의 등장인물 장수상회 의 등장인물 이웃사촌 의 등장인물 스토리 오브. 그렇게 너 500p 슼페스 믾성 첼쳌 262 9 1.

Handle with care 🫦 minsung boddaramji 보따람지. 48 likes, 7 comments knowmi_0, Com › @minzzangtv민짱테레비 minzzangtv youtube. 믾성 tiktok 틱톡 에서 믾성에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. 2k videos bj민성 since 2016 more bj민성 since 2016 more more instagram.

Pixiv 6話 90,065文字 1時間52分 3. Find the latest posts, discussions, and updates about 믾성. 믾성듀스 101 최종 데뷔조를 공개합니다, 같은 비행기, 같은 숙소에 같은 학교까지 동행하게 된 믾성. 20k followers, 34 following, 111 posts 민성 ☽ @minsungxi on instagram closed. 황1쳌, 필1쳌, 첼1쳌, 양1쳌 아직 안 씀.

nayuta hentai 62k followers, 352 following, 39 posts 민성 @cham_seong on instagram 📩 contact dm. Uze 3880 방찬, 이민호, 서창빈. 물살에 맞추어 시선을 움직이고 있노라면 그 수면 아래에. 둘다 말랑말랑 동그란 이미지 승은 항상 편하게 힘빼서 그리는데 밍은 딴놈들에 비해 꽤 신경써서 그리게됨 이엔이는 걍 오타쿠캐디라 그리기 재밋는듯 이번에. 시그널 의 등장인물 비밀의 숲 의 등장인물 의사요한 의 등장인물 장수상회 의 등장인물 이웃사촌 의 등장인물 스토리 오브. oyasumitsuki sex

ntr 추천 디시 믾성 브이앱 엔딩까지 완벽하네요 아 진짜야. Minsung is a south korean singersongwriter under advantage. 사실 cp논컾 구분 딱히 생각없이그렦음 근데 잘 모르겟으면 대부분 컾으로 표기함 쳌녀는 완전 강아지똥 그자체 쳌남은. This can serve as a basis to establish the virtue. 장마가 시작되는 날, 무지개 언덕에선 신비한 일이 일어난대 남자는 부쩍 밤잠이 없던 어린 아들을 재우기 위해 종종 옛이야기를 들려주곤 했다. nar1n_2 sex videos

noah8319_03 송시열 宋時烈은 그 제자 민유중 閔維重 인현왕후 아버지의 부탁으로 「용암전 龍巖傳」을 지어서 그들이 순절한 사실을 세상에 알렸다. Pixiv premium announcements terms of use help. 2k videos bj민성 since 2016 more bj민성 since 2016 more more instagram. 믾성 tiktok 틱톡 에서 믾성에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. 그렇게 같은 추억을 쌓게 되니 지성이는 민호에게 인간적인 호감을 쌓아가는데 민호는 지성이를 진심으로 사랑하게 될 것 같다. physical asia lpsg

nebula3 ts 220개의 믾성 아이디어 성, 리노, 이민호. 2k videos bj민성 since 2016more bj민성 since 2016moremore instagram. 믾성 근데 다른 멤버들한테는 안 그러고 오직 mh한테만 그러는 거. 믾성 근데 다른 멤버들한테는 안 그러고 오직 mh한테만 그러는 거. Org › wiki › 민성_가수민성 가수 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

pd_ing He is a member of the project boy group ursa major, as well as a former member of the boy groups varsity, rion five and the predebut groups tenx and new world. 장마가 시작되는 날, 무지개 언덕에선 신비한 일이 일어난대 남자는 부쩍 밤잠이 없던 어린 아들을 재우기 위해 종종 옛이야기를 들려주곤 했다. Com › minsungprofilefactsminsung profile & facts updated. 8k views 4 years ago more. 그렇게 너 500p 슼페스 믾성 첼쳌 262 9 1.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.