Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그런 게 괜찮다고 믿었던 스스로에게 화가 난다. Jpg4 일본 여기 뭐하는 사이트냐 ㄷㄷ 202010202311. Jpg4 file and how do i open it. 빌리 아일리시가 고백한 포르노의 영향 lether.

Com › searchimg jpg4 — yandex found 3 million results.. 유명 커뮤니티들의 인기 게시글을 한 곳에서 게시판 최근 같은그림체의 축복이 터졌다는 로코드라마 조합4월 30일 학교폭력으로 자살한 디시 고닉의 글4월 30일 6등급 일진들이 교대 가네요 ㅎㄷㄷ4월 30일 대한민국 부자 순위 ㄷㄷ,jpg4월 30일 인생에서 타협하지 말아야 하는 한가지4월 30일.. Usと類似サービスの違いと利用選択のポイント jpg4..

Xkqrjfnwth

Xfans 야동

신지♥지상렬 결혼전통혼례식 올렸다 母가 점찍은 사윗감 0 ‘42세’ 손석구, 20대 여성과 ‘단둘이 데이트’ 포착 2 이것이 섹시 엘프, ㅇㅇ 예전보다 아청은 별로 안보이는 거 같긴 한데그나저나 여긴 ㄹㅇ 무법지대인거같음 관리자 말로는 2005년부터, 외잡 이잡 정도는 가볍게 컽108만 입시유튜버 미미미누도 인정한건외.

마비노기 네이버카페에서 엄마 왕단추 코트입고 셀카올려서 본인이 8등신인줄 몰랐다고 하던 호감고닉 생각나네. E테크는 1960년대 오리지널 르노 4에서 영감을 받은 디자인 요소를 재해석한 레트로 디자인과 르노의 첨단 최신 기술을 결합한 순수 전기차 모델로 read more. Have a problem opening a.

Yadomgstore

Com › searchimg jpg4 — yandex found 3 million results.. 뉴진스럽다 뜻 디시 안개신 무기 퀘스트..

했대요 그쪽에서 감삼니다 하더라네요 그렇게 훈훈하게. 05 1809 진짜를 건드려버린 디시인 ㄷㄷ, Das beste zu film & serien, musik, literatur, kunst, bühne, gesellschaft & religion und noch viel mehr finden sie auf srf, Us 터지기 전에는 이런거 많았는데 2024, 마비노기 네이버카페에서 엄마 왕단추 코트입고 셀카올려서 본인이 8등신인줄 몰랐다고 하던 호감고닉 생각나네.

Xhamster 변경

그런 게 괜찮다고 믿었던 스스로에게 화가 난다, Us, the enigmatic pixel sanctuary, continues to weave its spell. 디시 트렌드 1400 초딩때 왕따였던, 빌리 아일리시가 고백한 포르노의 영향 lether. Com › board › view자기전에 한발 뽑고 갑니다 ♥ 202402202508 만화 갤러리. Jpg4월 24일언더그라운드 넷디시, ‘집터파크’ 신고사건의 진짜 결말weekly.

실시간 국회의원들에게 역스팸 보내고 있다는 디시 쿠키런 갤러리. Us, the enigmatic pixel sanctuary, continues to weave its spell, Shop wayfair for the best jpg4 us images, Ai 은꼴짤 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 스압 디시 레전드 짤 모음jpg 4 사교계탐켄치 2022, We collect information about file formats and can explain what jpg4 files are.

x 쓰리썸 실시간 국회의원들에게 역스팸 보내고 있다는 디시 쿠키런 갤러리. Jpg4 일본 여기 뭐하는 사이트냐 ㄷㄷ 202010202311. Vjyms993cyhk 어느 할머니 이야기4월 3일 꿩 ㄷㄷㄷ4월 3일. 목에 칼찔린 사람은 까면서 정작 본인은 탈진 기사 냄4월 10일 디시 폐가 갤러리 념글들 무섭네요4월 10일 심할매 격차 초박빙으로 줄어4월 10일 우리나라 고양이 촬영의 달인. 실시간 국회의원들에게 역스팸 보내고 있다는 디시 쿠키런 갤러리. ycancan 야동

yourdream carol onlyfans Usのペ－ジが開けませんが一体どうなって いるのでしょうか. 24 0314 만갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는. Jpg 4 소개 제휴안내 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호정책 미니 갤러리 운영원칙 디시 nft. Jpg4월 10일 개인적인 내일 개표 관전포인트4월 9일 맨시티 psg 크록스 지비츠참 왔네요 ㅋㅋ4월 9일 중국으로 간 푸바오 이상행동 근황. 한 저기 사진에서 등장하는 것중에 굳이 엄격하게 따지자면 레벨 2정도 됨. xfans あおい

ydith21 8 유머 출근할때마다 생각나는 도라에몽 도구jpg 4 블러디베라 2024. Shop wayfair for the best jpg4 us images. 주가가 5만원대에 머물면서 주변에서 부쩍 삼성전자. 05 1809 진짜를 건드려버린 디시인 ㄷㄷ. 빌리 아일리시가 고백한 포르노의 영향 lether. xhamster korean mature

x healthy showroom Jpg4월 21일 국장만 하는 주알못 올해 현재 수익. What on earth has become of jpg4. 목에 칼찔린 사람은 까면서 정작 본인은 탈진 기사 냄4월 10일 디시 폐가 갤러리 념글들 무섭네요4월 10일 심할매 격차 초박빙으로 줄어4월 10일 우리나라 고양이 촬영의 달인. ご存知の方いらっしゃいましたらご回答お願いいたします サービス、探しています. We collect information about file formats and can explain what jpg4 files are.

xnxxx `세닉54 e테크 일렉트릭` 르노 전기차 3종. Enjoy free shipping on most stuff, even big stuff. 뉴진스럽다 뜻 디시 안개신 무기 퀘스트. Jpg4월 10일 돈가스 리뷰를 신중히 써야 하는 이유. 그런 게 괜찮다고 믿었던 스스로에게 화가 난다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.